RESEARCH ARTICLE

Task-Induced Functional Connectivity of Picture
Naming in Healthy Aging: The Impacts of Age
and Task Complexity

a n o p e n a c c e s s

j o u r n a l

Perrine Ferré1, Julien Jarret1

, Simona Maria Brambati1,2, Pierre Bellec1,2

, and Yves Joanette1

1Centre de recherche de l’Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
2Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada

Keywords: fMRI, functional connectivity, healthy aging, picture naming, lingua, task-induced
functional connectivity

ABSTRACT

The topological organization of the brain, governed by the capacity of brain regions to
synchronize their activity, allows for cost-effective performance during everyday cognitive
activity. Functional connectivity is an fMRI method deemed task-specific and demand-
dependent. Although the brain undergoes significant changes during healthy aging,
conceptual knowledge and word-production accuracy are generally preserved. IL
exploration of task-induced functional connectivity patterns during active picture naming may
thus provide additional information about healthy functional cerebral mechanisms that are
specifically adapted to the cognitive activity at hand. The goal of this study is to assess and
describe age-related differences in functional connectivity during an overt picture-naming
task, as well as to compare age-related differences under complex task demand, defined by
lexical frequency. Results suggest both age-specific and task-specific mechanisms. Nel
context of preserved behavioral performance in a picture-naming task, older adults show a
complex array of differences in functional connectivity architecture, including both increases
and decreases. In brief, there is increased segregation and specialization of regions that are
classically assigned to naming processes. Results also expand on previous word-production
studies and suggest that motor regions are particularly subject to age-related differences. Questo
study also provides the first indication that intrinsic task demand, as manipulated by lexical
frequency, interacts little with the relationship between age and functional connectivity.
Together, these findings confirm the value of task-induced functional connectivity analysis in
revealing the brain organization that subserves task performance during healthy aging.

INTRODUCTION

The aging of the population worldwide creates both immense opportunities and numerous
challenges regarding health and wellness. This critical demographic change is compelling
neuroscientists to engage in studies of cognition in aging, so they can better understand the
constituents of cognitive health, which is central to quality of life (WHO, 2018). Although
many cognitive abilities typically decline with healthy aging, conceptual knowledge is long
preserved (Ben-David, Erel, Goy, & Schneider, 2015; Goulet, Ska, & Kahn, 1994; Salthouse,
2014). Its impairment may be an early marker of major or mild neurocognitive disorders
(Blackwell et al., 2004; Mugnaio, Rogers, Siddarth, & Small, 2005; Reilly, Peelle, Antonucci, &
Grossman, 2011). The assessment of conceptual knowledge classically includes picture

Citation: Ferré, P., Jarret, J., Brambati,
S. M., Bellec, P., & Joanette, Y. (2020).
Task-induced functional connectivity of
picture naming in healthy aging: IL
impacts of age and task complexity.
Neurobiology of Language, 1(2)
161–184. https://doi.org/10.1162/
nol_a_00007

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1162/nol_a_00007

Supporting Information:
https://doi.org/10.1162/nol_a_00007

Received: 30 settembre 2019
Accepted: 04 Marzo 2020

Competing Interests: The authors have
declared that no competing interests
exist.

Corresponding Author:
Perrine Ferré
perrine.ferre@umontreal.ca

Handling Editor:
Jonathan Peelle

Copyright: © 2020 Massachusetts
Institute of Technology. Pubblicato
under a Creative Commons Attribution
4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0) licenza.

The MIT Press

l

D
o
w
N
o
UN
D
e
D

F
R
o
M
H

T
T

P

:
/
/

D
io
R
e
C
T
.

M

io
T
.

e
D
tu
N
o

/

l
/

l

UN
R
T
io
C
e
–
P
D

F
/

/

/

/

1
2
1
6
1
1
8
6
7
6
9
1
N
o
_
UN
_
0
0
0
0
7
P
D

.

/

l

F

B
sì
G
tu
e
S
T

T

o
N
0
7
S
e
P
e
M
B
e
R
2
0
2
3

Naming functional connectivity in aging

naming, a sensitive word-production test at the core of many clinical assessment tools (per esempio.,
intraoperative language mapping, differential diagnosis; Moritz-Gasser, Herbet, & Duffau, 2013).
Although older individuals often complain about proper name retrieval (Condret-Santi et al.,
2013), they often obtain accuracy scores similar to those of younger adults when naming pictures
of common names. Yet, this typically occurs at the expense of longer response times (Baciu et al.,
2016; Hoyau et al., 2017; Wierenga et al., 2008) in possible relation with a general slowing in
information processing (Feyereisen, Demaeght, & Samson, 1998). The dissociation between time
and accuracy makes this task particularly interesting, as it suggests that older adults engage in
adaptive mechanisms to perform it adequately. This study thus aims to explore the specific neuro-
functional processes that underlie picture naming, a preserved cognitive ability.

The field of cognitive neuroscience of aging (Cabeza, Nyberg, & Park, 2016) has revealed a
dynamic interplay between declines in structural and functional resources and plasticity phe-
nomena that support cognitive performance. Consistent patterns of enhanced recruitment with
older age, including greater prefrontal bilateral activation, have been found across many cog-
nitive tasks using task-induced blood oxygen level–dependent (BOLD) amplitude activation dif-
ferences (Cabeza, 2002; Davis, Dennis, Daselaar, Fleck, & Cabeza, 2008). Such manifestations
of functional brain adaptation potentially relate to greater demands for cognitive-control pro-
cesses in older adults (Park & Reuter-Lorenz, 2009; Schneider-Garces et al., 2010). When
age-related differences such as decreased specificity and more diffuse brain activity are not as-
sociated with performance, a dedifferentiation phenomenon is invoked (Cabeza et al., 2018).
Although such phenomena have generally been explored using abilities known to decline with
age, less is known about the functional organization that sustains a well-preserved ability.

Older individuals may exhibit longer latencies and phonological imprecision (Feyereisen,
1997; Goulet et al., 1994; Shafto, James, Abrams, & Tyler, 2017). Some complain about
word-finding difficulties, but mostly so for proper names and with no relation to objective cog-
nitive difficulty (Condret-Santi et al., 2013). Tuttavia, on average, their accuracy is preserved,
sometimes even improved, when a simple common names task is used, where accuracy and not
response time is scored, and when there are few time constraints (LaBarge, Edwards, &
Knesevich, 1986; Salthouse, 2014; Schmitter-Edgecombe, Vesneski, & Jones, 2000;
Verhaegen & Poncelet, 2013; Wierenga et al., 2008). Overall, naming abilities for common
names appear behaviorally preserved when task demand is controlled, at least until 65 years
of age (Salthouse, 2014). Picture naming typically involves an extensive neural network reflect-
ing every cognitive step required to produce a known word. Although many interindividual var-
iations exist, the core areas have been described in young adults (Duffau, Moritz-Gasser, &
Mandonnet, 2014; Friederici & Gierhan, 2013; Price, 2012; Sarubbo et al., 2016). The occipital
cortex and the middle and inferior posterior temporal cortex are involved in the semantic pro-
cessing of visual attributes, along with the orbital inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) for multimodal pro-
cessazione. Together, the opercular IFG, premotor cortex, insula, and inferior parietal and superior
temporal cortex are in charge of phonological processing and articulation. These core areas,
although segregated, do not operate in isolation. In particular, age-related neurofunctional re-
organization will often happen at the scale of networks, if not the whole brain, by changing ac-
tivity interactions between regions (Perry et al., 2015; Tomasi & Volkow, 2012; Tsvetanov et al.,
2016). Così, functional connectivity (FC) is a tool of choice to study neurofunctional mecha-
nisms associated with aging.

FC in healthy aging has been studied mainly using resting-state and associated networks,
such as the default mode network (DMN) (Sala-Llonch, Bartrés-Faz, & Junqué, 2015). L'interno-
tegrity of DMN connectivity appears to be particularly affected by age and related to perfor-
mance (Mak et al., 2017). Generally speaking, a decrease in within-network FC is reported,

Neurobiology of Language

162

l

D
o
w
N
o
UN
D
e
D

F
R
o
M
H

T
T

P

:
/
/

D
io
R
e
C
T
.

M

io
T
.

e
D
tu
N
o

/

l
/

l

UN
R
T
io
C
e
–
P
D

F
/

/

/

/

1
2
1
6
1
1
8
6
7
6
9
1
N
o
_
UN
_
0
0
0
0
7
P
D

/

.

l

F

B
sì
G
tu
e
S
T

T

o
N
0
7
S
e
P
e
M
B
e
R
2
0
2
3

Naming functional connectivity in aging

along with increased FC between functionally related regions (Mak et al., 2017; Sala-Llonch et al.,
2015). This pattern appears in line with previous activation studies that demonstrated decreased
deactivation of the DMN during task performance in older individuals (Persson, Pudas, Nilsson,
& Nyberg, 2014). Examples of increased brain FC with regions belonging to the same functional
network but typically not recruited by younger adults have also been detected using lexicose-
mantic tasks (Agarwal, Stamatakis, Geva, & Warburton, 2016; Hoyau et al., 2018; La et al.,
2016; Marsolais, Perlbarg, Benali, & Joanette, 2014; Muller, Mérillat, & Jäncke, 2016). Some
studies of word production have reported BOLD signal increases in parietal, frontal, or temporal
regions with age (per esempio., Hoyau et al., 2017; Meunier, Stamatakis, & Tyler, 2014), as well as contra-
lateral recruitment (per esempio., La et al., 2016; Meinzer et al., 2012). Along with an impact of age, effects
of behavioral performance and task demand are also expected: A recent meta-analysis focusing on
semantic cognition and aging (Hoffman & Morcom, 2018) concluded that augmented activation
was principally observed when older adults performed worse than younger adults, Per esempio,
during tasks drawing on executive functions.

Tuttavia, some authors have recently argued in favor of state-dependent differences in re-
gional functional connectivity with age (Campbell & Schacter, 2016; Greene, Gao, Scheinost,
& Constable, 2018; Samu et al., 2017). In regard to lexical knowledge, recent evidence points
toward distinct FC patterns for different tasks (per esempio., synonyms, antonyms, picture naming) In
older adults (Ferré et al., 2019; Varangis, Razlighi, Habeck, Fisher, & Stern, 2019).

It is important to note that a task paradigm allows for direct manipulation of the task require-
ments to characterize neural mechanisms that underlie brain-behavior associations and poten-
tial strategic mechanisms (Crowell et al., 2019; Finn et al., 2017; Greene et al., 2018; Persson,
Lustig, Nelson, & Reuter-Lorenz, 2007; Steffener et al., 2014). Prior studies of aging and cog-
nition have concluded that domain-general control processes become more involved when
general cognitive load increases, to which older adults appear particularly sensitive
(Campbell et al., 2016; Park & Reuter-Lorenz, 2009; Peelle, 2019; Wang, Dew, & Cabeza,
2015). Yet, little is known about the impact of manipulating task requirements through psy-
chometric criteria (Cole, Smith, & Beckmann, 2010). Per esempio, lexical frequency influ-
ences brain activity and performance during naming (per esempio., Basso et al., 2013; Burke,
MacKay, Worthley, & Wade, 1991). Infatti, low-frequency words trigger more tip-of-the-
tongue states than high-frequency words (Burke et al., 1991), and older adults have more dif-
ficulty producing the correct name for low-frequency items (Au et al., 1995; LaGrone &
Spieler, 2006; Rogalski, Peelle, & Reilly, 2011). Lexical frequency thus offers another way
to manipulate the requirements of a picture-naming task, using intrinsic task characteristics.

The general aim of this study is to characterize possible age-related differences in task-
induced FC, using a picture-naming task, while considering the impact of lexical frequency
as an indicator of task difficulty.

The first goal was to assess and describe age-related differences in FC of the regions acti-
vated by the picture-naming task as well as in the DMN during word production. On the basis
of previous reports of increased activity during task performance, older adults were expected
to show higher FC in the regions activated by the task, in relation to greater reliance on lifelong
accumulated semantic knowledge (Agarwal et al., 2016; Hoyau et al., 2018; Marsolais et al.,
2014; Tran et al., 2018) or domain-general control mechanisms (Cabeza et al., 2018; Geerligs,
Maurits, Renken, & Lorist, 2014; La et al., 2016). Decreases in FC within DMN regions, along
with increases in the rest of the brain, are also expected during task performance, in line with
most previous FC studies of aging (Andrews-Hanna et al., 2007; Damoiseaux et al., 2008;
Geerligs et al., 2014).

Neurobiology of Language

163

l

D
o
w
N
o
UN
D
e
D

F
R
o
M
H

T
T

P

:
/
/

D
io
R
e
C
T
.

M

io
T
.

e
D
tu
N
o

/

l
/

l

UN
R
T
io
C
e
–
P
D

F
/

/

/

/

1
2
1
6
1
1
8
6
7
6
9
1
N
o
_
UN
_
0
0
0
0
7
P
D

/

.

l

F

B
sì
G
tu
e
S
T

T

o
N
0
7
S
e
P
e
M
B
e
R
2
0
2
3

Naming functional connectivity in aging

The second goal of the study was to describe the differential impact of lexical frequency on FC
as a function of age. Differences between conditions were expected to be larger for older adults
and to indicate enhanced connectivity, as a result of more demanding psycholinguistic process-
ing and as observed in the context of greater task demand (Avelar-Pereira, Bäckman, Wåhlin,
Nyberg, & Salami, 2017; Campbell & Schacter, 2016; Dixon et al., 2017; Dubois & Adolphs,
2016; Geerligs, Rubinov, & Henson, 2015; Grady, Sarraf, Saverino, & Campbell, 2016).

