ARTÍCULO DE INVESTIGACIÓN
Scopus 1900–2020: Growth in articles, abstracts,
countries, campos, and journals
Mike Thelwall
and Pardeep Sud
University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, Reino Unido
un acceso abierto
diario
Palabras clave: academic publishing, academic publishing trends, scholarly databases, Scopus
Citación: Thelwall, METRO., & Sud, PAG. (2022).
Scopus 1900–2020: Growth in articles,
abstracts, countries, campos, y
journals. Estudios de ciencias cuantitativas,
3(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss
_a_00177
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00177
Revisión por pares:
https://publons.com/publon/10.1162
/qss_a_00177
Recibió: 19 Octubre 2021
Aceptado: 14 December 2021
Autor correspondiente:
Mike Thelwall
m.thelwall@wlv.ac.uk
Editor de manejo:
Juego Waltman
Derechos de autor: © 2022 Mike Thelwall and
Pardeep Sud. Published under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
Internacional (CC POR 4.0) licencia.
La prensa del MIT
ABSTRACTO
Scientometric research often relies on large-scale bibliometric databases of academic journal
artículos. Long-term and longitudinal research can be affected if the composition of a database
varies over time, and text processing research can be affected if the percentage of articles with
abstracts changes. This article therefore assesses changes in the magnitude of the coverage of a
major citation index, Scopus, encima 121 years from 1900. The results show sustained
exponential growth from 1900, except for dips during both world wars, and with increased
growth after 2004. Over the same period, the percentage of articles with 500+ personaje
abstracts increased from 1% a 95%. The number of different journals in Scopus also increased
exponentially, but slowing down from 2010, with the number of articles per journal being
approximately constant until 1980, then tripling due to megajournals and online-only
publicación. The breadth of Scopus, in terms of the number of narrow fields with substantial
numbers of articles, simultaneously increased from one field having 1,000 articles in 1945 a
308 fields in 2020. Scopus’s international character also radically changed from 68% of first
authors from Germany and the United States in 1900 to just 17% en 2020, con china
dominating (25%).
yo
D
oh
w
norte
oh
a
d
mi
d
F
r
oh
metro
h
t
t
pag
:
/
/
d
i
r
mi
C
t
.
metro
i
t
.
/
mi
d
tu
q
s
s
/
a
r
t
i
C
mi
–
pag
d
yo
F
/
/
/
/
/
3
1
3
7
2
0
0
8
3
6
0
q
s
s
_
a
_
0
0
1
7
7
pag
d
.
F
b
y
gramo
tu
mi
s
t
t
oh
norte
0
7
S
mi
pag
mi
metro
b
mi
r
2
0
2
3
INTRODUCCIÓN
1.
Science is not static, with the number of active journals increasing at a rate of 3.3%–4.7% per
year between 1900 y 1996 (Gu & Blackmore, 2016; Mabe & Amin, 2001). Bibliometric
studies covering a substantial period need to choose a start year and be aware of changes
and any anomalies during the time covered. Citations over a long period are needed in
bibliometric studies of the evolution of journal (Jayaratne & Zwahlen, 2015), campo (Pilkington
& Meredith, 2009), author (Maflahi & Thelwall, 2021), or national (Fu & A, 2013; luna-
Morales, Collazo-Reyes et al., 2009) research impact over time. Unless constrained by a
research question, the logical start year for bibliometric studies covering many years might
be either the most recent date when there was a change in the character of the bibliometric
database used, or the earliest year when sufficient articles were indexed according to some
criteria. It is therefore useful to assess the temporal characteristics of bibliometric databases
to aid decisions by researchers about when to start, particularly as some facets, incluido
narrow fields, average citations and the presence of abstracts, are not currently straightforward
to obtain from the web interfaces of citation indexes. This article focuses on one of the major
citation indexes, Scopus.
Scopus 1900–2020
Little is known about the historical coverage of the major citation indexes, other than the
information reported by their owners. This typically gives overall totals rather than yearly
breakdowns (p.ej., Clarivate, 2021; Dimensions, 2021; Elsevier, 2021). Scopus currently has
wider coverage of the academic literature than the Web of Science (WoS) and CrossRef open
DOI-to-DOI citations, similar coverage to Dimensions, but much lower coverage than Google
Scholar and Microsoft Academic (Martín-Martín, Thelwall et al., 2021; singh, Singh et al.,
2021; Thelwall, 2018). Lower coverage than Google Scholar and Microsoft Academic is a
logical outcome of the standards that journals must meet to be indexed by Scopus (p.ej., Baas,
Schotten et al., 2020; Gasparyan & Kitas, 2021; Pranckutė, 2021; Schotten, Meester et al.,
2017) and WoS (Birkle, Pendlebury et al., 2020). Sin embargo, non-English journals seem
to be underrepresented in both Scopus and WoS (Mongeon & Casa de Pablo, 2016). One source
of difference between WoS and Scopus is that WoS aims to generate a balanced set of jour-
nals to support the quality of citation data used for impact evaluations (Birkle et al., 2020).
While a larger set of journals would be better for information retrieval, a more balanced set
would help citation data that is field normalized or norm-referenced within its field (p.ej.,
adding many rarely cited journals to a single field would push existing journals into higher
journal impact factor quartiles and increase the field normalized citation score of cited arti-
cles in the existing journals). Even if two databases cover the same journals they can index
different numbers of articles from them, due to errors or different rules for categorizing a
document as an article (Liu, Huang, & Wang, 2021). En general, while Dimensions provides
the most free support for researchers (Herzog, Hook, & Konkiel, 2020), Scopus seems to be
the largest quality-controlled citation index and also covers substantially more years than
Dimensions or the WoS Core Collection: It is therefore a logical choice for long-term investi-
gaciones. No study seems to have analyzed the historical coverage of any citation index, cómo-
alguna vez, with the partial exception of the WoS Century of Science specialist offering (Wallace,
Larivière, & Gingras, 2009).
