Potential Growth in Asia and Its Determinants:
An Empirical Investigation
MATTEO LANZAFAME
∗
This paper contributes to the literature on growth in Asia in several respects. je
provide estimates of potential growth for 21 Asian economies using an aggregate
supply model with time-varying parameters and a Kalman filtering methodology.
My estimates indicate that the actual growth slowdown experienced by many of
these economies in the 2000s is associated with a falling trajectory in potential
growth. Relying on Bayesian model averaging, I select robust determinants of
potential growth and find that the latter is driven by the technology gap, trade,
tertiary education, and institutional quality, as well as by working-age population
growth. Effective reforms in these areas can help counterbalance declines in
potential growth in Asia. I also investigate the relationship between business
cycle features and potential growth, finding that higher volatility in actual growth
has significantly negative effects on potential growth. Ainsi, stabilization policies
can have beneficial effects on Asian economies’ long-term growth performance.
Mots clés: Asian economies, Kalman filter, potential growth
Codes JEL: C23, O40, O47
je. Introduction
Many Asian economies have enjoyed a remarkable growth performance over
the last 3 decades. With annual growth rates often close to 8%–10%, the People’s
Republic of China (RPC) and Southeast Asian economies, in particular, have been
referred to as growth miracles and their experience has fueled a growing debate in
the economic literature regarding the determinants of this performance and whether
it can be replicated in other emerging economies. Growth theory indicates that, dans
the long run, economies tend to grow at a rate consistent with the full utilization of
productive resources, which is known as the natural or potential growth rate (voir, pour
example, Blinder and Solow 1973, Le´on–Ledesma and Thirlwall 2002). Short-term
shocks can lead to temporary deviations from the potential growth rate that give
rise to changes in unemployment and inflation. Over time, these changes will be
corrected via the adjustment of relative prices, and growth will return to its potential
∗Matteo Lanzafame: Department of Economics, University of Messina, Italy. E-mail: mlanzafame@unime.it. Le
author would like to thank the participants at the Asian Development Outlook–Asian Development Review Conference
held in Seoul in November 2015, le rédacteur en chef, and an anonymous referee for helpful comments. He would also
like to thank Noli Sotocinal and Connie Bayudan–Dacuycuy for excellent research assistance. The usual disclaimer
applies.
Revue du développement en Asie, vol. 33, Non. 2, pp. 1–27
C(cid:3) 2016 Banque asiatique de développement
et Institut de la Banque asiatique de développement
je
D
o
w
n
o
un
d
e
d
F
r
o
m
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
d
je
r
e
c
t
.
m
je
t
.
/
e
d
toi
un
d
e
v
/
un
r
t
je
c
e
–
p
d
je
F
/
/
/
/
/
3
3
2
1
1
6
4
2
9
3
2
un
d
e
v
_
un
_
0
0
0
7
0
p
d
.
F
b
oui
g
toi
e
s
t
t
o
n
0
8
S
e
p
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
2
3
2 ASIAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
rate. There is wide agreement that the persistently high growth rates characterizing
Asian economies reflect their high potential growth rates.
Though still generally higher than that of other emerging and advanced
économies, average growth in Asia has declined in the last decade. In many cases,
growth performance seems to have deteriorated since the 2008–2009 global financial
crise. This raises the question of whether such a decline reflects a transitory (though
persistent) deviation of actual growth from the potential growth rate, or if it signals
a fall in the potential growth rate itself. If Asian economies are entering a new phase
of permanently lower long-run growth, there will be implications for a number of
economic and social policies.
This paper proposes an empirical investigation of the issues discussed above.