By gathering such a task-specific set of information, this study offers a baseline for further
exploration of adaptive mechanisms subserving the preservation of cognition throughout life.

METHOD

Population

Seventy-two participants (38 young adults, 34 older adults) gave their informed consent to
participate in this study, in accordance with local ethics committee guidelines. Participants
were native French speakers and right-handed, and were free of neurological disorders and
a history of drug or alcohol dependency, major depression, or moderate to severe auditory
or visual disorders. Adults 65-years-old or older underwent a cognitive and hearing screening.
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (Nasreddine et al., 2005) was used to test for mild cogni-
tive impairment, with a standard cutoff score of 26. A pure-tone test was used to ensure that all
older participants had hearing acuity within ISO standard 7029:2000. Inoltre, extensive
screening questionnaires were used to exclude participants with MRI contraindications. IL
final sample, after quality control of fMRI preprocessing, included 37 young adults and 31 older
adults (Tavolo 1).

Task Design

Participants were asked to complete an overt object naming task during fMRI data acquisition:
The Boston Naming Test (BNT) (Goodglass, Kaplan, & Weintraub, 1983). The BNT is among
the most widely used picture-naming tasks in both clinical and experimental settings. It was
therefore considered to provide a basis for knowledge development. Participants were asked

Tavolo 1. Demographic and behavioral characteristics

Age group
Mean age (SD)

Sex (male/female)

Mean years of education (SD)

[min–max]

Mean accuracy (SD) [min–max]

BNT

BNT – easy condition

BNT – hard condition

18–35 (N = 37)
26 (5.2)

61–80 (N = 31)
70 (5.5)

21/16

12/19

14 (3.3) [9–20]

14 (3.4) [11–21]

45 (7.7) [24–57]

27 (2.9) [23–30]

18 (5.1) [7–27]

48 (5.5) [34–55]

28 (2.2) [26–30]

17 (3.9) [9–25]

BNT – reaction time (seconds)

1284 (189.3) [959–1815]

1423 (208.1) [1001–1906]

MoCA

–

28 (1.2) [26–30]

BNT, Boston Naming Test; MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment.

Neurobiology of Language

164

l

D
o
w
N
o
UN
D
e
D

F
R
o
M
H

T
T

P

:
/
/

D
io
R
e
C
T
.

M

io
T
.

e
D
tu
N
o

/

l
/

l

UN
R
T
io
C
e
–
P
D

F
/

/

/

/

1
2
1
6
1
1
8
6
7
6
9
1
N
o
_
UN
_
0
0
0
0
7
P
D

/

.

l

F

B
sì
G
tu
e
S
T

T

o
N
0
7
S
e
P
e
M
B
e
R
2
0
2
3

Naming functional connectivity in aging

to name the pictures they saw on the screen aloud, as fast as possible. Word-production pro-
cesses occur rapidly, typically within 600 ms of seeing an object (Indefrey & Levelt, 2004).
Pilot acquisitions with both young and healthy older adults occurred before settling on the
final task paradigm.

Each of the 60 BNT stimuli was presented for 1,500 ms, and participants had an additional
1,500 ms to give their answer before the next trial. A long allowable response time was pre-
ferred because it is only after 700 ms that neurofunctional response to the tip-of-the-tongue
phenomenon is typically observed (Shafto & Tyler, 2014); Inoltre, the pilot acquisitions sug-
gested the same thing. Many previous FC studies used resting-state and offline performance
measures (Sala-Llonch et al., 2015), but those methods are suspected of reflecting the actual
cognitive processes during the task less closely (Campbell & Schacter, 2016; Tran et al., 2018).
Così, an overt naming task was preferred in this study. An interstimulus interval of 350 ms
separated the stimuli. A fixation cross indicated the end of the trial. The task was composed
Di 12 blocks lasting 17.5 S, with five images each to be named. The blocks were separated by
rest epochs (fixation cross) lasting 17.5 S, for a total of 145 volumes. Half of the blocks had a
low frequency (high requirement) level. Linguistic complexity was defined by the lexical fre-
quency obtained from the French lexical database lexique3 (http://lexique.org/). To validate
the assumption that a frequent item should generally be named successfully, each item’s cat-
egorization was compared with the success rate of the test item from the French norms: A word
designated as frequent systematically triggered 80% success (Roberts & Doucet, 2011).

Behavioral Analysis

Precisione (number of correct responses given in the maximum time window) and response
times (RTs) for all naming trials were first analyzed to determine whether task performance
was similar across age groups. Three trained raters independently scored the accuracy results
and reached a consensus. Age groups were compared for their total score as well as each
frequency level using two independent sample t tests. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) tested
the relationship between age group and accuracy or RT for each frequency level. No devia-
tions from homoscedasticity or normality were observed. Three individuals were excluded
from the behavioral analysis because of technical issues resulting in missing data (per esempio., un-
plugged microphone, inaudible answer). Tavolo 1 presents all the behavioral results.

fMRI Scanning and Data Processing

MRI images were acquired with a 32-channel head coil and a 3T SIEMENS TrioTim magnetic
resonance imaging system. Participants were instructed to limit their movement to the extent
possible, and a practice session was held before the scanning session to ensure they knew how
to limit their movement. Foam rubber pads within the head coil also restricted head movement.
Earplugs reduced scanner noise. A microphone was oriented toward the mouth to allow vocal
recording, using MR Confon (https://www.crsltd.com/tools-for-functional-imaging/audio-for-
fmri/mr-confon/). When necessary, vision was corrected using MRI-175 compatible lenses that
matched the distance prescription used by the participant. The task stimuli were presented using
DMDX presentation software (Forster & Forster, 2003).

Anatomical images (T1) were acquired with a Multi echo multi planar rapid gradient echo
pulse sequence and a Generalized autocalibrating partial parallel acquisition (GRAPPA) ac-
celeration factor using the following parameters: field of view (FoV) = 256.0 mm2, matrix size =
256 × 256, 176 slices covering whole brain, 1 mm isotropic voxel size, echo time/repetition time
(TE/TR) = 1.64/253 ms, flip angle = 7.0°.

Neurobiology of Language

165

l

D
o
w
N
o
UN
D
e
D

F
R
o
M
H

T
T

P

:
/
/

D
io
R
e
C
T
.

M

io
T
.

e
D
tu
N
o

/

l
/

l

UN
R
T
io
C
e
–
P
D

F
/

/

/

/

1
2
1
6
1
1
8
6
7
6
9
1
N
o
_
UN
_
0
0
0
0
7
P
D

.

/

l

F

B
sì
G
tu
e
S
T

T

o
N
0
7
S
e
P
e
M
B
e
R
2
0
2
3

Naming functional connectivity in aging

Functional images (T2*) were acquired with an echo-planar imaging pulse sequence and a
GRAPPA acceleration factor using the following parameters: FoV = 220 × 220 mm, matrix size =
74 × 74, 50 ascending slices covering the whole brain, 3 mm isotropic voxel size, TR/TE =
3,000/20 ms, flip angle = 90°. T2* image acquisition was oriented −30° from the anterior
commissure–posterior commissure line (to reduce the signal loss from the anterior temporal
lobes). The first five volumes of each run were automatically discarded during acquisition.

Preprocessing

Preprocessing of structural and BOLD functional metrics was done using SPM12 (http://www.
fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/) and CONN toolboxes (v.18.b; www.nitrc.org/projects/conn) imple-
mented in Matlab 2015b (https://www.mathworks.com/). Functional images were first coregis-
tered and realigned to account for minor head motion using the CONN preprocessing
pipeline.

Using the VBM12 toolbox in SPM12 (http://dbm.neuro.uni-jena.de/wordpress/vbm/), core-
gistered structural (T1) images were segmented into gray matter, white matter, and cerebrospi-
nal fluid, with a sampling of 1.5 mm × 1.5 mm × 1.5 mm using trilinear interpolation. Dopo
segmentation, we performed image normalization using Diffeomorphic Anatomical
Registration through Exponentiated Lie (DARTEL; Ashburner, 2007) to create a custom tem-
plate. The flow field images obtained during the DARTEL template creation were used to warp
all realigned functional images and the coregistered structural images into the Montreal
Neurological Institute (MNI) spazio. Images were modulated by multiplying the Jacobian de-
formation parameters defined during normalization to preserve the total amount of original
gray matter before normalization (Ashburner & Friston, 2005; Zhu et al., 2013). Prossimo, the mod-
ulated/warped images were smoothed with a 6 mm full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) iso-
tropic Gaussian kernel and normalized into the MNI space.

Functional images were coregistered to the structural T1 images obtained during the pre-
vious realignment step using CONN options. Smoothed normalized images were entered in
the CONN toolbox.

A motion-censoring procedure was applied to remove unwanted motion, physiological,
and other artifactual effects from the BOLD signal. An ART-based functional outlier detection
method was used, as implemented in the CONN toolbox (Mazaika, Whitfield, & Cooper,
2005). The threshold was established using the maximum voxel displacement with a scrub-
bing criterion established at 0.9 mm scan-to-scan head motion or global signal intensity 5 SD
above the mean signal for the session (Mazaika, Hoeft, Glover, & Reiss, 2009; Whitfield-
Gabrieli & Nieto-Castanon, 2012). A dummy variable represented each outlier in the first-level
denoising step. The mean number of invalid scans was 4.84, O 3.34% of the total number of
volumes. Three participants who presented more than 25% outliers out of their total volumes
were excluded from further FC analysis.

An anatomical component-based noise correction method was also applied (Behzadi,
Restom, Liau, & Liu, 2007), regressing the white matter and cerebrospinal fluid from the
BOLD signal. This method has proven useful to improve the specificity of connectivity mea-
surements (Muschelli et al., 2014), and it partially reduced the effect of vascular health on FC
measures (Geerligs, Tsvetanov, & Henson, 2017).

The six realignment parameters (with their first temporal derivatives) and the task effect

(BOLD time series orthogonalization to task effects) were also included as regressors.

Neurobiology of Language

166

l

D
o
w
N
o
UN
D
e
D

F
R
o
M
H

T
T

P

:
/
/

D
io
R
e
C
T
.

M

io
T
.

e
D
tu
N
o

/

l
/

l

UN
R
T
io
C
e
–
P
D

F
/

/

/

/

1
2
1
6
1
1
8
6
7
6
9
1
N
o
_
UN
_
0
0
0
0
7
P
D

/

.

l

F

B
sì
G
tu
e
S
T

T

o
N
0
7
S
e
P
e
M
B
e
R
2
0
2
3

Naming functional connectivity in aging

Finalmente, a high-pass filter (<0.01 Hz) was applied after nuisance regression, to filter signals related to physiological or motion artifacts (Muschelli et al., 2014; Satterthwaite et al., 2013). A high-pass filter has been demonstrated to produce stronger, more reliable age effects than a bandpass filter (Geerligs et al., 2017). Quality assessment was performed before and after denoising, by visually inspecting the overlay of functional and structural individual realigned images, the overlay of the functional images and the MNI template, as well as the BOLD functional time points movie and distri- bution of the scrubbed volumes across time. One participant was excluded from further FC analysis because of an isolated but massive amplitude movement. No other anomalies were noted. In total, 4 participants were excluded of the initial 72. The remaining sample was com- posed of 68 individuals: 37 young adults and 31 older adults. Functional connectivity fMRI analysis Regions of interest (ROIs) were defined based on the BOLD signal characterizing the execution of the naming task (the main effect of naming contrast). This method reduces the number of observations and guides the FC data analysis. Reduction allows for easier and clearer interpre- tation and is deemed a simple yet powerful method (Fjell & Walhovd, 2016). Task-induced ROI definition. A data-driven approach using a task- and sample-specific template was favored over canonical resting-state networks because the latter may be less sensitive to task-related changes in network connectivity (Crowell et al., 2019; Davis, Stanley, Moscovitch, & Cabeza, 2017). For example, several of the networks found in the left perisylvian language regions during active language tasks (e.g., left inferior frontal, posterior temporal, and inferior parietal cortices) may appear as a single network of correlated regions using a resting state (Jackson, Hoffman, Pobric, & Lambon Ralph, 2015; Liljeström, Stevenson, Kujala, & Salmelin, 2015; Tran et al., 2018). Thus, seed ROIs were based on the whole brain statistical parametric map of the task main effect for the whole sample. However, to reduce the number of observations and limit redundancy, we selected the activation peaks that best summarized the whole brain activation maps in the whole brain for the whole sample. First, voxel-wise T-maps were constructed for each subject using a task > rest contrast (task
main effect). Second-level group analyses were then performed to test for significant differ-
ences across groups. Activation peaks of the union of the task main effect maps (t tests) in both
age groups were determined. A sphere was centered on each peak with a radius of 7 mm using
MARSBAR (http://marsbar.sourceforge.net). The Euclidean distance between the centroid’s co-
ordinates in the standard MNI space was also calculated, to verify that the distance between
peaks was at least twice the width of the smoothing kernel (cioè., 12 mm).