Some date-specific information is known about Scopus. It was developed by Elsevier from 2002,
released in 2004 (Schotten et al., 2017), and has since incorporated many articles from before its
start date. In the absence of systematic evidence of Scopus coverage changes over time, Scopus-
based studies needing long-term data have often chosen 1996 as a starting point in the originally
correct belief (li, Burnham et al., 2010) that there was a change in Scopus in this year (p.ej., Budimir,
Rahimeh et al., 2021; Subbotin & Aref, 2021; many Thelwall papers). En 2015, Scopus recognized
1996 as a watershed year for coverage and added 4 million earlier articles and associated refer-
ences into the system (Beatty, 2015). Because of this update, 1996 may no longer be a critical year.
The current article explores whether 1996 or any other year represents a shift in Scopus coverage
and reports a selection of more fine-grained information to help researchers using Scopus for
historical data, by allowing them to pick a starting year with sufficient data for their study.
The indexing of abstracts is also important. Abstracts in academic articles typically summa-
rise the parts of an article, usually reusing sentences from the main body (Atanassova, Bertin, &
Larivière, 2016). Some journals require a structured format, ensuring that background,
methods, resultados, and implications are all covered in a simple format (Nakayama, Hirai
et al., 2005). They are needed for studies that attempt to predict future citation counts
(Stegehuis, Litvak, & waltman, 2015), or to map the development of fields or their evolution
based on the terms in article titles, abstracts, and keywords (p.ej., Anwar, bibi, & Ahmad, 2021;
Blatt, 2009; Kallens & Valle, 2018; Porturas & taylor, 2021). The proportion of articles with
abstracts is also relevant for the scope of keyword-based literature searches that cover many
décadas (p.ej., Sweileh, Al-Jabi et al., 2019), since the searches will be less effective for articles
without abstracts, if these are more common in some years. Abstracts have been mainly
Estudios de ciencias cuantitativas
38
yo
D
oh
w
norte
oh
a
d
mi
d
F
r
oh
metro
h
t
t
pag
:
/
/
d
i
r
mi
C
t
.
metro
i
t
.
/
mi
d
tu
q
s
s
/
a
r
t
i
C
mi
–
pag
d
yo
F
/
/
/
/
/
3
1
3
7
2
0
0
8
3
6
0
q
s
s
_
a
_
0
0
1
7
7
pag
d
.
F
b
y
gramo
tu
mi
s
t
t
oh
norte
0
7
S
mi
pag
mi
metro
b
mi
r
2
0
2
3
Scopus 1900–2020
studied for their informational role (p.ej., Jimenez, Avila et al., 2020; Jin, Duan et al., 2021) o
writing style (Abdollahpour & Gholami, 2018; kim & Sotavento, 2020).
Abstracts are known to have changed in format over time and individual journal policies
have evolved. Por ejemplo, although Scopus has indexed Landscape History since 1979, el
first abstract from this journal was in 1989 for the article, “Cairns and ‘cairn fields’; evidence of
early agriculture on Cefn Bryn, Gower, West Glamorgan,” although this seemed to be an
author innovation, starting their article with a short section entitled “Summary” rather than
a journal-required or optional abstract. From browsing the journal, 1997 seems to be the year
when abstracts were first mandatory, representing a policy change. In some fields, abstracts
were published separately to articles in dedicated abstracting periodicals (p.ej., Biológico
Abstracts) so that potential readers would have a single paper source to help them quickly scan
the contents of multiple journals (Manzer, 1977). Por ejemplo, early mathematics papers
tended not to have abstracts, but very short summaries were instead posted by independent
reviewers in publications such as Zentralblatt MATH (Teschke, Wegner, & Werner, 2011) y
Mathematical Reviews (Precio, 2017). Some journals also had sections dedicated to summariz-
ing abstracts of other journals’ contents (p.ej., Hollander, 1954). Despite the value and different
uses of abstracts, no study seems to have assessed the historical prevalence or length of
abstracts associated with articles in any major database.
The coverage of bibliometric databases is a separate issue to their citations, although the
two are connected. Nothing is known about trends in average citation counts for Scopus, pero un
study of references in the WoS Century of Science 1900–2006 found an increasing number of
citations per document, from less than 1 en 1900 to an arithmetic mean of 8 (Social Sciences),
10 (Natural Sciences and Engineering), y 22 (Medicamento) en 2006, based on a 10-year citation
window (Wallace et al., 2009). Changes over time in the types of journals cited by articles
in the WoS also been investigated, showing reduced concentration (Larivière, Gingras, &
Archambault, 2009).
Driven by the above issues, the goal of the current paper is to present a descriptive analysis
of Scopus 1900–2020 in terms of the annual numbers of articles published as well as its field
coverage, citation counts, and abstracts.
2. MÉTODOS
2.1. Datos
Documents in Scopus are assigned a type, such as book, trade journal article, or academic
journal article. De estos, academic journal articles are the most relevant to research evaluation
and bibliometrics and so other types were ignored. Documents are also usually assigned nar-
row and broad fields in Scopus, con 337 narrow fields being declared (Elsevier, 2021),
although some are not used (p.ej., 3699 Sports Science, 3323 Social Work, 2509 Nanotech-
nología). The records for all journal articles in Scopus were downloaded through its Applica-
tions Programming Interface (API) with narrow field queries because this is the easiest way to
identify which narrow field articles belong to via the API. Queries were submitted in the
following form, dónde 1213 is the narrow field code for Visual Arts and Performing Arts.
SUBJMAIN(1213) AND DOCTYPE(ar) AND SRCTYPE( j)
The query was also submitted with every other narrow field code and every year between
1900 y 2020 (sent as the API year query parameter). The queries were submitted at
Estudios de ciencias cuantitativas
39
yo
D
oh
w
norte
oh
a
d
mi
d
F
r
oh
metro
h
t
t
pag
:
/
/
d
i
r
mi
C
t
.
metro
i
t
.