I estimate the potential growth rate for a sample of 21 Asian economies, relying on
an unbalanced panel of annual data over the period 1960–2014. Given my interest in
the dynamics of potential growth in Asia, my approach is based on a time-varying
parameter aggregate supply (AS) model that is consistent with the concept of the
natural growth rate proposed by Harrod (1939) and its relation to Okun’s Law and
the Phillips curve. I consider different versions of the AS model and estimate it via a
Kalman filtering methodology to obtain time-series estimates of Asian economies’
potential growth rates. I find that the potential growth rate of most Asian economies
has been on a downward trajectory since the 2000s, and that this pattern either
continued or worsened during 2008–2014. In most cases, the estimated potential
growth rate was lower in 2014 than during 2000–2007. Given that actual growth
will tend to return to the potential growth rate in the long term, this outcome raises
concerns regarding the growth performance of Asian economies in the medium
to long term, and reinforces the need to investigate the determinants of potential
growth.
To carry out this task, I rely on a larger panel of annual data for 69 advanced
and emerging economies over the period 1960–2014. The objective is to obtain
more efficient and reliable estimates, exploiting the additional information that
is available beyond the data in the sample of 21 Asian economies. From an
econometric viewpoint, my search for robust determinants of potential growth is
based on a recently proposed methodology for model selection: the Bayesian model
averaging (BMA) approach developed by Magnus, Powell, and Pr¨ufer (2010) for the
estimation of classical linear regression models with uncertainty about the choice
of the explanatory variables. Harrod’s natural growth rate is defined as the sum
of the growth rates of labor productivity and the labor force. I introduce (trend)
working-age population growth (used as a proxy for labor force growth) dans le
model as a fixed regressor, while letting BMA estimations select the additional
robust regressors. I find that out of 35 variables considered, seven are considered to
be robust determinants of potential growth. My estimates confirm that the growth
rate of the working-age population has a direct relationship with potential growth,
as suggested by theory, with a 1% increase in this variable leading a similar increase
in the potential growth rate. The implication is that, as with advanced economies,
je
D
o
w
n
o
un
d
e
d
F
r
o
m
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
d
je
r
e
c
t
.
m
je
t
.
/
e
d
toi
un
d
e
v
/
un
r
t
je
c
e
–
p
d
je
F
/
/
/
/
/
3
3
2
1
1
6
4
2
9
3
2
un
d
e
v
_
un
_
0
0
0
7
0
p
d
.
F
b
oui
g
toi
e
s
t
t
o
n
0
8
S
e
p
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
2
3
POTENTIAL GROWTH IN ASIA AND ITS DETERMINANTS 3
aging populations will gradually become a significant drag on (potential) growth in
emerging Asian economies such as the PRC. Other variables that play a significant
role in shaping the trajectory of the potential growth rate include a proxy for the
technology gap (as measured by an economy’s differences with the United States
[NOUS]), a measure of tertiary education levels, proxies for labor market rigidity, et
proxies for institutional quality (as measured by indexes for perceived government
efficiency and accountability). Integration with the world economy via trade and
financial links is also important and has the expected positive impact on potential
growth. En particulier, the effects of financial integration depend on the quality
of institutions. I find that economies characterized by lower perceived regulatory
quality enjoy positive effects from greater connection to international financial
marchés, but these gains gradually disappear as institutional quality increases.
Dans l'ensemble, the results indicate that effective economic policy interventions and, plus
generally, improvements in institutional quality (par exemple., more flexible labor markets,
more efficient and accountable government) have the potential to positively affect the
trajectory of potential growth, thus counteracting the effects of the recent slowdown
in many Asian economies.
Suivant, I turn to the question of whether the 2008–2009 global financial crisis
left persistent, or even permanent, scars on the potential growth rates of Asian
économies. For this to be the case, potential growth should be endogenous with
respect to the actual growth rate (ou, more generally, business cycle features such
as deviations of the actual from the potential growth rate and growth volatility).