Secondo, we grouped the activation peaks according to responses during the task and se-
lected the most relevant from each grouping. A one-sample t tests was computed for all partici-
pants using all activation peaks during the task condition. An ROI-to-ROI hierarchical
clustering algorithm sorted all regions and grouped ROIs showing the most similar time series,
using a network-based statistic (NBS; Zalesky, Fornito, & Bullmore, 2010) with a false discov-
ery rate connection-level threshold of p < .0001 at the analysis level. The ROI with the largest size (i.e., the number of suprathreshold connections between this seed and all other ROIs) in each cluster was selected for further seed-to-voxel analysis. To better compare these results with the literature, one additional seed was selected to rep- resent the DMN. Age-related differences in DMN connectivity have indeed been consistently Neurobiology of Language 167 l D o w n o a d e d f r o m h t t p : / / d i r e c t . m i t . e d u n o / l / l a r t i c e - p d f / / / / 1 2 1 6 1 1 8 6 7 6 9 1 n o _ a _ 0 0 0 0 7 p d . / l f b y g u e s t t o n 0 7 S e p e m b e r 2 0 2 3 Naming functional connectivity in aging reported, especially in the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC; Andrews-Hanna et al., 2007; Chan, Alhazmi, Park, Savalia, & Wig, 2017; Geerligs et al., 2014; Kong et al., 2018; Tomasi & Volkow, 2010). In sum, a total of six ROIs were selected for further seed-to-voxel FC analysis. Functional connectivity statistics. The spatial topography of seed-to-voxel FC was examined using the selected ROI spheres defined as seeds in previous steps. Seed-to-voxel connectivity was measured at the first level using an haemodynamic response function-weighted general linear model (which deweights the initial scans within each block). The Fisher transform of the Pearson correlation between each seed time series and all other voxels was calculated. Group-level analysis in CONN implemented repeated-measures analyses using the ReML estimation of covariance components and evaluated through F-statistical parameter maps. Correction for multiple comparisons was done using a combined voxel-level height threshold ( p < .001 uncorrected) and a cluster extent threshold ( p < .05 family-wise error [FWE] corrected). Connectivity maps were automatically labeled by CONN using the anatomy toolbox v2.0 (Eickhoff et al., 2005) and manually checked using the AAL, Tzourio-Mazoyer, and Brodmann atlases. The main contrasts of interest were the differences between age groups in absolute connec- tivity during the task condition—ignoring the fixation epochs—as tested by a two-sample t test for each ROI. Results from a simple linear association in FC studies can lead to misleading interpretations (Ferreira et al., 2016; Geerligs & Henson, 2016; Song et al., 2012). For exam- ple, “increases” in FC may reflect both an increase in the magnitude of a positive correlation or a loss of anticorrelation. To distinguish between processes and support interpretation, within- group mean connectivity maps during the task were thus extracted. The second aim of the study was to investigate how the age effect on FC varies as a function of task demand. The condition (low vs. high frequency) by group (older vs. younger adults) interaction was tested. A 2 × 2 mixed ANOVA between age group and frequency level was computed for each ROI. We were interested in the main effect of condition. The simple main effect of complex- ity in each group (paired t test) and mean within-group FC at each frequency level were explored for every significant interaction to support description and interpretation of the interaction. RESULTS Behavioral Results Mean behavioral performance metrics (accuracy and RTs) were first compared between groups using an ANOVA. Interaction effects were tested by comparing accuracy scores and RTs in each lexical frequency condition for younger and older individuals. The hypothesis regarding both accuracy and reaction times were verified, and although frequency did interact with RT, no main effect of frequency on accuracy scores was observed. As expected, younger (mean = 44.67, SD = 7.69) and older (mean = 43.50, SD = 7.93) adults did not differ significantly in their total BNT accuracy scores (F[1,63] = 0.005, p = 0.946), neither in the high-frequency (F[1,63] = 1.13, p = 0.292) nor in the low-frequency (F[1,63] = 0.89, p = 0.347) condition. Neurobiology of Language 168 l D o w n o a d e d f r o m h t t p : / / d i r e c t . m i t . e d u n o / l / l a r t i c e - p d f / / / / 1 2 1 6 1 1 8 6 7 6 9 1 n o _ a _ 0 0 0 0 7 p d . / l f b y g u e s t t o n 0 7 S e p e m b e r 2 0 2 3 Naming functional connectivity in aging There was a significant difference in the overall mean RT of younger (mean = 1284.24, SD = 189.37) and older (mean = 1417.34, SD = 208.41) adults (F[1,63] = 5.74, p = 0.005). The inter- action between age group and word frequency was significant on RT (F[1,63]= 5.74, p=0.005), and when tested individually, interaction between age and RT is significant for the low frequency (F[1,63]= 10.16, p=0.002) but not the high frequency (F[1,63]= 3.037 p=0.086) condition, show- ing that older adults were significantly slower to answer in the more difficult condition. Identification of the Task-Induced Regions of Interest The thresholded map of the union of both age groups in the naming versus fixation contrast was used to determine peaks of activation in the task-related network. As expected, the nam- ing contrast activated an extensive bilateral occipital-temporal-parietal-frontal circuit in both younger and older adults. The maps of the two age groups were, for the most part, similar (Figure 1). The only significant difference was found in the older > younger contrast in the
right inferior cerebellum lobule VIII (MNI: 27 −54 −46). This cluster was encompassed in a
more massive occipital cluster in the union activation maps, so it was not selected as a distinct
seed in FC analysis.

The task-induced statistical parametric map was composed of 13 clusters. The ROI-to-ROI
analysis revealed that these clusters belonged to five distinct functional clusters: A visual occip-
ital cluster, a sensorimotor cluster, a left frontoparietal cluster, a frontal anterior cluster, and a
posterior superior temporal gyrus (STG) cluster. The seeds that presented the best spatial overlap
and the most similar functional response to each canonical network were the left occipital, left
premotor cortex, left orbital IFG, left opercular IFG, and left posterior superior temporal gyrus.

MNI coordinates for the task-induced activation peaks, along with the NBS functional hi-

erarchical clustering statistics, are presented in Table 2.

One additional ROI was selected in the PCC from among the CONN network ROI list to
represent the DMN (MNI coordinates: x = 1 y = −61 z = 38). Figura 1 illustrates the method
and results of selecting the seed ROIs.

Age-Related Differences in Functional Connectivity

The main goal of this study was to assess and describe age-related differences in task-induced
FC in the regions activated during the naming task.

The effect of age on FC topography during task completion was investigated using a seed-
to-voxel FC for each selected ROI for the task and the PCC (t test between two independent
samples). The mean within-group FC was also computed to better characterize the differences
in topological FC organization. Results are reported with a voxel-level height threshold (P < .001 uncorrected) and a cluster extent threshold (p < .05 FWE corrected) and illustrated in Figure 2. The mean and group difference maps for all other activation peaks are available in Supporting Information 1. Based on previous reports of enhanced differences in FC architecture during a task, older adults were expected to show significant differences in the integration of both the task and default mode networks: decreased FC within the DMN, but increased FC within regions out- side the DMN, as well as increased FC in the task-activated regions with semantic and/or ex- ecutive control regions. The results only partially validated the initial expectations. The task-induced FC architecture presented many similarities between age groups. Although small, significant clusters of age-related differences were nonetheless present for each ROI of the task and the DMN. Both increases and decreases were observed with aging. Neurobiology of Language 169 l D o w n o a d e d f r o m h t t p : / / d i r e c t . m i t . e d u n o / l / l a r t i c e - p d f / / / / 1 2 1 6 1 1 8 6 7 6 9 1 n o _ a _ 0 0 0 0 7 p d . / l f b y g u e s t t o n 0 7 S e p e m b e r 2 0 2 3 Naming functional connectivity in aging l D o w n o a d e d f r o m h t t p : / / d i r e c t . m i t . e d u n o / l / l a r t i c e - p d f / / / / 1 2 1 6 1 1 8 6 7 6 9 1 n o _ a _ 0 0 0 0 7 p d / . l Figure 1. Task-induced seed definition: Task-induced activation maps of younger and older adults, ROI functional hierarchical clustering, and selected seeds. Above: activation clusters in the main contrast of interest (task > riposo) for both younger (in yellow) and older (in cyan)
adults. Overlaps (in green) are observed between younger and older adults in the task contrast. Slice numbers are indicated on the sagittal axis.
Below: Functional hierarchical clustering of the ROI spheres for the task-induced activation peaks. IL 13 activation peaks belonged to five
functional clusters. The most relevant activation peaks are indicated in bright yellow. Per esempio, the left STG shows the largest number of
connections with all other ROIs. Each colored connection (magenta, blue, green, orange) represent the distinct clusters, whereas the width and
opacity are proportional to stats, with the most opaque and greatest width representing the highest connection between regions in each group-
ing. ROI = region of interest; STG = superior temporal gyrus; premotor = premotor cortex; PMA = primary motor area; occ = occipital lobe;
orIFG = orbital inferior frontal gyrus; opIFG = opercular IFG; MTG = middle temporal gyrus; SPL = superior parietal lobule. L = left; R = right.

F

B
sì
G
tu
e
S
T

T

o
N
0
7
S
e
P
e
M
B
e
R
2
0
2
3

Sensorimotor regions within the frontal lobe also exhibited FC increases. In older adults, IL
left primary motor cortex showed an age-related enlargement of ipsilateral connectivity sur-
rounding frontoparietal motor areas (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, middle frontal gyrus, E
caudate nucleus).

Anterior frontal regions (cioè., the orbital IFG) mainly exhibited age-related FC increases in

portions of the left dorsal striatum (caudate and putamen).

In contrasto, there were decreases in the coupling between canonical anterior and posterior
language regions: the left posterior STG ( Wernicke’s area) with the temporal-frontal junction
(temporal pole, inferior frontal orbital cortex, frontal pole, and pars triangularis); as well as the

Neurobiology of Language

170

Naming functional connectivity in aging

Tavolo 2. Task-induced seed definition

Activation Analysis

NBS Hierarchical Clustering Analysis

MNI coordinates of
peak activation (mm)
z
sì
X
−12
−72
−40

Anatomical region
Left occipital lobe

Right occipital lobe

Left posterior superior temporal

gyrus

27

−60

Right posterior superior temporal

50

gyrus

Right middle temporal gyrus

Left opercular inferior frontal

gyrus

Left superior parietal lobule

Left orbital inferior frontal

gyrus

54

−38

−22

−30

−80

−39

−34

−24

6

−66

26

Right orbital inferior frontal

33

27

gyrus

Right insula

Left primary motor area

Right primary motor area

Left premotor cortex

34

−44

50

−60

18

−12

−4

2

Cluster
size
7118

6920

65

70

126

94

159

336

81

49

249

242

133

T peak
value
9

7

12

9

10

10

8

11

10

9

12

11

8

F(56)
35.1

35.8

38.8

39.0

30.7

30.1

14.0

38.8

32.2

18.0

54.9

47.3

27.3

Size
9

Visual

Posterior superior

temporal gyrus

Fronto-parietal

Frontal anterior

Sensorimotor

7

12

9

10

10

8

11

10

9

12

11

8

−10

6

8

−2

30

36

2

−2

8

36

39

21

Bold characters show the activation peaks selected as seeds, the most functionally relevant to the corresponding canonical functional network.

left opIFG (Broca’s area) with the posterior inferior temporal regions (fusiform gyrus). The left
visual occipital regions also showed decreased interaction with the occipital pole and superior
frontal regions.

As anticipated, the DMN showed marked age-related differences in FC. There was de-
creased coupling between the PCC and frontal portions of the DMN (medial prefrontal cortex,
bilateral paracingulate cortex, bilateral middle and superior frontal gyrus, bilateral superior
parietal lobule). Conversely, connectivity increased with nearby posterior regions, most of
which do not correspond to the traditional description of the DMN (angular gyrus, supramar-
ginal gyrus, superior lateral occipital cortex, superior parietal lobule).

Figura 2 and Supplementary Material 1, illustrate a general trend, across both DMN and
task-induced ROIs, for reduced long-range and increased short-range connectivity in older
adults. Per esempio, the left superior parietal lobule seed mainly exhibited age-related in-
creases in FC with surrounding parietal and medial regions (dorsal striatum) but decreases
with distant frontal and temporal areas. Allo stesso modo, the PCC showed increased coupling with
posterior parietal regions but reduced coupling with frontal (medial and lateral) regions in
older adults.

Neurobiology of Language

171

l

D
o
w
N
o
UN
D
e
D

F
R
o
M
H

T
T

P

:
/
/

D
io
R
e
C
T
.

M

io
T
.

e
D
tu
N
o

/

l
/

l

UN
R
T
io
C
e
–
P
D

F
/

/

/

/

1
2
1
6
1
1
8
6
7
6
9
1
N
o
_
UN
_
0
0
0
0
7
P
D

/

.

l

F

B
sì
G
tu
e
S
T

T

o
N
0
7
S
e
P
e
M
B
e
R
2
0
2
3

Naming functional connectivity in aging

These patterns of differences in the regions activated by the task tend to confirm that young
and older adults rely on different neurofunctional and cognitive processes to perform the
word-production task.

The Impact of Lexical Frequency on Age-Related Differences in FC

The final goal of this study was to test whether there was a group difference when manipulating
lexical frequency as an example of a task-specific requirement in a naming task (a condition-
by-group interaction). Within-group statistical maps of between-condition contrasts and mean
FC within age group for each lexical frequency level were computed to support the description
and interpretation of the interaction.

l

D
o
w
N
o
UN
D
e
D

F
R
o
M
H

T
T

P

:
/
/

D
io
R
e
C
T
.

M

io
T
.

e
D
tu
N
o

/

l
/

l

UN
R
T
io
C
e
–
P
D

F
/

/

/

/

1
2
1
6
1
1
8
6
7
6
9
1
N
o
_
UN
_
0
0
0
0
7
P
D

.