/
mi
d
tu
q
s
s
/
a
r
t
i
C
mi
–
pag
d
yo
F
/
/
/
/
/
3
1
3
7
2
0
0
8
3
6
0
q
s
s
_
a
_
0
0
1
7
7
pag
d
.
F
b
y
gramo
tu
mi
s
t
t
oh
norte
0
7
S
mi
pag
mi
metro
b
mi
r
2
0
2
3
Scopus 1900–2020
substantially different time periods as part of an ongoing updating exercise to keep within
Scopus usage restrictions and to avoid overloading the Scopus servers. The three batches used
for this article were downloaded as follows.
(cid:129) Article records for 1900–1995 were downloaded in September 2021.
(cid:129) Article records for 1996–2013 were downloaded in November–December 2018.
(cid:129) Article records for 2014–2020 were downloaded in January 2021.
The differences between download years should only influence the citation data, unless
Scopus has substantially changed its 1996–2013 coverage after 2018, which seems unlikely.
There may be minor changes due to new de-duplication algorithms or other improvements,
sin embargo.
The data was checked for consistency by generating time series for the number of articles
per year, per narrow field. Some gaps were identified due to software errors, and these were
filled by redownloading the missing data for the narrow field and year within 2 months of the
original download date.
2.2. Análisis
Purely descriptive data is presented, matching the purpose of this article. Since some biblio-
metric studies use article abstracts, statistics are reported for articles containing abstracts as
well as for all articles.
It is not straightforward to identify whether an article has an abstract, so a rule was generated to
estimate this. Some articles in Scopus have abstracts indexed as part of their record, although they
may not always be called “abstract” in the published article (p.ej., “Summary”). These abstracts
typically include copyright statements and sometimes only a copyright statement is present in
the abstract field. As in previous papers from the authors’ research group (p.ej., Fairclough &
Thelwall, 2021), a heuristically chosen 500 character minimum (acerca de 80 palabras) was set as indic-
ative of a reasonably substantial abstract that is unlikely to be purely a copyright statement.
As an indicator of field breadth, data is reported for the number of narrow fields containing
a given number of articles. Since a field may be large due to a single journal, data is also
reported for the number of fields containing a given number of journals, as a rough indicator
of diversity of content (although individual megajournals can also have diverse content: Siler,
Larivière, & Sugimoto, 2020).
Average citations per year are reported with both the traditional arithmetic mean and the
more precise geometric mean for typical highly skewed citation count data (Fairclough &
Thelwall, 2015; Thelwall, 2016). The citation count data is not symmetrical (p.ej., equally dis-
tributed on either side of the mean) but is highly skewed: While most articles have zero or few
citas, so that their citation counts are slightly less than the mean, the citation counts of a
small number of highly cited articles are far greater than the mean (Precio, 1976; Seglen, 1992).
Por ejemplo, the skewness is enormous at 107 para el 2004 citation counts and even larger for
recent years (387 en 2020), whereas the skewness of the normal distribution is 0.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The main results are introduced and discussed below. Additional graphs and brief discussion
are in the online supplement and the full data behind all graphs is also online, both on
FigShare at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.16834198.
Estudios de ciencias cuantitativas
40
yo
D
oh
w
norte
oh
a
d
mi
d
F
r
oh
metro
h
t
t
pag
:
/
/
d
i
r
mi
C
t
.
metro
i
t
.
/
mi
d
tu
q
s
s
/
a
r
t
i
C
mi
–
pag
d
yo
F
/
/
/
/
/
3
1
3
7
2
0
0
8
3
6
0
q
s
s
_
a
_
0
0
1
7
7
pag
d
.
F
b
y
gramo
tu
mi
s
t
t
oh
norte
0
7
S
mi
pag
mi
metro
b
mi
r
2
0
2
3
Scopus 1900–2020
Cifra 1. Number of documents of type journal article indexed in Scopus, as retrieved by its API.
There are separate lines for all articles, all articles in each field (es decir., counting an article n times if it is
in n narrow fields) and the number of articles with 500+ word abstracts.
3.1. Total Number of Articles
The number of articles in Scopus shows exponential growth from 1900 al menos 2020
(Cifra 1). The extent to which the trend reflects the technical limitations of Scopus and its
indexing policy rather than the amount of scholarly publishing is unclear because not all jour-
nals qualify for indexing (p.ej., Mabe & Amin, 2001). The kink in the logarithmic line in the
year that Scopus launched, 2004, suggests that its expansion accelerated more quickly after
entonces. More specifically, the initial release in 2004 and subsequent backfilling projects were
surpassed by subsequent expansions of additional journals. The graph from 1970 can be com-
pared to the equivalent WoS volume of coverage in response to the DT=(Article) query. WoS
does not have a kink in 2004, suggesting that this is a Scopus phenomenon ( WoS has a similar
exponentially increasing shape, with sudden increases in 1996, 2015, y 2019: See the
online supplement for a graph).
Both world wars resulted in decreases in coverage, presumably due to many scientists and
journal staff switching to unpublished military research or service (p.ej., Hyland, 2017). Estafa-
ditions were described as “extremely difficult” for journal publishing in the second world war
(Anonymous, 1944) and there would also have been problems with international transport for
printed journals. Por ejemplo, the number of Nature articles per year indexed in Scopus
decreased temporarily during both world wars. Al mismo tiempo, war created the need for
new types of research, leading to the emergence of new fields, such as occupational medicine
(Herrero, 2009) and operational research (Molinero, 1992), but this did not immediately trans-
late into expanded academic publishing overall.
3.2. The Proportion of Articles with Abstracts
The proportion of articles with a substantial abstract of at least 500 characters has increased
de 1% en 1900 a 95% en 2020 (Cifra 2). A 500-character abstract contains about 80 palabras,
Estudios de ciencias cuantitativas
41
yo
D
oh
w
norte
oh
a
d
mi
d
F
r
oh
metro
h
t
t
pag
:
/
/
d
i
r
mi
C
t
.
metro
i
t
.