I investigate this hypothesis using two different approaches and find that a higher
volatility of actual growth with respect to the potential growth rate has a significantly
negative impact on the latter. This result suggests that policy measures leading to a
more stable macroeconomic and growth environment can have long-lasting positive
effects on growth performance. On the other hand, my estimates do not provide
evidence indicating that short-term deviations from actual growth affect the potential
growth rate, either positively or negatively. Taken at face value, this result indicates
that the effects of the 2008–2009 global financial crisis on potential growth rates in
Asia, however deep and persistent, will not be permanent.
The remainder of the paper is organized as follows. The next section describes
the model and empirical methodology used to estimate the potential growth rates
of my sample of Asian economies. Section III is devoted to the investigation of
the determinants of potential growth. Section IV considers the relationship between
business cycle features and the dynamics of the natural or potential growth rate.
Section V concludes.
II. Model and Estimation Methodology
The concept of the natural rate of growth was formally introduced in growth
theory by Harrod (1939), who defined it as the sum of the growth rates of the labor
je
D
o
w
n
o
un
d
e
d
F
r
o
m
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
d
je
r
e
c
t
.
m
je
t
.
/
e
d
toi
un
d
e
v
/
un
r
t
je
c
e
–
p
d
je
F
/
/
/
/
/
3
3
2
1
1
6
4
2
9
3
2
un
d
e
v
_
un
_
0
0
0
7
0
p
d
.
F
b
oui
g
toi
e
s
t
t
o
n
0
8
S
e
p
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
2
3
4 ASIAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
force and labor productivity, both of which were assumed to be exogenous. Ce
implies that Harrod’s natural rate of growth is the particular growth rate associated
with full employment and a stable inflation rate. En tant que tel, the role played by the
natural growth rate is twofold: it is both the trend growth rate of the economy and the
short-term upward limit to (noninflationary) growth that turns cyclical expansions
into recessions.
Since the natural growth rate is defined as the sum of the growth rates
of labor productivity and the labor force, unemployment will rise whenever the
actual rate of growth (gt ) falls below the natural rate, and it will fall when gt rises
above g N ; c'est, the natural rate of growth is the particular growth rate consistent
with a nonchanging unemployment rate. Ainsi, a simple estimation framework to
pin down the value of g N is provided by the following specification of Okun’s
Loi:
(cid:2)Ut = σ − ςgt
(1)
où (cid:2)Ut is the percentage change in the unemployment rate Ut , and gt is the
growth rate of output.
This specification has been widely used in the literature to estimate g N
for economies and regions and, among other things, to investigate its possible
endogeneity (voir, Par exemple, Le´on–Ledesma and Thirlwall 2002, Lanzafame
2010). For my purposes, the specification in equation (1) presents two drawbacks. Il
produces a single estimate of the natural or potential growth rate for the time period
under analysis, while I am interested in studying its evolution over time. Ainsi, je
rely on a time-varying-parameter approach to estimate a time series for g N
t ; on the
other hand, unemployment (including underemployment) and labor market data in
general are notoriously unreliable for some of the economies in my panel. To address
ce, I link Harrod’s definition of g N to the relationship between unemployment and
growth, and estimate the natural or potential growth rates of Asian economies relying
on an AS model. Since in the long run, unemployment will be constant when it is
equal to the nonaccelerating inflation rate of unemployment, the natural growth rate
t and, thus, (cid:2)Ut = 0. je
can be defined as the growth rate consistent with Ut = U N
formalize this in Okun’s relation as
Ut = U N
t
− βt
(cid:3)
(cid:2)
gt − g N
t
(2)
where the Okun coefficient
unemployment (U N
inflation and unemployment is given by the following Phillips curve in which
(βt ) and the nonaccelerating inflation rate of
t ) are assumed to be time varying. The relationship between
πt = π e
t
− γt
(cid:2)
Ut − U N
t
(cid:3)
(3)
je
D
o
w
n
o
un
d
e
d
F
r
o
m
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
d
je
r
e
c
t
.
m
je
t
.