/

l

F

B
sì
G
tu
e
S
T

T

o
N
0
7
S
e
P
e
M
B
e
R
2
0
2
3

Figura 2. Age-related differences in functional connectivity. Spatial maps show the seed-based con-
nectivity of six most representative ROIs activated by the task, in addition to the default mode net-
lavoro. For each ROI (yellow sphere) the mean functional connectivity maps are presented for the older
group, the younger group, and the difference between age groups (OA > YA). Per esempio, older
adults showed decreased coupling between the left posterior STG and the anterior IFG-insula region,
compared with younger adults. ROI = region of interest; OA = older adult; YA = young adult; IFG =
inferior frontal gyrus; opIFG = opercular inferior frontal gyrus; orIFG = orbital inferior frontal gyrus;
occ = occipital lobe; STG = superior temporal gyrus; PCC = posterior cingulate cortex. L = left.

Neurobiology of Language

172

Naming functional connectivity in aging

The manipulation of lexical frequency yielded a significant age-by-condition interaction for
the left occipital ROI only. Contradicting the initial expectation, there was no systematic ev-
idence of greater differences between conditions in FC in older adults than in young adults.

A simple main-effects analysis indicated double dissociations in each significant effect. As
expected, older adults showed increased FC with lower lexical frequency (the more challeng-
ing condition). Young adults, on the contrary, showed anti-correlated FC between each pair of
regions in the same condition (Figura 3).

The left occipital ROI showed a significant interaction in coupling with the right posterior
inferior temporal gyrus/fusiform gyrus and the right superior cerebellum. As can be seen in
Supplementary Figure 1, the right insula, which was not selected as one of the most represen-
tative seeds, also exhibited an increase in FC with the right inferior cerebellum (I and VI). For
the latter, although the age-by-condition interaction was significant, it did not reach statistical
significance at the within-group level (main effect of condition in each group).

DISCUSSION

This study proposed a structured exploration of the FC characteristics revealed in healthy older
adults during picture naming, a cognitive ability that is central to human functioning and widely
used in clinical cognitive assessments. Most previous FC studies used the resting state to exam-
ine cognitive activity. Tuttavia, it was felt that task-induced FC is better adapted to describe
possible changes in FC that are specific to the cognitive activity. By using seed-based FC during
picture naming, while regressing the task effect and carefully controlling for major confounds,

l

D
o
w
N
o
UN
D
e
D

F
R
o
M
H

T
T

P

:
/
/

D
io
R
e
C
T
.

M

io
T
.

e
D
tu
N
o

/

l
/

l

UN
R
T
io
C
e
–
P
D

F
/

/

/

/

1
2
1
6
1
1
8
6
7
6
9
1
N
o
_
UN
_
0
0
0
0
7
P
D

.

/

l

F

B
sì
G
tu
e
S
T

T

o
N
0
7
S
e
P
e
M
B
e
R
2
0
2
3

Figura 3.
Interaction between age and lexical frequency: Spatial maps and mean FC values of
interaction between age and lexical frequency on task-induced FC. Spatial maps (on the left) show
the significant interaction effect, FWE thresholded. Bars and whiskers on the right denote FC effect
size for each group (younger and older adults) in each condition (high and low lexical frequency).
Across-group differences in FC effect sizes are given above the bars. FC = functional connectivity;
FWE = family-wise error; occ = occipital lobe; ITG = ; L = left; R = right.

Neurobiology of Language

173

Naming functional connectivity in aging

this study confirms some of the initial hypotheses but also expands upon prior knowledge sur-
rounding word production in aging.

In brief, the results show that, although the brain topography of picture naming is very similar
in younger and older adults, the FC architecture underlying naming exhibits significant differ-
enze. In older adults, there is less coupling of the traditionally described core structures of
language acquisition (per esempio., Broca’s and Wernicke’s areas), along with enhanced FC in regions
involved in both semantic retrieval and motor control. This study also provides the first evi-
dence that intrinsic task psychometric characteristics (cioè., lexical frequency) do not interact
much with the age-FC relationship. Together, the findings confirm the mutual interest of
task-induced FC over a resting-state paradigm to study brain organization in healthy aging.

A Common Naming Activation Network

By choosing a sample- and task-specific template, this study proposed a neurofunctional ex-
ploration as similar as possible to the actual cognitive activity (Dickie et al., 2017; Geerligs
et al., 2017; Salehi et al., 2018; Salehi, Karbasi, Scheinost, & Constable, 2017). As anticipated,
the brain activation analysis yielded a large fronto-temporo-occipital network of higher activity
during naming. This statistical parametric map is in line with the most prominent model of
word processing (Hickok & Poeppel, 2007). Typical ventral semantic and dorsal phonological
streams were revealed by brain activation studies (Baciu et al., 2016; Price, 2012) and brain
stimulation mapping (Duffau et al., 2014) in younger adults, and these findings were replicated
in studies of FC in aging (Hoyau et al., 2018; Indefrey, 2011). Inoltre, the activation peaks
were spatially and functionally coherent with the canonical functional networks that could be
expected to be active during a naming task, such as the visual, sensorimotor, salience, E
anterior and posterior language networks.

The task-related network involved the same regions across age groups, except for the right
inferior cerebellum, which was more active in older than in younger adults. It is now recog-
nized that the cerebellum is engaged in the processing of complex cognitive material (Bernard
& Seidler, 2014; Keren-Happuch, Chen, Ho, & Desmond, 2014; Stoodley, Valera, &
Schmahmann, 2012). In particular, the right inferior cerebellum lobule VIII has been described
as the “sensorimotor cerebellum” because it is involved in overt motor processing (articula-
zione) and phonological storage (Chen & Desmond, 2005). This may suggest increased phono-
logical activity in older adults.

Some studies of word production previously reported increases in BOLD signals in parietal,
frontal, or temporal regions with age (per esempio., Hoyau et al., 2017; Meunier et al., 2014), as well as
contralateral recruitment (per esempio., La et al., 2016; Meinzer et al., 2012), to support performance. UN
recent meta-analysis focusing on semantic cognition and aging (Hoffman & Morcom, 2018)
concluded that increased activation was principally observed when older adults performed
worse than younger ones, Per esempio, during tasks drawing on executive functions. Although
examples of difficulties during naming are common in the literature (Feyereisen, 1997; Goulet
et al., 1994; Shafto et al., 2017), mean accuracy is generally preserved in our study, in line with
previous reports that examined accuracy with untimed tasks (LaBarge et al., 1986; Salthouse,
2014; Schmitter-Edgecombe et al., 2000; Verhaegen & Poncelet, 2013; Wierenga et al., 2008).
In the context of preserved cognitive performance, Poi, the absence of such “compensatory” ac-
tivity is not surprising. It should be mentioned that word production is not systematically preserved
with age (Burke & Shafto, 2004) E, although the causes are still under study (Facal, Juncos-
Rabadán, Rodríguez, & Pereiro, 2012; Schwartz & Frazier, 2005; Shafto, Burke, Stamatakis,
Tam, & Tyler, 2007), the impact of task demand will require further investigation.

Neurobiology of Language

174

l

D
o
w
N
o
UN
D
e
D

F
R
o
M
H

T
T

P

:
/
/

D
io
R
e
C
T
.

M

io
T
.

e
D
tu
N
o

/

l
/

l

UN
R
T
io
C
e
–
P
D

F
/

/

/

/

1
2
1
6
1
1
8
6
7
6
9
1
N
o
_
UN
_
0
0
0
0
7
P
D

/

.

l

F

B
sì
G
tu
e
S
T

T

o
N
0
7
S
e
P
e
M
B
e
R
2
0
2
3

Naming functional connectivity in aging

Age-Related Functional Connectivity Differences

The main question raised in this study was whether there were differences in the FC architec-
ture during word production between younger and older healthy adults. Overall, a common
FC architecture is observed across age groups during the task. Small yet significant, and po-
tentially functionally meaningful, differences were observed: Both increases and decreases
were seen in task-activated regions as well as in the DMN.

Primo, there is a general tendency for older adults to reduce long-range and increase short-
range connectivity. This pattern may play a functional role and reflect the need for more local
processing of neuronal information with age, at the expense of long-distance connectivity (Vedere
Sala-Llonch et al., 2015, for a review), in line with the idea that functional organization be-
comes more segregated with age (Cao et al., 2014; Ferreira & Busatto, 2013; Tomasi &
Volkow, 2012). Alternatively, this pattern may be an unfortunate consequence of head move-
ment (Energia, Schlaggar, & Petersen, 2015; Van Dijk, Sabuncu, & Buckner, 2012). Although
overt naming is deemed to be similar to natural/clinical conditions, it does induce consider-
able task-related motion. Even though many precautionary and corrective measures were taken
during the acquisition and preprocessing steps, some task-related movement remains. No stan-
dard procedure has yet been shown to unequivocally eliminate the confounding factor of
movement (Buckner, Krienen, & Sì, 2013); Tuttavia, scrubbing—as used in this study—is
an efficient method of reducing related artifacts (Energia, Barnes, Snyder, Schlaggar, &
Petersen, 2012; Yan et al., 2013). Further investigation in various task contexts and a better
comprehension of the many structural, molecular, or physiological changes that occur in
healthy aging will be required to determine which interpretation is most valid.

Functional Connectivity Differences in Task-Activated Regions

Earlier studies of FC in aging generally reported expansion of the system involved in word
processing at a younger age (Agarwal et al., 2016; Hoyau et al., 2018; La et al., 2016;
Marsolais et al., 2014). Our results suggest that older adults use similar circuits but also rely
on multiple different mechanisms during task performance.

Primo, the connectivity of the task-activated regions decreases along a fronto-temporo-
occipital pathway (IFG and posterior STG, posterior occipital, and superior frontal gyrus), rem-
iniscent of the semantic ventral stream traditionally described in younger adults (Duffau, 2015;
Hickok & Poeppel, 2007). Although frontotemporal connections have long been considered
crucial for word production, findings emerging from brain surgery, stimulation, and multi-
modal imagery in young adults suggest that their role is multimodal rather than specific
(Binder, Desai, Graves, & Conant, 2009; Chao, Haxby, & Martin, 1999; Duffau, 2015; Etard
et al., 2000; Simons, Koutstaal, Prince, Wagner, & Schacter, 2003; Tyler, Cheung, Devereux,
& Clarke, 2013). Inferior-frontal to posterior-temporal connections—which show less coacti-
vation in older adults—are, Per esempio, involved during tasks that require high semantic con-
trol (Duffau, 2015). This finding is in line with accumulated evidence that older adults rely less
on executive control—and more on semantic retrieval—when performing a word production
task, as demonstrated using univariate activation analysis (Ansado, Marsolais, Methqal, Alary,
& Joanette, 2013; Baciu et al., 2016; Diaz, Rizio, & Zhuang, 2016; Hoyau et al., 2017;
Lacombe, Jolicoeur, Grimault, Pineault, & Joubert, 2015; Marsolais et al., 2014; Methqal,
Marsolais, Wilson, Monchi, & Joanette, 2019) and dynamic FC (Hoyau et al., 2018).
Together, these findings suggest that older adults depend less than younger adults on seman-
tic control abilities to perform the picture-naming task and possibly rely on automatized pro-
cesses instead.

Neurobiology of Language

175

l

D
o
w
N
o
UN
D
e
D

F
R
o
M
H

T
T

P

:
/
/

D
io
R
e
C
T
.

M

io
T
.

e
D
tu
N
o

/

l
/

l

UN
R
T
io
C
e
–
P
D

F
/

/

/

/

1
2
1
6
1
1
8
6
7
6
9
1
N
o
_
UN
_
0
0
0
0
7
P
D

.

/

l

F

B
sì
G
tu
e
S
T

T

o
N
0
7
S
e
P
e
M
B
e
R
2
0
2
3

Naming functional connectivity in aging

A decrease in frontoparietal coupling (right insula, supramarginal gyrus, and parietal
operculum) is in line with earlier assertions that increased FC in domain-general systems
is not required for everyday language functioning (Campbell & Tyler, 2018) and contrasts
with the general expectation that decreased resource allocation is a characteristic of aging
(Park & Reuter-Lorenz, 2009). The insula and the supramarginal gyrus are structurally con-
nected (Ghaziri et al., 2017) and are part of control networks that guide directed attention
(Dosenbach et al., 2007; Menon & Uddin, 2010; Seeley et al., 2007; Zabelina & Andrews-
Hanna, 2016). Their deactivation during speech was previously associated with top-down
regulation of auditory attention, like that induced in a noisy environment (Elmer, Meyer,
Marrama, & Jäncke, 2011), possibly to maximize the somatosensory feedback when speech
production becomes error-prone (Golfinopoulos et al., 2011; Seghier et al., 2015).

Finalmente, another striking and unanticipated age-related feature is the tendency for in-
creased coupling of functional brain activity within and between motor regions responsible
for higher-level phonological processing—for example, significant increases in surrounding
ipsilateral activity in the frontal motor regions in charge of articulation control and initia-
zione, such as the left dorsolateral frontal cortex and middle frontal gyrus (Duffau, 2015;
Guenther, 2016; Wise, Greene, Büchel, & Scott, 1999). The pattern is coherent with pre-
viously described indirect connectivity along the dorsal phonological stream between the
primary motor and the opercula IFG (Broca’s area) via the premotor cortex (Margulies,
Böttger, Watanabe, & Gorgolewski, 2013). The primary motor cortex also shows increased
coupling with the caudate nucleus, which plays a role in the control of articulation
(Argyropoulos, Tremblay, & Small, 2013; Duffau et al., 2014; Guenther, 2016; Margulies
et al., 2013; Tremblay, Deschamps, & Gracco, 2016). In summation, more functional re-
organization and less segregation can be seen along the dorsal phonological stream with
increased age (Agarwal et al., 2016; Diaz et al., 2016; Martins, Simard, & Monchi, 2014;
Muller et al., 2016; Sörös, Bose, Sokoloff, Graham, & Stuss, 2011), in line with the hypoth-
esized weakening of the links between phonological and lexical representations (Burke
et al., 1991).