/
mi
d
tu
q
s
s
/
a
r
t
i
C
mi
–
pag
d
yo
F
/
/
/
/
/
3
1
3
7
2
0
0
8
3
6
0
q
s
s
_
a
_
0
0
1
7
7
pag
d
.
F
b
y
gramo
tu
mi
s
t
t
oh
norte
0
7
S
mi
pag
mi
metro
b
mi
r
2
0
2
3
Scopus 1900–2020
Cifra 2. The percentage of Scopus journal articles with abstract length at least 500, 1,000, o
2,000 characters.
so is short but nontrivial even if the copyright statement is included, as the example below
ilustra.
“© 2019 Brill Academic Publishers. All rights reserved. This paper presents the new and
actually the first diplomatic publication of the unique 16th-century copy of the Church Sla-
vonic Song of Songs translated from a Jewish original, most likely not the proper Masoretic
Text but apparently its Old Yiddish translation. This Slavonic translation is extremely impor-
tant for Judaic-Slavic relations in the context of literature and language contacts between
Jews and Slavs in medieval Slavia Orthodoxa.” (Grishchenko, 2019).
yo
D
oh
w
norte
oh
a
d
mi
d
F
r
oh
metro
h
t
t
pag
:
/
/
d
i
r
mi
C
t
.
metro
i
t
.
/
mi
d
tu
q
s
s
/
a
r
t
i
C
mi
–
pag
d
yo
F
/
/
/
/
/
3
1
3
7
2
0
0
8
3
6
0
q
s
s
_
a
_
0
0
1
7
7
pag
d
.
F
b
y
gramo
tu
mi
s
t
t
oh
norte
0
7
S
mi
pag
mi
metro
b
mi
r
2
0
2
3
A 1,000-character abstract has about 160 words and these longer abstracts have become
increasingly common. A diferencia de, long abstracts with at least 2,000 characters and about 320
words are still rare, accounting for only 10% of articles in 2020.
The increasing percentage of articles with nontrivial abstracts presumably reflects their
increasing necessity in scientific research due to their role in attracting readers (and hence cita-
tions for the publishing journal). The trend found here may also partly reflect Scopus ingesting
early sources that omitted abstracts, although no evidence was found for this as a cause. en contra-
contraste, some of the few early abstracts indexed by Scopus were not part of the original article. Para
ejemplo, some early psychology articles (p.ej., Pressey, 1917) had abstracts attached to them in
Scopus that apparently originated from APA Psycnet (p.ej., https://doi.org/10.1037/h0070284)
and may have been extracted by PsycInfo from early psychology abstracting journals (p.ej., Psy-
chological Abstracts). De este modo, the early results may partly reflect retrospective attempts to add
abstracts. One early journal with genuine abstracts was the Journal of the American Chemical
Sociedad, which allowed articles to have a separate section at the end entitled Summary. Mientras
this could be interpreted as part of the article, it has a different heading format and could rea-
sonably be classed as an abstract. At least one author conceived the summary as being separate
from the article, stating, “The foregoing article may be summarized as follows:" (clark, 1918).
En 2020 the median abstract length was 1,367 characters or 200 palabras. This median is
presumably partly due to some journals having a 200-word abstract length limit in their
Estudios de ciencias cuantitativas
42
Scopus 1900–2020
Cifra 3. Number of Scopus narrow fields with specified minimum numbers of articles.
guidelines for authors (p.ej., Estudios de ciencias cuantitativas, Nature Scientific Reports, most Royal
Society journals, many Wiley journals).
3.3. Narrow Field Coverage
Scopus has over 100 narrow fields with some articles for 1900, with the number of narrow
fields increasing over time (Cifra 3). The increasing shapes of the lines reflect Scopus narrow
fields having uneven sizes, with most growing in size as the database grows overall. El
number of narrow fields in Scopus is relevant for studies that attempt to present a broad picture
of science. It is not clear whether the increasing number of substantial narrow fields reflects the
greater coverage of Scopus or increased specialization in science, sin embargo. De este modo, the analysis
of long-term cross-science trends is a particularly difficult issue.
Almost all Scopus narrow fields include few journals (<10) until after the Second World War, when the number of narrow fields with at least 10 different journals increases from 25 (Figure 4). By 2020, most narrow fields included at least 100 different journals. 3.4. Number of Journals and Average Journal Size Scopus indexed few journals in 1900, with growth starting after the Second World War or the end of the 1960s, if only articles with 500+ character abstracts are included (Figure 5). Surprisingly, the growth in the number of journals slowed and then stopped by 2020, perhaps due to the increasing number of general or somewhat general megajournals (Siler et al., 2020) adequately filling spaces that new niche journals might previously have occupied. The journal count for 2020 may also increase as back issues of new journals are added in 2021 and afterwards. The number of articles per journal fluctuated considerably between 1900 and 1980, with apparently thinner journals during both world wars (Figure 6). From 1980, journals seemed to grow in average size, perhaps aided by online-only journals without print journal limits on the annual numbers of articles. The apparent accelerated growth after 2010 is presumably due to Quantitative Science Studies 43 l D o w n o a d e d f r o m h t t p : / / d i r e c t . m i t . / e d u q s s / a r t i c e - p d l f / / / / / 3 1 3 7 2 0 0 8 3 6 0 q s s _ a _ 0 0 1 7 7 p d . f b y g u e s t t o n 0 7 S e p e m b e r 2 0 2 3 Scopus 1900–2020 Figure 4. Number of Scopus narrow fields with specified minimum numbers of different journals. increases in the number and size of online-only megajournals, starting in 2006 with PLOS ONE (Domnina, 2016), which had 230,518 articles in Scopus by 2020. The 10 largest journals in Scopus in 2020 were all arguably megajournals (Scientific Reports, IEEE Access, PLOS ONE, Sustainability, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Applied Sciences, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Science of the Total Environment, Sensors, Energies), with only Science of the Total Environment existing before PLOS ONE. Megajournals have expanded to cover multiple more specialist roles, impinging on multiple fields (Siler et al., 2020). These combined factors seem likely to be the cause of tripling the average number of articles per journal between 1980 and 2020. l D o w n o a d e d f r o m h t t p : / / d i r e c t . m i t . / e d u q s s / a r t i c e - p d l f / / / / / 3 1 3 7 2 0 0 8 3 6 0 q s s _ a _ 0 0 1 7 7 p d . f b y g u e s t t o n 0 7 S e p e m b e r 2 0 2 3 Figure 5. Number of different journals in Scopus by year. Quantitative Science Studies 44 Scopus 1900–2020 Figure 6. The average (mean) number of articles per journal in Scopus. 3.5. International Coverage (Authorship) The national character of Scopus has changed dramatically over the 121 years covered (Figure 7). Initially, over two-thirds of first authors with known country affiliations were from the United States and Germany (Figure 8), but by 2020 China had substantially more articles than these two combined, and India had the third most articles (Figure 8). The number of articles with country affiliations dropped substantially during the Second World War, although the cause is unknown (e.g., Scopus indexing discrepancies, journal policy changes, or l D o w n o a d e d f r o m h t t p : / / d i r e c t . m i t . / e d u q s s / a r t i c e - p d l f / / / / / 3 1 3 7 2 0 0 8 3 6 0 q s s _ a _ 0 0 1 7 7 p d . f b y g u e s t t o n 0 7 S e p e m b e r 2 0 2 3 Figure 7. The percentage of Scopus articles with first author from the 12 countries with the most articles. Articles in multiple narrow fields are counted once for each narrow field. Quantitative Science Studies 45 Scopus 1900–2020 l D o w n o a d e d f r o m h t t p : / / d i r e c t . m i t . / e d u q s s / a r t i c e - p d l f / / / / / 3 1 3 7 2 0 0 8 3 6 0 q s s _ a _ 0 0 1 7 7 p d . f b y g u e s t t o n 0 7 S e p e m b e r 2 0 2 3 Figure 8. The percentage of Scopus articles with first author from the 12 countries with the most articles, excluding articles where the first author country is unknown (i.e., changing only the denominator from the previous graph). Articles in multiple narrow fields are counted once for each narrow field. scientists omitting affiliations). Germany’s contribution to the international literature dropped dramatically during both world wars, presumably by cutting it off from the publishing houses of the United Kingdom and United States. Germany’s decline in the 1930s may have been partly due to the anti-Semitic policies of the Nazi party disrupting scholarship and causing a mass exodus of skilled researchers (e.g., in maths: Siegmund-Schultze, 1994). 3.6. Average Citation Counts Articles accrue citations over time, so older articles have longer to be cited and should have more citations than newer articles, other factors being equal. This pattern is only partly evident in Scopus, however, since there is a peak in the year 2000 (Figure 9). This peak remains if the geometric mean is used (Fairclough & Thelwall, 2015), so it is not due to a few highly cited articles. The relatively few citations for articles published before 2000 could be due to a combination of factors, but the most likely seem to be (cid:129) shorter reference lists in older papers; (cid:129) a tendency to cite newer research in the digital age due to electronic searching, online first, and preprint archives; (cid:129) fewer references in older papers mentioning journal articles; and (cid:129) greater technical difficulty in matching citations to articles in older journals. A similar lack of citations for older articles has been found for the WoS (Wallace et al., 2009). The size of the index does not seem to be an important consideration because, while there are Quantitative Science Studies 46 Scopus 1900–2020 Figure 9. Average (arithmetic and geometric mean) citation counts for Scopus journal articles, by year. Citation data for 1900–1995 is from September 2021, for 1996–2013 is from December 2018, and for 2013–2020 is from January 2021. fewer contemporary articles to cite old articles, there are also fewer articles to be cited, so the two factors largely cancel out under a scenario of constant growth. It is also possible that Scopus indexed a smaller fraction of the early scientific literature, therefore losing more old citations than contemporary citations. If true, this may again partly cancel out with Scopus presumably tending to preferentially index the most prestigious journals, therefore increasing the average number of citations per indexed article. 4. LIMITATIONS The results are limited by the dates of the searches conducted and will be changed by any Scopus retrospective coverage increase. There is a small discrepancy between the total num- ber of journal articles analyzed here (56,029,494) and the 56,391,519 reported by the Scopus web interface for the corresponding query, DOCTYPE(ar) AND SRCTYPE( j) AND PUBYEAR>1899 AND PUBYEAR<2021. The missing 362,025 journal articles seem too few (0.6%) to influence the analysis. The difference may derive partly from minor expansions of Scopus 1996–2013 after 2018, such as by adding the back catalogues of journals first indexed after 2018, especially megajournals, or by fixing indexing inconsistencies, such as reclassify- ing some documents as journal articles. There may also be technical issues with the API availability or processing that the consistency checks did not find. An interpretation limitation for the analysis of abstracts is that is it not clear whether Scopus is comprehensive in its indexing of article abstracts, when they exist. No tests were performed to check whether articles without abstracts in Scopus had abstracts elsewhere, so this is unknown. One case of the opposite was accidentally found: an abstract in Scopus for the correct article that appeared to have been written afterwards and attached to it by a service that presumably informed Scopus, PsycInfo. Other sources of abstracts that could be compared with Scopus to check for this include Crossref (only publisher-supplied information, not always including abstracts; Waltman, Kramer et al., 2020), PubMed (biomedical science; e.g., Frandsen, Eriksen et al., 2019), and Microsoft Academic (soon to be discontinued; Tay, Martín-Martín, & Hug, 2021). Quantitative Science Studies 47 l D o w n o a d e d f r o m h t t p : / / d i r e c t . m i t . / e d u q s s / a r t i c e - p d l f / / / / / 3 1 3 7 2 0 0 8 3 6 0 q s s _ a _ 0 0 1 7 7 p d . f b y g u e s t t o n 0 7 S e p e m b e r 2 0 2 3 Scopus 1900–2020 5. CONCLUSIONS Overall, the results show that 1996 is no longer a watershed year (cf. Li et al., 2010) for