Functional Connectivity Differences in the DMN

In accordance with previous reports, the DMN showed an age-related increase with other pa-
rietal regions during the task (Chan et al., 2017; Geerligs et al., 2014; Grady et al., 2016; Mak
et al., 2017; Spreng, Stevens, Viviano, & Schacter, 2017). This kind of mechanism has been
suggested to indicate a broad dedifferentiation of neural activity in later life (per esempio., Campbell,
Grady, Di, & Hasher, 2012). Alternatively, the interaction between the DMN and task com-
ponents may indicate active strategic cognitive processes. According to the default-executive
coupling hypothesis of aging (DECHA) modello (Turner & Spreng, 2015), aging is characterized
by a semanticization process: As cognitive control resources decline, cognitive behavior be-
comes more and more influenced by past experiences and knowledge. The DMN therefore
becomes increasingly engaged with task components to support task performance. Although
Turner and Spreng specifically described increases in DMN-prefrontal lateral coupling, Essi
used cognitive tasks that rely partly on executive processes. Infatti, the increase in DMN ac-
tivity has also been demonstrated with other regions (Damoiseaux et al., 2008; Sambataro
et al., 2010) and the DECHA might therefore be extended to any region involved in the task
in relation to the posterior DMN. The posterior DMN has been specifically described as a key
actor in semantic retrieval processes, and in fact, the DMN and the semantic system share an
overlapping functional network (Binder et al., 2009; Bonnelle et al., 2012; Krieger-Redwood
et al., 2016).

Neurobiology of Language

176

l

D
o
w
N
o
UN
D
e
D

F
R
o
M
H

T
T

P

:
/
/

D
io
R
e
C
T
.

M

io
T
.

e
D
tu
N
o

/

l
/

l

UN
R
T
io
C
e
–
P
D

F
/

/

/

/

1
2
1
6
1
1
8
6
7
6
9
1
N
o
_
UN
_
0
0
0
0
7
P
D

.

/

l

F

B
sì
G
tu
e
S
T

T

o
N
0
7
S
e
P
e
M
B
e
R
2
0
2
3

Naming functional connectivity in aging

The Impact of Lexical Frequency Manipulation

Behavioral analysis showed that there is an interaction between age, frequency, and RT, Quale
suggests that lower frequency does make the cognitive activity more demanding for older
adults, even though they still manage to accomplish the task. Lexical frequency did not influ-
ence accuracy scores in either age group. More segregated frequency levels may have allowed
for a stronger task-demand effect (Moberg, Ferraro, & Petros, 2000), and more robust conclu-
sions will require the manipulation of task demands through more than two levels.

Although exploratory, our results show a few regions that are significantly mediated by in-
trinsic task requirement according to age. With greater task demand, integration increases in
older adults, whereas it decreases in young adults. Previous studies with other types of task
load interpreted this pattern as an adaptive form of compensation, beneficial to performance
(per esempio., Crowell et al., 2019; Nagels et al., 2012; Turner & Spreng, 2015). Those studies, E
others that presented age-related compensation patterns (Cabeza, 2002; Campbell et al.,
2012; Grady et al., 2016; Morcom & Henson, 2018; Park & Reuter-Lorenz, 2009; Rajah &
D’Esposito, 2005; Turner & Spreng, 2015), advocated for the notion that there are domain-
general mechanisms, expressed mostly through increased activity in prefrontal regions. Questo
hypothesis builds upon the underlying assumption that older adults find just about any task
more difficult than young adults, because of a general cognitive decline (Craik & Byrd,
1982). Tuttavia, domain-general upregulation was mostly reported using tasks that represent
a strong cognitive challenge for older adults (Hoffman & Morcom, 2018). To our knowledge,
only one other study previously explored the impact of linguistic criteria on verbal fluency
(Marsolais et al., 2014); it showed an interaction between age and increased FC in posterior
regions. Using an intrinsic—linguistic—task demand, rather than general cognitive load, our
findings are also in line with the concept of task-specific mechanisms (Campbell & Schacter,
2016; Campbell & Tyler, 2018; Hearne, Cocchi, Zalesky, & Mattingley, 2017; Peelle, 2019;
Samu et al., 2017). Campbell and Tyler (2018) suggested that domain-general networks should
not be considered as stable, singular mechanisms. Così, neurofunctional patterns invoked
during a task may instead reflect processes that are specific to that task.

In this study, age differences between conditions are small in both size and number.
Inoltre, the FC of the DMN was not significantly affected by lower lexical frequency,
contrary to what had been reported previously in studies that manipulated executive task de-
mands (Persson et al., 2007; Steffener, Habeck, & Stern, 2012). Invece, the interaction was
significant in regions that are functionally meaningful and specialized for the task: the left oc-
cipital cortex and fusiform gyrus, which together encode visual representations of objects
(Mahon et al., 2007; Martin & Chao, 2001); the fusiform gyrus, the cerebellum, and the insula,
which were previously reported to be active during the processing of low-frequency words
(Basso et al., 2013); E, as mentioned earlier, the right inferior cerebellum lobule VIII, Quale
is also related to phonological production (Chen & Desmond, 2005).

Greater insight into domain-general and task-specific mechanisms will be gained by large
data set studies that manipulate various cognitive states, such as those initiated by projects
such as Reference Ability Neural Network study (Stern et al., 2014) and Cambridge Centre
for Ageing and Neuroscience, or CamCAN (Taylor et al., 2015).

Finalmente, some general methodological considerations should be raised regarding the diffi-
culty of interpreting the neurobiological meaning of linear FC changes in group comparisons.
Increased FC could either indicate decreased network adaptability to task demands (Avelar-
Pereira et al., 2017; Campbell & Schacter, 2016; Dixon et al., 2017; Dubois & Adolphs, 2016;
Geerligs et al., 2015; Grady et al., 2016) or reflect optimization for efficient (cioè., piccolo)

Neurobiology of Language

177

l

D
o
w
N
o
UN
D
e
D

F
R
o
M
H

T
T

P

:
/
/

D
io
R
e
C
T
.

M

io
T
.

e
D
tu
N
o

/

l
/

l

UN
R
T
io
C
e
–
P
D

F
/

/

/

/

1
2
1
6
1
1
8
6
7
6
9
1
N
o
_
UN
_
0
0
0
0
7
P
D

.

/

l

F

B
sì
G
tu
e
S
T

T

o
N
0
7
S
e
P
e
M
B
e
R
2
0
2
3

Naming functional connectivity in aging

network updates, reducing processing demands and supporting behavioral performance
(Schultz & Cole, 2016; Shine et al., 2016). Although this study was not designed to rule on
these options, the latter fits the current findings better: Considering the preservation of perfor-
mance, and the tendency for the core naming network to shrink and for the dorsal phonolog-
ical stream to suffer more from the impact of age, FC topography differences could indicate an
efficient strategy relying on a more experienced, automatized, and specialized circuit in older
adults. Alternatively, interindividual heterogeneity should not be underestimated: The intricate
patterns emerging from averaged differences between groups could reflect more diverse brain
physiology and functioning among older people, as has been reported frequently (per esempio., Amiri
et al., 2014; Dong et al., 2012; Raz et al., 2005; Zuo et al., 2010). Inoltre, the task effect
was regressed in this study, because this technique had previously been demonstrated to in-
crease the reliability of task FC estimates (Cao et al., 2014; Cole, Bassett, Energia, Braver, &
Petersen, 2014). This choice may have reduced some of the true task-related effects on
FC but was felt to be preferable considering the overt nature of the naming task and knowing
that participant movement can have large effects on FC estimates (Mowinckel, Espeseth, &
Westlye, 2012).

Conclusione

This study was designed to characterize the possible age-related reorganization of functional
connectivity associated with a word-naming task, while manipulating task demand using the
lexical frequency of the stimuli.

Word production is a basic yet essential cognitive activity central to human everyday function-
ing. This study, like others before it, emphasizes that vocabulary knowledge increases throughout
the life span, into the later stages of life, even though word-production processes slow down.

In this context, the task-induced functional architecture of older adults, compared with
younger adults, is characterized by greater reliance on regions in charge of motor control
areas, along with lesser inclusion of regions classically associated with word production, come
as the IFG and the posterior STG. Earlier descriptions of the core word-production network
were based mostly on samples of young adults and used resting-state paradigms. This study,
using a sample- and task-specific design, suggests that older adults have a more efficient strat-
egy, relying on a more experienced, specialized, and segregated, naming pathway.

This study also reinforces the notion that task-specific rather than domain-general mecha-
nisms apply in older adults. Although additional involvement of frontal and bilateral executive
regions was previously suggested to support the cognitive performance of older adults in every
domain, it appears that those findings cannot be generalized to all cognitive states or types of
task demand. Invece, older adults rely on highly specialized regions to perform more complex
linguistic processes.

Considering the current limitations affecting the interpretation of FC changes with age, fur-
ther exploration is definitely required to disentangle the complex interplay between preserved
performance and neurofunctional behavior, using various tasks and stimuli.

FUNDING INFORMATION

Yves Joanette, Institute of Aging (http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000026), Award ID: 191272.
Simona Maria Brambati, Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining
Tecnologia, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (http://dx.doi.
org/10.13039/501100002790).

Neurobiology of Language

178

l

D
o
w
N
o
UN
D
e
D

F
R
o
M
H

T
T

P

:
/
/

D
io
R
e
C
T
.

M

io
T
.

e
D
tu
N
o

/

l
/

l

UN
R
T
io
C
e
–
P
D

F
/

/

/

/

1
2
1
6
1
1
8
6
7
6
9
1
N
o
_
UN
_
0
0
0
0
7
P
D

/

.

l

F

B
sì
G
tu
e
S
T

T

o
N
0
7
S
e
P
e
M
B
e
R
2
0
2
3

Naming functional connectivity in aging

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Julien Jarret: Data curation: Equal. Simona Maria Brambati: Conceptualization: Supporting;
Methodology: Supporting; Writing — Review & Editing: Supporting. Pierre Bellec:
Methodology: Supporting; Supervision: Supporting; Writing — Review & Editing: Supporting.
Yves Joanette: Conceptualization: Supporting; Funding acquisition: Lead; Project administration:
Equal; Resources: Lead; Supervision: Supporting; Writing — Review & Editing: Supporting.

REFERENCES

Agarwal, S., Stamatakis, E. A., Geva, S., & Warburton, E. UN. (2016).
Dominant hemisphere functional networks compensate for struc-
tural connectivity loss to preserve phonological retrieval with ag-
ing. Brain and Behavior, 6, e00495. https://doi.org/10.1002/
brb3.495

Amiri, M., Pouliot, P., Bonnéry, C., Leclerc, P.-O., Desjardins, M.,
Lesage, F., & Joanette, Y. (2014). An exploration of the effect of
hemodynamic changes due to normal aging on the fNIRS re-
sponse to semantic processing of words. Frontiers in
Neurology, 5, 249. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2014.00249
Andrews-Hanna, J. R., Snyder, UN. Z., Vincent, J. L., Lustig, C., Head,
D., Raichle, M. E., & Buckner, R. l. (2007). Disruption of large-
scale brain systems in advanced aging. Neuron, 56, 924–935.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.038

Ansado, J., Marsolais, Y., Methqal, I., Alary, F., & Joanette, Y. (2013).
The adaptive aging brain: Evidence from the preservation of com-
munication abilities with age. European Journal of Neuroscience,
37, 1887–1895. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.12252

Argyropoulos, G. P., Tremblay, P., & Small, S. l. (2013). The neo-
striatum and response selection in overt sentence production: An
fMRI study. NeuroImage, 82, 53–60.

Ashburner, J. (2007). A fast diffeomorphic image registration algo-

rithm. NeuroImage, 38, 95–113.

Ashburner, J., & Friston, K. J. (2005). Unified segmentation.

NeuroImage, 26, 839–851.

Au, R., Joung, P., Nicholas, M., Obler, l. K., Kass, R., & Albert,
M. l. (1995). Naming ability across the adult life span. Aging,
Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 2, 300–311. https://doi.org/
10.1080/13825589508256605

Avelar-Pereira, B., Bäckman, L., Wåhlin, A., Nyberg, L., & Salami,
UN. (2017). Age-related differences in dynamic interactions among
default mode, frontoparietal control, and dorsal attention networks
during resting-state and interference resolution. Frontiers in Aging
Neuroscience, 9, 152. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2017.00152
Baciu, M., Boudiaf, N., Cousin, E., Perrone-Bertolotti, M., Pichat,
C., Fournet, N., … Krainik, UN. (2016). Functional MRI evidence
for the decline of word retrieval and generation during normal
aging. Age (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 38, 3. https://doi.org/
10.1007/s11357-015-9857-y

Basso, G., Magon, S., Reggiani, F., Capasso, R., Monittola, G.,
Yang, F. J., & Miceli, G. (2013). Distinguishable neurofunctional
effects of task practice and item practice in picture naming: UN
BOLD fMRI study in healthy subjects. Brain and Language,
126(3), 302–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2013.07.002
Behzadi, Y., Restom, K., Liau, J., & Liu, T. T. (2007). A component
based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfu-
sion based fMRI. NeuroImage, 37, 90–101.