Scopus coverage and that the three watersheds are the two world wars (dips in coverage) and 2004 (start of more rapid expansion and the Scopus launch year). This is true in terms of fields and citations, whereas for abstracts, the key date is the end of the Second World War. For journals, 1980 is another watershed for expanding average journal size and possibly also 2019 for a peak in the number of journals. The results therefore suggest 1946 as a logical earliest starting point for scientometric studies that require the longest reasonably consistent coverage. Nevertheless, this seems too long for most practical purposes (e.g., tracking the evolution of a journal over time) and the following practical suggestions are made to help decide on a suitable start year. (cid:129) Choose a starting year that is a watershed for the field(s) investigated, if relevant, and report any anomalies identified above during the period that might influence the results. All data is online for this https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.16834198. (cid:129) Set thresholds for the minimum number of articles, articles with abstracts, or average citation counts for the purposes of the study and use the graphs above to select the earliest year above the thresholds. (cid:129) If conducting a science-wide or international study, set thresholds for internationality or national field coverage and use the graphs above to select the earliest year above the thresholds. Also carefully consider the implications of the increasingly wide cov- erage of Scopus for more recent years. (cid:129) Explicitly acknowledge that the nature of the journal literature has changed during the years of the study in ways that cannot fully be considered, such as constantly expand- ing numbers and (for most periods) sizes of journals, and the international composi- tion of authors. (cid:129) If using citation counts from before 2004, acknowledge that long-term trends will be influenced by lower average citations for earlier years, whether using a fixed citation window or counting citations to date. Lower level biases may also influence other years, however, as the publishing process evolves (e.g., speed, indexing). The findings about abstracts are important for all articles that use long-term literature searches, because a Scopus search spanning from 1900 will be weak due to a lack of abstracts in the early years (e.g., Nsuala, Enslin, & Viljoen, 2015; Sweileh et al., 2019), but more powerful in recent years with near-universal abstract inclusion. Thus, variability in coverage should be considered when reporting or analyzing such results. This issue is particularly important for studies making claims such as “x increased in prevalence over time” based on searches of titles, abstracts, and keywords. Such increases could be artifacts of the more powerful searches in recent years because of the greater prevalence of abstracts. AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS Mike Thelwall: Methodology, Writing—Original draft, Writing—Review & editing. Pardeep Sud: Writing—Review & editing. COMPETING INTERESTS The authors have no competing interests. FUNDING INFORMATION This research was not funded. Quantitative Science Studies 48 l D o w n o a d e d f r o m h t t p : / / d i r e c t . m i t . / e d u q s s / a r t i c e - p d l f / / / / / 3 1 3 7 2 0 0 8 3 6 0 q s s _ a _ 0 0 1 7 7 p d . f b y g u e s t t o n 0 7 S e p e m b e r 2 0 2 3 Scopus 1900–2020 DATA AVAILABILITY The counts underlying the graphs are in the Supplementary material: https://doi.org/10.6084 /m9.figshare.16834198. REFERENCES Abdollahpour, Z., & Gholami, J. (2018). Building blocks of medical abstracts: Frequency, functions and structures of lexical bundles. Asian ESP Journal, 14(1), 83–111. Anonymous. (1944). Editorial. British Journal of Industrial Medicine, 1, 66. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.1.1.66 Atanassova, I., Bertin, M., & Larivière, V. (2016). On the compo- sition of scientific abstracts. Journal of Documentation, 72(4), 636–647. https://doi.org/10.1108/JDOC-09-2015-0111 Anwar, J., Bibi, A., & Ahmad, N. (2021). Behavioral strategy: Mapping the trends, sources and intellectual evolution. Journal of Strategy and Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ JSMA-01 -2021-0002 Baas, J., Schotten, M., Plume, A., Côté, G., & Karimi, R. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019 Beatty, S. (2015). Breaking the 1996 barrier: Scopus adds nearly 4 million pre-1996 articles and more than 83 million references. Scopus Blog. https://blog.scopus.com/posts/breaking-the-1996 -barrier-scopus-adds-nearly-4-million-pre-1996-articles-and -more-than-83 Birkle, C., Pendlebury, D. A., Schnell, J., & Adams, J. (2020). Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 363–376. https://doi .org/10.1162/qss_a_00018 Blatt, E. (2009). Differentiating, describing, and visualizing scien- tific space: A novel approach to the analysis of published scien- tific abstracts. Scientometrics, 80(2), 385–406. https://doi.org/10 .1007/s11192-008-2070-3 Budimir, G., Rahimeh, S., Tamimi, S., & Južnič, P. (2021). Compar- ison of self-citation patterns in WoS and Scopus databases based on national scientific production in Slovenia (1996–2020). Scien- tometrics, 126(3), 2249–2267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192 -021-03862-w Clarivate. (2021). Web of Science platform: Web of Science: Summary of Coverage. https://clarivate.libguides.com /webofscienceplatform/coverage Clark, W. B. (1918). Volumetric determination of reducing sugars. A simplification of scales’method for titrating the reduced copper without removing it from the residual copper solution. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 40(12), 1759–1772. https:// doi.org/10.1021/ja02245a002 Dimensions. (2021). The data in Dimensions. https://www .dimensions.ai/dimensions-data/ Domnina, T. N. (2016). A megajournal as a new type of scientific Information Processing, publication. Scientific and Technical 43(4), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688216040079 Elsevier. (2021). How Scopus works > Contenido. https://www
.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus/how-scopus-works/content
Fairclough, r., & Thelwall, METRO. (2015). More precise methods for
national research citation impact comparisons. Journal of Infor-
métrica, 9(4), 895–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.09.005
Fairclough, r., & Thelwall, METRO. (2021). Questionnaires mentioned in
academic research 1996–2019: Rapid increase but declining
citation impact. Learned Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002
/leap.1417
Frandsen, t. F., Eriksen, METRO. B., Hammer, D. METRO. GRAMO., & Christensen,
j. B. (2019). PubMed coverage varied across specialties and over
tiempo: A large-scale study of included studies in Cochrane
reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 112, 59–66. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.04.015, PubMed: 31051247
Fu, h. Z., & A, Y. S. (2013). Independent research of China in sci-
ence citation index expanded during 1980–2011. Diario de
Informetrics, 7(1), 210–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2012
.11.005, PubMed: 32288781
Gasparyan, A. y., & Kitas, GRAMO. D. (2021). Editorial strategy to get a
scholarly journal indexed by Scopus. Mediterranean Journal of
Rheumatology, 32(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.31138/mjr.32.1.1,
PubMed: 34386695
Grishchenko, A. I. (2019). The Church Slavonic Song of Songs trans-
lated from a Jewish source in the Ruthenian Codex from the 1550s
(RSL Mus. 8222): A new revised diplomatic edition. Scrinium, 15(1),
111–131. https://doi.org/10.1163/18177565-00151P08
Gu, X., & Blackmore, k. l. (2016). Recent trends in academic jour-
nal growth. cienciometria, 108(2), 693–716. https://doi.org/10
.1007/s11192-016-1985-3
Herzog, C., Hook, D., & Konkiel, S. (2020). Dimensions: trayendo
down barriers between scientometricians and data. Quantitative
Science Studies, 1(1), 387–395. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a
_00020
Hollander, F. (1954). The abstract section. Gastroenterology, 26(2),
319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5085(54)80132-6
Hyland, C. j. (2017). English-Canadian social science, humanidades,
and law academic secondments during the Second World War
and their contributions to Canadian external affairs. Internacional
Journal of Canadian Studies, 56, 81–114. https://doi.org/10.3138
/ijcs.56.2017-0004
Jayaratne, Y. S. NORTE., & Zwahlen, R. A. (2015). The evolution of dental
journals from 2003 a 2012: A bibliometric analysis. MÁS UNO,
10(3), e0119503. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119503,
PubMed: 25781486
Jimenez, S., Avila, y., Dueñas, GRAMO., & Gelbukh, A. (2020). Automatic
prediction of citability of scientific articles by stylometry of their
titles and abstracts. cienciometria, 125(3), 3187–3232. https://
doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03526-1
Jin, T., Duan, h., Lu, X., En, J., & guo, k. (2021). Do research
articles with more readable abstracts receive higher online
atención? Evidence from Science. cienciometria, 126(10),
8471–8490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04112-9
Kallens, PAG. C., & Valle, R. (2018). Exploratory mapping of theoretical
landscapes through word use in abstracts. cienciometria, 116(3),
1641–1674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2811-x
kim, E.-S., & Sotavento, E.-J. (2020). A corpus-based study of lexical bun-
dles and moves by English L1 and L2 writers in medical journal
abstracts. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 20,
768–800. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2021.18.1.9.142
Larivière, v., Gingras, y., & Archambault, É. (2009). The decline in
the concentration of citations, 1900–2007. Journal of the
American Society for Information Science and Technology,
60(4), 858–862. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21011
li, J., Burnham, j. F., Lemley, T., & Britton, R. METRO. (2010). Citación
análisis: Comparison of Web of Science®, Scopus™, SciFinder®,
Estudios de ciencias cuantitativas
49
yo
D
oh
w
norte
oh
a
d
mi
d
F
r
oh
metro
h
t
t
pag
:
/
/
d
i
r
mi
C
t
.
metro
i
t
.
/
mi
d
tu
q
s
s
/
a
r
t
i
C
mi
–
pag
d
yo
F
/
/
/
/
/
3
1
3
7
2
0
0
8
3
6
0
q
s
s
_
a
_
0
0
1
7
7
pag
d
.
F
b
y
gramo
tu
mi
s
t
t
oh
norte
0
7
S
mi
pag
mi
metro
b
mi
r
2
0
2
3
Scopus 1900–2020
and Google Scholar. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical
Libraries, 7(3), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/15424065
.2010.505518
Liu, w., Huang, METRO., & Wang, h. (2021). Same journal but different
numbers of published records indexed in Scopus and Web of
Science Core Collection: Causes, consequences, and solutions.
cienciometria, 126(5), 4541–4550. https://doi.org/10.1007
/s11192-021-03934-x
Luna-Morales, METRO. MI., Collazo-Reyes, F., Russell, j. METRO., & Pérez-
Angón, METRO. Á. (2009). Early patterns of scientific production by
Mexican researchers in mainstream journals, 1900–1950. Diario
of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,
60(7), 1337–1348. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21065
Mabe, METRO., & Amin, METRO. (2001). Growth dynamics of scholarly and
scientific journals. cienciometria, 51(1), 147–162. https://doi.org
/10.1023/A:1010520913124
Maflahi, NORTE., & Thelwall, METRO. (2021). Domestic researchers with
longer careers generate higher average citation impact but it
does not increase over time. Estudios de ciencias cuantitativas, 2(2),
560–587. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00132
Manzer, B. METRO. (1977). The abstract journal, 1790–1920. Origin,
development and diffusion. Metuchen, Nueva Jersey: The Scarecrow Press.
Martín-Martín, A., Thelwall, METRO., Orduna-Malea, MI., & López-Cózar,
mi. D. (2021). Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus,
Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: A
multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations. Sciento-
métrica, 126(1), 871–906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020
-03690-4, PubMed: 32981987
Molinero, C. METRO. (1992). Operational research: From war to com-
munity. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 26(3), 203–212.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0121(92)90011-S
Mongeon, PAG., & Casa de Pablo, A. (2016). La cobertura periodística de la Web
de Ciencia y Scopus: Un análisis comparativo. cienciometria,
106(1), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
Nakayama, T., Hirai, NORTE., Yamazaki, S., & Naito, METRO. (2005).