Ben-David, B. M., Erel, H., Goy, H., & Schneider, B. UN. (2015).
“Older is always better”: Age-related differences in vocabulary
scores across 16 years. Psychology and Aging, 30, 856–862.
https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000051

Bernard, J. A., & Seidler, R. D. (2014). Moving forward: Age effects
on the cerebellum underlie cognitive and motor declines.
Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 42, 193–207. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.02.011

Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., & Conant, l. l. (2009).
Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis
Di 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex, 19,
2767–2796. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhp055

Blackwell, UN. D., Sahakian, B. J., Vesey, R., Semple, J. M., Robbins,
T. W., & Hodges, J. R. (2004). Detecting dementia: Novel neuro-
psychological markers of preclinical Alzheimer’s disease.
Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 17, 42–48.

Bonnelle, V., Ham, T., Leech, R., Kinnunen, K., Mehta, M.,
Greenwood, R., & Sharp, D. (2012). Salience network integrity
predicts default mode network function after traumatic brain in-
jury. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the
United States of America, 109, 4690–4695. https://doi.org/
10.1073/pnas.1113455109

Buckner, R. L., Krienen, F. M., & Sì, B. T. T. (2013). Opportunities
and limitations of intrinsic functional connectivity MRI. Nature
Neuroscience, 16, 832–837.

Burke, D. M., MacKay, D. G., Worthley, J. S., & Wade, E. (1991). On
the tip of the tongue: What causes word finding failures in young
and older adults? Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 542–579.
Burke, D. M., & Shafto, M. UN. (2004). Aging and language produc-
zione. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 21–24.
Cabeza, R. (2002). Hemispheric asymmetry reduction in older
adults: The HAROLD model. Psychology and Aging, 17, 85–100.
Cabeza, R., Albert, M., Belleville, S., Craik, F. IO. M., Duarte, A.,
Grady, C. L., … Rajah, M. N. (2018). Maintenance, reserve
and compensation: The cognitive neuroscience of healthy age-
ing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 19, 701–710. https://doi.
org/10.1038/s41583-018-0068-2

Cabeza, R., Nyberg, L., & Park, D. C. (2016). Cognitive neurosci-
ence of aging: Linking cognitive and cerebral aging. New York:
Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/
9780195156744.001.0001

Campbell, K. L., Grady, C. L., Di, C., & Hasher, l. (2012). Age differ-
ences in the frontoparietal cognitive control network: Implications
for distractibility. Neuropsychologia, 50, 2212–2223. https://doi.
org/10.1016/J.NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA.2012.05.025

Campbell, K. L., Samu, D., Davis, S. W., Geerligs, L., Mustafa, A.,
Tyler, l. K., & Cambridge Centre for Aging and Neuroscience.
(2016). Robust resilience of the frontotemporal syntax system
to aging. Journal of Neuroscience, 36, 5214–5227. https://doi.
org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4561-15.2016

Campbell, K. L., & Schacter, D. l. (2016). Aging and the resting state:
Is cognition obsolete? Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32,
661–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2017.04.008

Campbell, K. L., & Tyler, l. K. (2018). Language-related domain-
specific and domain-general systems in the human brain.

Neurobiology of Language

179

l

D
o
w
N
o
UN
D
e
D

F
R
o
M
H

T
T

P

:
/
/

D
io
R
e
C
T
.

M

io
T
.

e
D
tu
N
o

/

l
/

l

UN
R
T
io
C
e
–
P
D

F
/

/

/

/

1
2
1
6
1
1
8
6
7
6
9
1
N
o
_
UN
_
0
0
0
0
7
P
D

/

.

l

F

B
sì
G
tu
e
S
T

T

o
N
0
7
S
e
P
e
M
B
e
R
2
0
2
3

Naming functional connectivity in aging

Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 21, 132–137. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.04.008

Cao, M., Wang, J. H., Dai, Z. J., Cao, X. Y., Jiang, l. L., Fan, F. M.,
… He, Y. (2014). Topological organization of the human brain
functional connectome across the lifespan. Developmental
Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 76–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
dcn.2013.11.004

Chan, M. Y., Alhazmi, F. H., Park, D. C., Savalia, N. K., & Wig,
G. S. (2017). Resting-state network topology differentiates task
signals across the adult life span. Journal of Neuroscience, 37,
2734–2745. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2406-16.2017
Chao, l. L., Haxby, J. V., & Martin, UN. (1999). Attribute-based neu-
ral substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing
about objects. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 913–919.

Chen, S. H. A., & Desmond, J. E. (2005). Temporal dynamics of
cerebro-cerebellar network recruitment during a cognitive task.
Neuropsychologia, 43, 1227–1237.

Cole, M. W., Bassett, D. S., Energia, J. D., Braver, T. S., & Petersen,
S. E. (2014). Intrinsic and task-evoked network architectures of
the human brain. Neuron, 83, 238–251. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.neuron.2014.05.014

Cole, D. M., Smith, S. M., & Beckmann, C. F. (2010). Advances and
pitfalls in the analysis and interpretation of resting-state FMRI
dati. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 4, 8. https://doi.org/
10.3389/fnsys.2010.00008

Condret-Santi, V., Barbeau, E. J., Matharan, F., Le Goff, M.,
Dartigues, J.-F., & Amieva, H. (2013). Prevalence of word re-
trieval complaint and prediction of dementia in a population-
based study of elderly subjects. Dementia and Geriatric
Cognitive Disorders, 35(5–6), 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1159/
000342594

Craik, F. IO. M., & Byrd, M. (1982). Aging and cognitive deficits. In
F. IO. M. Craik & S. Trehub (Eds.), Aging and cognitive processes
(pag. 191–211). Boston, MA: Springer US. https://doi.org/10.
1007/978-1-4684-4178-9_11

Crowell, C. A., Davis, S. W., Beynel, L., Deng, L., Lakhlani, D.,
Hilbig, S. A., … Cabeza, R. (2019). Older adults benefit from
more widespread brain network integration during working
memory. BioRxiv, 642447. https://doi.org/10.1101/642447

Damoiseaux, J. S., Beckmann, C. F., Arigita, E. J. S., Barkhof, F.,
Scheltens, P., Stam, C. J., … Rombouts, S. UN. R. B. (2008).
Reduced resting-state brain activity in the “default network” in
normal aging. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 1856–1864. https://doi.org/
10.1093/cercor/bhm207

Davis, S. W., Dennis, N. A., Daselaar, S. M., Fleck, M. S., &
Cabeza, R. (2008). Qué pasa? The posterior-anterior shift in ag-
ing. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 1201–1209.

Davis, S. W., Stanley, M. L., Moscovitch, M., & Cabeza, R. (2017).
Resting-state networks do not determine cognitive function net-
works: A commentary on Campbell and Schacter (2016).
Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32, 669–673.

Diaz, M. T., Rizio, UN. A., & Zhuang, J. (2016). The neural language
systems that support healthy aging: Integrating function, struc-
ture, and behavior. Language and Linguistics Compass, 10,
314–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12199

Dickie, D. A., Shenkin, S. D., Anblagan, D., Lee, J., Blesa Cabez, M.,
Rodriguez, D., … Wardlaw, J. M. (2017). Whole brain magnetic res-
onance image atlases: A systematic review of existing atlases and
caveats for use in population imaging. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics,
11, 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2017.00001

Dixon, M. L., Andrews-Hanna, J. R., Spreng, R. N., Irving, Z. C.,
Mills, C., Girn, M., & Christoff, K. (2017). Interactions between
the default network and dorsal attention network vary across

default subsystems, time, and cognitive states. NeuroImage, 147,
632–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2016.12.073
Dong, L., Shen, Y., Lei, X., Luo, C., Li, Q.-W., Wu, W.-Y., … Li,
C.-B. (2012). The heterogeneity of aging brain: Altered functional
connectivity in default mode network in older adults during ver-
bal fluency tests. Chinese Medical Journal, 125, 604–610. https://
doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.2012.04.009

Dosenbach, N. U. F., Fair, D. A., Miezin, F. M., Cohen, UN. L.,
Wenger, K. K., Dosenbach, R. UN. T., … Raichle, M. E. (2007).
Distinct brain networks for adaptive and stable task control in hu-
mans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104,
11073–11078.

Dubois, J., & Adolphs, R. (2016). Building a science of individual
differences from fMRI. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 425–443.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.03.014

Duffau, H. (2015). Stimulation mapping of white matter tracts to
study brain functional connectivity. Nature Reviews Neurology,
11, 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2015.51

Duffau, H., Moritz-Gasser, S., & Mandonnet, E. (2014). A re-
examination of neural basis of language processing: Proposal of
a dynamic hodotopical model from data provided by brain stim-
ulation mapping during picture naming. Brain and Language,
131, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2013.05.011

Eickhoff, S. B., Stephan, K. E., Mohlberg, H., Grefkes, C., Fink, G. R.,
Amunts, K., & Zilles, K. (2005). A new SPM toolbox for combining
probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data.
NeuroImage, 25, 1325–1335.

Elmer, S., Meyer, M., Marrama, L., & Jäncke, l. (2011). Intensive
language training and attention modulate the involvement of
fronto-parietal regions during a non-verbal auditory discrimina-
tion task. European Journal of Neuroscience, 34, 165–175.
Etard, O., Mellet, E., Papathanassiou, D., Benali, K., Houdé, O.,
Mazoyer, B., & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2000). Picture naming
without Broca’s and Wernicke’s area. NeuroReport, 11, 617–622.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200002280-00036

Facal, D., Juncos-Rabadán, O., Rodríguez, M. S., & Pereiro, UN. X.
(2012). Tip-of-the-tongue in aging: Influence of vocabulary,
working memory and processing speed. Aging Clinical and
Experimental Research, 24, 647–656.

Ferré, P., Benhajali, Y., Steffener, J., Stern, Y., Joanette, Y., & Bellec,
P. (2019). Resting-state and vocabulary tasks distinctively inform
on age-related differences in the functional brain connectome.
Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34, 949–972. https://
doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1608072

Ferreira, l. K., & Busatto, G. F. (2013). Resting-state functional
connectivity in normal brain aging. Neuroscience and
Biobehavioral Reviews, 37, 384–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.neubiorev.2013.01.017

Ferreira, l. K., Regina, UN. C. B., Kovacevic, N., Martin, M. da G. M.,
Santos, P. P., Carneiro, C. de G., … Busatto, G. F. (2016). Aging
effects on whole-brain functional connectivity in adults free of
cognitive and psychiatric disorders. Cerebral Cortex, 26, 3851–3865.
https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhv190

Feyereisen, P. (1997). A meta-analytic procedure shows an age-
related decline in picture naming: Comments on Goulet, Ska, E
Kahn (1994). Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research,
40, 1328–1333. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4006.1328

Feyereisen, P., Demaeght, N., & Samson, D. (1998). Why do picture
naming latencies increase with age: General slowing, greater sensi-
tivity to interference, or task-specific deficits? Experimental Aging
Research, 24(1), 21–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/036107398244346
Finn, E. S., Scheinost, D., Finn, D. M., Shen, X., Papademetris,
X., & Constable, R. T. (2017). Can brain state be manipulated

Neurobiology of Language

180

l

D
o
w
N
o
UN
D
e
D

F
R
o
M
H

T
T

P

:
/
/

D
io
R
e
C
T
.

M

io
T
.

e
D
tu
N
o

/

l
/

l

UN
R
T
io
C
e
–
P
D

F
/

/

/

/

1
2
1
6
1
1
8
6
7
6
9
1
N
o
_
UN
_
0
0
0
0
7
P
D

/

.

l

F

B
sì
G
tu
e
S
T

T

o
N
0
7
S
e
P
e
M
B
e
R
2
0
2
3

Naming functional connectivity in aging

to emphasize individual differences in functional connectivity?
NeuroImage, 160, 140–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.
2017.03.064

Fjell, UN. M., & Walhovd, K. B. (2016). Multi-modal imaging of the
aging brain. In R. Cabeza, l. Nyberg, & D. C. Park (Eds.),
Cognitive neuroscience of aging: Linking cognitive and cerebral
aging ( Vol. 2, pag. 359–379). New York: Oxford University Press.
Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display
program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research
Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35, 116–124.

Friederici, UN. D., & Gierhan, S. M. E. (2013). The language network.
Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 23, 250–254. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.conb.2012.10.002

Geerligs, L., & Henson, R. N. (2016). Functional connectivity and
structural covariance between regions of interest can be mea-
sured more accurately using multivariate distance correlation.
NeuroImage, 135, 16–31.

Geerligs, L., Maurits, N. M., Renken, R. J., & Lorist, M. M. (2014).
Reduced specificity of functional connectivity in the aging brain
during task performance. Human Brain Mapping, 35, 319–330.
https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22175

Geerligs, L., Rubinov, M., & Henson, R. N. (2015). State and trait com-
ponents of functional connectivity: Individual differences vary with
mental state. Journal of Neuroscience, 35, 13949–13961.

Geerligs, L., Tsvetanov, K. A., & Henson, R. N. (2017). Challenges
in measuring individual differences in functional connectivity
using fMRI: The case of healthy aging. Human Brain Mapping,
38, 4125–4156. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23653

Ghaziri, J., Tucholka, A., Girard, G., Houde, J.-C., Boucher, O.,
Gilbert, G., … Nguyen, D. K. (2017). The corticocortical struc-
tural connectivity of the human insula. Cerebral Cortex, 27,
1216–1228. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhv308

Golfinopoulos, E., Tourville, J. A., Bohland, J. W., Ghosh, S. S.,
Nieto-Castanon, A., & Guenther, F. H. (2011). fMRI investigation
of unexpected somatosensory feedback perturbation during
speech. NeuroImage, 55, 1324–1338. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.
NEUROIMAGE.2010.12.065

Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E., & Weintraub, S. (1983). Boston naming

test. Philadelphia, PAPÀ: Lea & Febiger.