Adoption of structured abstracts by general medical journals
and format for a structured abstract. Journal of the Medical
Library Association, 93(2), 237–242. PubMed: 15858627
Nsuala, B. NORTE., Enslin, GRAMO., & Viljoen, A. (2015). “Wild cannabis”: A
review of the traditional use and phytochemistry of Leonotis
leonurus. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 174, 520–539. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2015.08.013, PubMed: 26292023
Pilkington, A., & Meredith, j. (2009). The evolution of the intellec-
tual structure of operations management 1980–2006: A
citation/co-citation analysis. Journal of Operations Management,
27(3), 185–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2008.08.001
Porturas, T., & taylor, R. A. (2021). Forty years of emergency medicine
investigación: Uncovering research themes and trends through topic
modelado. American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 45, 213–220.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2020.08.036, PubMed: 33059985
Pranckutė, R. (2021). Web of Science ( WoS) y Scopus: The titans
of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. Publica-
ciones, 9(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012
Pressey, S. l. (1917). Distinctive features in psychological test mea-
surements made upon dementia praecox and chronic alcoholic
patients. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 12(2), 130. https://doi
.org/10.1037/h0070284
Precio, D. d. S. (1976). A general theory of bibliometric and other
cumulative advantage processes. Journal of the American Society
for Information Science, 27(5), 292–306. https://doi.org/10.1002
/asi.4630270505
Precio, GRAMO. B. (2017). The founding of Mathematical Reviews. https://
www.ams.org/publications/math-reviews/GBaleyPrice.pdf
Schotten, METRO., Meester, W.. J., Steiginga, S., & ross, C. A. (2017). A
brief history of Scopus: The world’s largest abstract and citation
database of scientific literature. In F. j. Cantú-Ortiz (Ed.), Investigación
Analytics (páginas. 31–58). Nueva York: Auerbach Publications. https://
doi.org/10.1201/9781315155890-3
Seglen, PAG. oh. (1992). The skewness of science. Journal of the Amer-
ican Society for Information Science, 43(9), 628–638. https://doi
.org/10.1002/(CIENCIA)1097-4571(199210)43:9<628::AID-ASI5>3.0
.CO;2-0
Siegmund-Schultze, R. (1994). “Scientific control” in mathematical
reviewing and German-US-American relations between the two
World Wars. Historia Mathematica, 21(3), 306–329. https://doi
.org/10.1006/hmat.1994.1027
Siler, K., Larivière, v., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2020). The diverse niches
of megajournals: Specialism within generalism. Journal of the
Association for Information Science and Technology, 71(7),
800–816. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24299
singh, V. K., singh, PAG., Karmakar, METRO., Leta, J., & Mayr, PAG. (2021). El
journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A
comparative analysis. cienciometria, 126(6), 5113–5142.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03948-5
Herrero, D. R. (2009). The historical development of academic jour-
nals in occupational medicine, 1901–2009. Archives of Environ-
mental & Occupational Health, 64(Suplemento. 1), 8–17. https://doi
.org/10.1080/19338240903284672, PubMed: 20007113
Stegehuis, C., Litvak, NORTE., & waltman, l. (2015). Predicting the
long-term citation impact of recent publications. Journal of Infor-
métrica, 9(3), 642–657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.06.005
Subbotin, A., & Aref, S. (2021). Brain drain and brain gain in Russia:
Analyzing international migration of researchers by discipline
using Scopus bibliometric data 1996–2020. cienciometria,
126(9), 7875–7900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04091-x
Sweileh, W.. METRO., Al-Jabi, S. w., Zyoud, S. mi. h., Shraim, norte. y.,
Anayah, F. METRO., … AbuTaha, A. S. (2019). Bibliometric analysis
of global publications in medication adherence (1900–2017).
International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 27(2), 112–120.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijpp.12471, PubMed: 30044514
Tay, A., Martín-Martín, A., & Hug, S. mi. (2021). Goodbye, Microsoft
Academic–hello, open research infrastructure? Impact of
Social Sciences Blog. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/111325/1
/impactofsocialsciences_2021_05_27_goodbye_microsoft
_academic_hello.pdf
Teschke, o., Wegner, B., & Werner, D. (2011). Glimpses into the
history of Zentralblatt MATH. In O. Teschke, B. Wegner, & D.
Werner (Editores.), 80 Years of Zentralblatt MATH (páginas. 1-dieciséis). Berlina:
Saltador. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21172-0_1
Thelwall, METRO. (2016). The precision of the arithmetic mean, geomet-
ric mean and percentiles for citation data: An experimental
simulation modelling approach. Journal of Informetrics, 10(1),
110–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.12.001
Thelwall, METRO. (2018). Dimensions: A competitor to Scopus and the
Web of Science? Journal of Informetrics, 12(2), 430–435. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.03.006
Wallace, METRO. l., Larivière, v., & Gingras, Y. (2009). Modeling a
century of citation distributions. Journal of Informetrics, 3(4),
296–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2009.03.010
waltman, l., Kramer, B., Hendricks, GRAMO., & Vickery, B. (2020). Open
abstracts: Where are we? https://www.crossref.org/ blog/open
-abstracts-where-are-we/
Estudios de ciencias cuantitativas
50
yo
D
oh
w
norte
oh
a
d
mi
d
F
r
oh
metro
h
t
t
pag
:
/
/
d
i
r
mi
C
t
.
metro
i
t
.
/
mi
d
tu
q
s
s
/
a
r
t
i
C
mi
–
pag
d
yo
F
/
/
/
/
/
3
1
3
7
2
0
0
8
3
6
0
q
s
s
_
a
_
0
0
1
7
7
pag
d
.
F
b
y
gramo
tu
mi
s
t
t
oh
norte
0
7
S
mi
pag
mi
metro
b
mi
r
2
0
2
3