Goulet, P., Ska, B., & Kahn, H. J. (1994). Is there a decline in picture
naming with advancing age? Journal of Speech and Hearing
Research, 37, 629–644. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3703.629
Grady, C., Sarraf, S., Saverino, C., & Campbell, K. (2016). Age differ-
ences in the functional interactions among the default, frontoparietal
controllo, and dorsal attention networks. Neurobiology of Aging, 41,
159–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.02.020
Greene, UN. S., Gao, S., Scheinost, D., & Constable, R. T. (2018).
Task-induced brain state manipulation improves prediction of in-
dividual traits. Nature Communications, 9, 2807. https://doi.org/
10.1038/s41467-018-04920-3

Guenther, F. H. (2016). Neural models of motor speech control.
In G. Hickok & S. l. Small (Eds.), Neurobiology of language
(pag. 725–740). London: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.
1016/ B978-0-12-407794-2.00058-4

Hearne, l. J., Cocchi, L., Zalesky, A., & Mattingley, J. B. (2017).
Reconfiguration of brain network architectures between resting-
state and complexity-dependent cognitive reasoning. Journal of
Neuroscience, 37, 8399–8411. https://doi.org/10.1523/
JNEUROSCI.0485-17.2017

Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2007). The cortical organization of

speech processing. Nature, 8, 393–402.

Hoffman, P., & Morcom, UN. M. (2018). Age-related changes in the
neural networks supporting semantic cognition: A meta-analysis

Di 47 functional neuroimaging studies. Neuroscience and
Biobehavioral Reviews, 84, 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.
NEUBIOREV.2017.11.010

Hoyau, E., Boudiaf, N., Cousin, E., Pichat, C., Fournet, N., Krainik,
A., … Baciu, M. (2017). Aging modulates the hemispheric special-
ization during word production. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience,
9, 125. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2017.00125

Hoyau, E., Roux-Sibilon, A., Boudiaf, N., Pichat, C., Cousin, E.,
Krainik, A., … Baciu, M. (2018). Aging modulates fronto-temporal
cortical interactions during lexical production. A dynamic causal
modeling study. Brain and Language, 184, 11–19. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.bandl.2018.06.003

Indefrey, P. (2011). The spatial and temporal signatures of word
production components: A critical update. Frontiers in
Psychology, 2, 255.

Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2004). The spatial and temporal
signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92,
101–144.

Jackson, R. L., Hoffman, P., Pobric, G., & Lambon Ralph, M. UN.
(2015). The nature and neural correlates of semantic association
versus conceptual similarity. Cerebral Cortex, 25, 4319–4333.
https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhv003

Keren-Happuch, E., Chen, S.-H. A., Ho, M.-H. R., & Desmond, J. E.
(2014). A meta-analysis of cerebellar contributions to higher cog-
nition from PET and fMRI studies. Human Brain Mapping, 35,
593–615.

Kong, R., Li, J., Orban, C., Sabuncu, M. R., Liu, H., Schaefer, A., …
Sì, B. T. T. (2018). Spatial topography of individual-specific
cortical networks predicts human cognition, personality, E
emotion. Cerebral Cortex, 29, 2533–2551. https://doi.org/10.1093/
cercor/bhy123

Krieger-Redwood, K., Jefferies, E., Karapanagiotidis, T., Seymour,
R., Nunes, A., Ang, J. W. A., … Smallwood, J. (2016). Down
but not out in posterior cingulate cortex: Deactivation yet func-
tional coupling with prefrontal cortex during demanding seman-
tic cognition. NeuroImage, 141, 366–377. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.07.060

IL, C., Garcia-Ramos, C., Nair, V. A., Meier, T. B., Farrar-Edwards,
D., Birn, R., … Prabhakaran, V. (2016). Age-related changes in
BOLD activation pattern in phonemic fluency paradigm: An in-
vestigation of activation, functional connectivity and psycho-
physiological interactions. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 8,
110. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2016.00110

LaBarge, E., Edwards, D., & Knesevich, J. W. (1986). Performance
of normal elderly on the Boston Naming Test. Brain and
Language, 27, 380–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(86)
90026-X

Lacombe, J., Jolicoeur, P., Grimault, S., Pineault, J., & Joubert, S.
(2015). Neural changes associated with semantic processing in
healthy aging despite intact behavioral performance. Brain and
Language, 149, 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.
2015.07.003

LaGrone, S., & Spieler, D. H. (2006). Lexical competition and pho-
nological encoding in young and older speakers. Psychology and
Aging, 21, 804–809. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.
21.4.804

Liljeström, M., Stevenson, C., Kujala, J., & Salmelin, R. (2015).
Task- and stimulus-related cortical networks in language produc-
zione: Exploring similarity of MEG- and fMRI-derived functional
connectivity. NeuroImage, 120, 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.neuroimage.2015.07.017

Mahon, B. Z., Milleville, S. C., Negri, G. UN. L., Rumiati, R. I.,
Caramazza, A., & Martin, UN. (2007). Action-related properties

Neurobiology of Language

181

l

D
o
w
N
o
UN
D
e
D

F
R
o
M
H

T
T

P

:
/
/

D
io
R
e
C
T
.

M

io
T
.

e
D
tu
N
o

/

l
/

l

UN
R
T
io
C
e
–
P
D

F
/

/

/

/

1
2
1
6
1
1
8
6
7
6
9
1
N
o
_
UN
_
0
0
0
0
7
P
D

/

.

l

F

B
sì
G
tu
e
S
T

T

o
N
0
7
S
e
P
e
M
B
e
R
2
0
2
3

Naming functional connectivity in aging

shape object representations in the ventral stream. Neuron, 55,
507–520.

Mak, l. E., Minuzzi, L., MacQueen, G., Hall, G., Kennedy, S. H., &
Milev, R. (2017). The default mode network in healthy individ-
uals: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Connectivity,
7, 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1089/brain.2016.0438

Margulies, D. S., Böttger, J., Watanabe, A., & Gorgolewski, K. J.
(2013). Visualizing the human connectome. NeuroImage, 80,
445–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.111
Marsolais, Y., Perlbarg, V., Benali, H., & Joanette, Y. (2014). Age-
related changes in functional network connectivity associated
with high levels of verbal fluency performance. Cortex, 58,
123–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2014.05.007

Martin, A., & Chao, l. l. (2001). Semantic memory and the brain:
Structure and processes. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11,
194–201.

Martins, R., Simard, F., & Monchi, O. (2014). Differences between
patterns of brain activity associated with semantics and those
linked with phonological processing diminish with age. PLOS
One, 9, e99710. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099710
Mazaika, P. K., Hoeft, F., Glover, G. H., & Reiss, UN. l. (2009).
Methods and software for fMRI analysis of clinical subjects.
NeuroImage, 47, S58.

Mazaika, P. K., Whitfield, S., & Cooper, J. C. (2005). Detection and
repair of transient artifacts in fMRI data. NeuroImage, 26, S36.
Meinzer, M., Flaisch, T., Seeds, L., Harnish, S., Antonenko, D.,
Witte, V., … Crosson, B. (2012). Same modulation but different
starting points: Performance modulates age differences in inferior
frontal cortex activity during word-retrieval. PLOS One, 7,
e33631. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033631

Menon, V., & Uddin, l. Q. (2010). Saliency, switching, attention and
controllo: A network model of insula function. Brain Structure and
Function, 214, 655–667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-010-0262-0
Methqal, I., Marsolais, Y., Wilson, M. A., Monchi, O., & Joanette,
Y. (2019). More expertise for a better perspective: Task and strategy-
driven adaptive neurofunctional reorganization for word pro-
duction in high-performing older adults. Aging, Neuropsychology,
and Cognition, 26, 190–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.
2017.1423021

Meunier, D., Stamatakis, E. A., & Tyler, l. K. (2014). Age-related
functional reorganization, structural changes, and preserved cog-
nition. Neurobiology of Aging, 35, 42–54. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.07.003

Mugnaio, K. J., Rogers, S. A., Siddarth, P., & Small, G. W. (2005).
Object naming and semantic fluency among individuals with
genetic risk for Alzheimer’s disease. International Journal of
Geriatric Psychiatry, 20, 128–136.

Moberg, M., Ferraro, F. R., & Petros, T. V. (2000). Lexical properties
of the Boston Naming Test stimuli: Age differences in word naming
and lexical decision latency. Applied Neuropsychology, 7,
186–188. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324826AN0703_5

Morcom, UN. M., & Henson, R. N. UN. (2018). Increased prefrontal
activity with aging reflects nonspecific neural responses rather
than compensation. Journal of Neuroscience, 38, 7303–7313.
https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1701-17.2018

Moritz-Gasser, S., Herbet, G., & Duffau, H. (2013). Mapping the
connectivity underlying multimodal (verbal and non-verbal)
semantic processing: A brain electrostimulation study.
Neuropsychologia, 51, 1814–1822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
neuropsychologia.2013.06.007

Mowinckel, UN. M., Espeseth, T., & Westlye, l. T. (2012). Network-
specific effects of age and in-scanner subject motion: A resting-
state fMRI study of 238 healthy adults. NeuroImage, 63, 1364–1373.

Muller, UN. M., Mérillat, S., & Jäncke, l. (2016). Older but still flu-
ent? Insights from the intrinsically active baseline configuration
of the aging brain using a data driven graph-theoretical ap-
proach. NeuroImage, 127, 346–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
neuroimage.2015.12.027

Muschelli, J., Nebel, M. B., Caffo, B. S., Barber, UN. D., Pekar, J. J., &
Mostofsky, S. H. (2014). Reduction of motion-related artifacts in
resting state fMRI using aCompCor. NeuroImage, 96, 22–35.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2014.03.028

Nagels, A., Kircher, T., Dietsche, B., Backes, H., Marquetand, J., &
Krug, UN. (2012). Neural processing of overt word generation in
healthy individuals: The effect of age and word knowledge. Neuro-
Image, 61, 832–840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.
2012.04.019

Nasreddine, Z. S., Philips, N. A., Bedirian, V., Charbonneau, S.,
Whitehead, V., Collin, I., … Chertkow, H. (2005). Montreal
Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Journal of the American
Geriatrics Society, 53, 695–699.

Park, D. C., & Reuter-Lorenz, P. (2009). The adaptive brain: Aging
and neurocognitive scaffolding. Annual Review of Psychology,
60, 173–196. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.
103006.093656

Peelle, J. E. (2019). Language and aging. In N. O. Schiller & G. IO. Di
Zubicaray (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of neurolinguistics.
Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/
9780190672027.013.12

Perry, A., Wen, W., Lord, A., Thalamuthu, A., Roberts, G.,
Mitchell, P., … Breakspear, M. (2015). The organisation of the
elderly connectome. NeuroImage, 114, 414–426. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.009

Persson, J., Lustig, C., Nelson, J. K., & Reuter-Lorenz, P. UN. (2007).
Age differences in deactivation: A link to cognitive control?
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1021–1032. https://doi.
org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.6.1021

Persson, J., Pudas, S., Nilsson, L.-G., & Nyberg, l. (2014).
Longitudinal assessment of default-mode brain function in aging.
Neurobiology of Aging, 35, 2107–2117. https://doi.org/10.1016/
J.NEUROBIOLAGING.2014.03.012

Energia, J. D., Barnes, K. A., Snyder, UN. Z., Schlaggar, B. L., &
Petersen, S. E. (2012). Spurious but systematic correlations in
functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion.
NeuroImage, 59, 2142–2154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
neuroimage.2011.10.018

Energia, J. D., Schlaggar, B. L., & Petersen, S. E. (2015). Recent prog-
ress and outstanding issues in motion correction in resting state
fMRI. NeuroImage, 105, 536–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
neuroimage.2014.10.044

Price, C. J. (2012). A review and synthesis of the first 20 years of
PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and
reading. NeuroImage, 62, 816–847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
neuroimage.2012.04.062

Rajah, M. N., & D’Esposito, M. (2005). Region-specific changes in
prefrontal function with age: A review of PET and fMRI studies on
working and episodic memory. Brain, 128, 1964–1983.

Raz, N., Lindenberger, U., Rodrigue, K. M., Kennedy, K. M., Head,
D., Williamson, A., … Acker, J. D. (2005). Regional brain changes
in aging healthy adults: General trends, individual differences and
modifiers. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 1676–1689. https://doi.org/
10.1093/cercor/bhi044

Reilly, J., Peelle, J. E., Antonucci, S. M., & Grossman, M. (2011).
Anomia as a marker of distinct semantic memory impairments
in Alzheimer’s disease and semantic dementia. Neuropsychology,
25, 413.

Neurobiology of Language

182

l

D
o
w
N
o
UN
D
e
D

F
R
o
M
H

T
T

P

:
/
/

D
io
R
e
C
T
.

M

io
T
.

e
D
tu
N
o

/

l
/

l

UN
R
T
io
C
e
–
P
D

F
/

/

/

/

1
2
1
6
1
1
8
6
7
6
9
1
N
o
_
UN
_
0
0
0
0
7
P
D

.

/

l

F

B
sì
G
tu
e
S
T

T

o
N
0
7
S
e
P
e
M
B
e
R
2
0
2
3

Naming functional connectivity in aging

Roberts, P. M., & Doucet, N. (2011). Résultats du Boston Naming Test
chez des adultes francophones de Québec. Canadian Journal of
Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 35, 254–267.

Rogalski, Y., Peelle, J. E., & Reilly, J. (2011). Effects of perceptual and
contextual enrichment on visual confrontation naming in adult
aging. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54,
1349–1360. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0178)

Sal a-Llonch, R., Bartrés-Fa z, D. , & Ju nq ué , C .

( 20 15 ).
Reorganization of brain networks in aging: A review of functional
connectivity studies. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 663. https://doi.
org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00663

Salehi, M., Greene, UN. S., Karbasi, A., Shen, X., Scheinost, D., &
Constable, R. T. (2018). There is no single functional atlas even
for a single individual: Parcellation of the human brain is state
dependent. BioRxiv, 431833.

Salehi, M., Karbasi, A., Scheinost, D., & Constable, R. T. (2017). UN
submodular approach to create individualized parcellations of
the human brain. In M. Descoteaux, l. Maier-Hein, UN. Franz,
P. Jannin, D. Collins, & S. Duchesne (Eds.), Medical image com-
puting and computer assisted intervention – MICCAI 2017
(pag. 478–485). Cham, Svizzera: Springer.

Salthouse, T. UN. (2014). Quantity and structure of word knowledge
across adulthood. Intelligenza, 46, 122–130. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.009

Sambataro, F., Murty, V. P., Callicott, J. H., Tan, H.-Y., Das, S.,
Weinberger, D. R., & Mattay, V. S. (2010). Age-related alter-
ations in default mode network: Impact on working memory per-
formance. Neurobiology of Aging, 31, 839–852. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.05.022

Samu, D., Campbell, K. L., Tsvetanov, K. A., Shafto, M. A., Cam-CAN,
& Tyler, l. K. (2017). Preserved cognitive functions with age are
determined by domain-dependent shifts in network responsivity.
Nature Communications, 8, 14743. https://doi.org/10.1038/
ncomms14743

Sarubbo, S., De Benedictis, A., Merler, S., Mandonnet, E.,
Barbareschi, M., Dallabona, M., … Duffau, H. (2016).
Structural and functional integration between dorsal and ventral
language streams as revealed by blunt dissection and direct elec-
trical stimulation. Human Brain Mapping, 37, 3858–3872.
https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23281

Satterthwaite, T. D., Elliott, M. A., Gerraty, R. T., Ruparel, K.,
Loughead, J., Calkins, M. E., … Wolf, D. H. (2013). An improved
framework for confound regression and filtering for control of
motion artifact in the preprocessing of resting-state functional
connectivity data. NeuroImage, 64, 240–256. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.08.052

Schmitter-Edgecombe, M., Vesneski, M., & Jones, D. W. R. (2000).
Aging and word-finding: A comparison of spontaneous and con-
strained naming tests. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15,
479–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-6177(99)00039-6

Schneider-Garces, N. J., Gordon, B. A., Brumback-Peltz, C. R.,
Shin, E., Lee, Y., Sutton, B. P., … Fabiani, M. (2010). Span,
CRUNCH, and beyond: Working memory capacity and the ag-
ing brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 655–669.
https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21230

Schultz, D. H., & Cole, M. W. (2016). Higher intelligence is associ-
ated with less task-related brain network reconfiguration. Journal
of Neuroscience, 36, 8551–8561. https://doi.org/10.1523/
JNEUROSCI.0358-16.2016

Schwartz, B. L., & Frazier, l. D. (2005). Tip-of-the-tongue states and
aging: Contrasting psycholinguistic and metacognitive perspec-
tives. Journal of General Psychology, 132, 377–391. https://doi.
org/10.3200/GENP.132.4.377-391

Seeley, W. W., Menon, V., Schatzberg, UN. F., Keller, J., Glover, G. H.,
Kenna, H., … Greicius, M. D. (2007). Dissociable intrinsic con-
nectivity networks for salience processing and executive control.
Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 2349–2356.

Seghier, M. L., Hope, T. M. H., Prejawa, S., Parker Jones, O.,
Vitkovitch, M., & Price, C. J. (2015). A trade-off between somato-
sensory and auditory related brain activity during object naming
but not reading. Journal of Neuroscience, 35, 4751–4759. https://
doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2292-14.2015

Shafto, M. A., Burke, D. M., Stamatakis, E. A., Tam, P. P., & Tyler,
l. K. (2007). On the tip-of-the-tongue: Neural correlates of in-
creased word-finding failures in normal aging. Journal of
Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 2060–2070. https://doi.org/
10.1162/jocn.2007.19.12.2060

Shafto, M. A., James, l. E., Abrams, L., & Tyler, l. K. (2017). Age-
related increases in verbal knowledge are not associated with
word finding problems in the Cam-CAN cohort: What you know
won’t hurt you. The Journals of Gerontology Series B, 72, 100–106.
https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbw074

Shafto, M. A., & Tyler, l. K. (2014). Language in the aging brain:
The network dynamics of cognitive decline and preservation.
Scienza, 346(6209), 583–588.

Shine, J. M., Bissett, P. G., Campana, P. T., Koyejo, O., Balsters, J. H.,
Gorgolewski, K. J., … Poldrack, R. UN. (2016). The dynamics of
functional brain networks: Integrated network states during cog-
nitive task performance. Neuron, 92, 544–554. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.neuron.2016.09.018

Simons, J. S., Koutstaal, W., Prince, S., Wagner, UN. D., & Schacter,
D. l. (2003). Neural mechanisms of visual object priming:
Evidence for perceptual and semantic distinctions in fusiform
cortex. NeuroImage, 19, 613–626.

Song, J., Desphande, UN. S., Meier, T. B., Tudorascu, D. L., Vergun,
S., Nair, V. A., … Bellec, P. (2012). Age-related differences in
test-retest reliability in resting-state brain functional connectivity.
PLOS One, 7, e49847.

Sörös, P., Bose, A., Sokoloff, l. G., Graham, S. J., & Stuss, D. T. (2011).
Age-related changes in the functional neuroanatomy of overt
speech production. Neurobiology of Aging, 32, 1505–1513.
https://doi.org/10.1016/ J.NEUROBIOLAGING.2009.08.015
Spreng, R. N., Stevens, W. D., Viviano, J. D., & Schacter, D. l.
(2017). Attenuated anticorrelation between the default and dor-
sal attention networks with aging: Evidence from task and rest.
Neurobiology of Aging, 45, 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
neurobiolaging.2016.05.020

Steffener, J., Barulli, D., Habeck, C., O’Shea, D., Razlighi, Q.,
Stern, Y., … Bosch, B. (2014). The role of education and verbal
abilities in altering the effect of age-related gray matter differ-
ences on cognition. PLOS One, 9, e91196. https://doi.org/10.
1371/journal.pone.0091196

Steffener, J., Habeck, C. G., & Stern, Y. (2012). Age-related changes
in task related functional network connectivity. PLOS One, 7,
e44421. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044421

Stern, Y., Habeck, C., Steffener, J., Barulli, D., Gazes, Y., Razlighi,
Q., … Salthouse, T. (2014). The Reference Ability Neural
Network Study: Motivation, progetto, and initial feasibility analy-
ses. NeuroImage, 103, 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
neuroimage.2014.09.029

Stoodley, C. J., Valera, E. M., & Schmahmann, J. D. (2012).
Functional topography of the cerebellum for motor and cognitive
compiti: An fMRI study. NeuroImage, 59, 1560–1570. https://doi.
org/10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2011.08.065

Taylor, J. R., Williams, N., Cusack, R., Auer, T., Shafto, M. A.,
Dixon, M., … Henson, R. N. (2015). The Cambridge Centre for

Neurobiology of Language

183

l

D
o
w
N
o
UN
D
e
D

F
R
o
M
H

T
T

P

:
/
/

D
io
R
e
C
T
.

M

io
T
.

e
D
tu
N
o

/

l
/

l

UN
R
T
io
C
e
–
P
D

F
/

/

/

/

1
2
1
6
1
1
8
6
7
6
9
1
N
o
_
UN
_
0
0
0
0
7
P
D

.

/

l

F

B
sì
G
tu
e
S
T

T

o
N
0
7
S
e
P
e
M
B
e
R
2
0
2
3

Naming functional connectivity in aging

Ageing and Neuroscience (Cam-CAN) data repository: Structural
and functional MRI, MEG, and cognitive data from a cross-
sectional adult lifespan sample. NeuroImage, 144, 262–269.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.09.018

Tomasi, D., & Volkow, N. D. (2010). Functional connectivity den-
sity mapping. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
107, 9885–9890. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1001414107
Tomasi, D., & Volkow, N. D. (2012). Aging and functional brain
networks. Molecular Psychiatry, 17, 549–558. https://doi.org/
10.1038/mp.2011.81

Tran, S. M., McGregor, K. M., James, G. A., Gopinath, K.,
Krishnamurthy, V., Krishnamurthy, l. C., & Crosson, B. (2018).
Task-residual functional connectivity of language and attention
networks. Brain and Cognition, 122, 52–58. https://doi.org/
10.1016/J.BANDC.2018.02.003

Tremblay, P., Deschamps, I., & Gracco, V. l. (2016). Neurobiology
of speech production: A motor control perspective. In G. Hickok &
S. l. Small (Eds.), Neurobiology of language (pag. 741–750).
London: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/ B978-0-12-
407794-2.00059-6

Tsvetanov, K. A., Henson, R. N. A., Tyler, l. K., Razi, A., Geerligs, L.,
Ham, T. E., … Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience.
(2016). Extrinsic and intrinsic brain network connectivity main-
tains cognition across the lifespan despite accelerated decay of re-
gional brain activation. Journal of Neuroscience, 36, 3115–3126.
https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2733-15.2016

Turner, G. R., & Spreng, R. N. (2015). Prefrontal engagement and
reduced default network suppression co-occur and are dynami-
cally coupled in older adults: The default–executive coupling
hypothesis of aging. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27,
2462–2476. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00869

Tyler, l. K., Cheung, T. P. L., Devereux, B. J., & Clarke, UN. (2013).
Syntactic computations in the language network: Characterizing
dynamic network properties using representational similarity
analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 271.

Van Dijk, K. R. A., Sabuncu, M. R., & Buckner, R. l. (2012). IL
influence of head motion on intrinsic functional connectivity
MRI. NeuroImage, 59, 431–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
neuroimage.2011.07.044

Varangis, E., Razlighi, Q., Habeck, C. G., Fisher, Z., & Stern, Y.
(2019). Between-network functional connectivity is modified by
age and cognitive task domain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,
31, 607–622. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01368

Verhaegen, C., & Poncelet, M. (2013). Changes in naming and se-
mantic abilities with aging from 50 A 90 years. Journal of the
International Neuropsychological Society, 19, 119–126. https://
doi.org/10.1017/S1355617712001178

Wang, W.-C., Dew, IO. T. Z., & Cabeza, R. (2015). Age-related dif-
ferences in medial temporal lobe involvement during conceptual
fluency. Brain Research, 1612, 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
brainres.2014.09.061

Whitfield-Gabrieli, S., & Nieto-Castanon, UN. (2012). Conn: A func-
tional connectivity toolbox for correlated and anticorrelated
brain networks. Brain Connectivity, 2, 125–141. https://doi.org/
10.1089/brain.2012.0073

WHO. (2018). What is healthy ageing? Retrieved February 8, 2018,

from http://www.who.int/ageing/healthy-ageing/en/

Wierenga, C. E., Benjamin, M., Gopinath, K., Perlstein, W. M.,
Leonard, C. M., Rothi, l. J. G., … Crosson, B. (2008). Age-related
changes in word retrieval: Role of bilateral frontal and subcorti-
cal networks. Neurobiology of Aging, 29, 436–451. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2006.10.024

Wise, R., Greene, J., Büchel, C., & Scott, S. (1999). Brain regions
involved in articulation. The Lancet, 353(9158), 1057–1061.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(98)07491-1

Yan, C.-G., Cheung, B., Kelly, C., Colcombe, S., Craddock, R. C.,
Di Martino, A., … Milham, M. P. (2013). A comprehensive
assessment of regional variation in the impact of head micro-
movements on functional connectomics. NeuroImage, 76,
183–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.004
Zabelina, D. L., & Andrews-Hanna, J. R. (2016). Dynamic network
interactions supporting internally-oriented cognition. Current
Opinion in Neurobiology, 40, 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.
CONB.2016.06.014

Zalesky, A., Fornito, A., & Bullmore, E. T. (2010). Network-based
statistic: Identifying differences in brain networks. NeuroImage,
53, 1197–1207.

Zhu, D., Zhang, T., Jiang, X., Eh, X., Chen, H., Yang, N., … Liu, T.
(2013). Fusing DTI and fMRI data: A survey of methods and ap-
plications. NeuroImage, 102, 184–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
neuroimage.2013.09.071

Zuo, X.-N., Kelly, C., Di Martino, A., Mennes, M., Margulies, D. S.,
Bangaru, S., … Milham, M. P. (2010). Growing together and growing
apart: Regional and sex differences in the lifespan developmental tra-
jectories of functional homotopy. Journal of Neuroscience, 30,
15034–15043. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2612-10.2010

Neurobiology of Language

184

l

D
o
w
N
o
UN
D
e
D

F
R
o
M
H

T
T

P

:
/
/

D
io
R
e
C
T
.

M

io
T
.

e
D
tu
N
o

/

l
/

l

UN
R
T
io
C
e
–
P
D

F
/

/

/

/

1
2
1
6
1
1
8
6
7
6
9
1
N
o
_
UN
_
0
0
0
0
7
P
D

/

.

l

F

B
sì
G
tu
e
S
T

T

o
N
0
7
S
e
P
e
M
B
e
R
2
0
2
3

Scarica il pdf