/
e
d
toi
un
d
e
v
/
un
r
t
je
c
e
–
p
d
je
F
/
/
/
/
/
3
3
2
1
1
6
4
2
9
3
2
un
d
e
v
_
un
_
0
0
0
7
0
p
d
.
F
b
oui
g
toi
e
s
t
t
o
n
0
8
S
e
p
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
2
3
POTENTIAL GROWTH IN ASIA AND ITS DETERMINANTS 5
where πt and π e
a time-varying parameter. Combining equations (2) et (3), I get
t are, respectivement, the actual and expected inflation rates, while γt is
πt = π e
t
+ φt
(cid:3)
(cid:2)
gt − g N
t
(4)
where φt = βt γt . The specification in equation (4) formalizes an AS model with
time-varying parameters.
To estimate the model in equation (4), I need an estimate of the expected
inflation rate, π e
t . Since there is very limited availability of time-series data for
t as a function of the actual inflation rate (πt ), assuming
expected inflation, I model π e
two possible specifications. The first is in equation (5), where expected inflation in
time t is a time-varying function of actual inflation in t:
π e
t
= αt πt + εt
(5)
where αt is a time-varying parameter reflecting the public’s degree of accuracy in
forecasting inflation and εt is an independent normally distributed error term, avec
zero mean and constant variance. The estimated model in this case is
gt = g N
t
+
(1 − αt )
φt
πt + εt
(6)
The second specification assumes an extreme form of adaptive expectations in which
expected inflation in t is equal to actual inflation in t − 1 plus a random error term:
π e
t
= πt−1 + εt
and the relative model is
gt = g N
t
+ 1
φt
(cid:2)πt + εt
(7)
(8)
Equations (6) et (8) can both be specified in state-space form. Specifically, le
measurement equations are
gt = μt + βt πt + εt
gt = μt + βt (cid:2)πt + εt
(6')
(8')
with μt = g N
t . Following standard practice in the literature (voir, Par exemple, Harvey
1989), to capture possible level breaks or trend patterns, the transition equations are
je
D
o
w
n
o
un
d
e
d
F
r
o
m
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
d
je
r
e
c
t
.
m
je
t
.
/
e
d
toi
un
d
e
v
/
un
r
t
je
c
e
–
p
d
je
F
/
/
/
/
/
3
3
2
1
1
6
4
2
9
3
2
un
d
e
v
_
un
_
0
0
0
7
0
p
d
.
F
b
oui
g
toi
e
s
t
t
o
n
0
8
S
e
p
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
2
3
6 ASIAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
assumed to follow a unit root:
μt = μt−1 + υt
βt = βt−1 + υt
(9)
(10)
Following Romer (1993), I take account of the possible effects of the degree of
openness on the slope of the Phillips curve, and thus of the AS models in equations
(6') et (8'), and also consider the following transition equation for βt :
βt = βt−1 + κmt + υt
(11)
where mt is the share of imports in gross domestic product (PIB). For each economy,
I select the most appropriate version of the model according to the significance of
the estimated parameters and rely on the Akaike Information Criterion.1
My estimation is carried out relying on the Kalman filter recursive algorithm,
which is commonly used in the literature to obtain optimal estimates for state
variables in models with time-varying parameters (voir, Par exemple, Lanzafame and
Nogueira 2011). More specifically, to obtain a time series for the potential growth
rate g N
t , I apply the Kalman smoothing procedure, which uses all the information
in the sample to provide smoothed-state estimates. This procedure differs from
Kalman filtering in the construction of the state series, as this technique uses only
the information available up to the beginning of the estimation period. Smoothed
series tend to produce more gradual changes than filtered ones and, as discussed by
Sims (2001), they provide more precise estimates of the actual time variation in the
data.
Chiffre 1 below presents estimated potential growth rates and actual growth
rates for 12 Asian economies, including the region’s four most developed economies
and eight largest economies. The corresponding graphs for all other Asian economies
are included in Figure A.1 in the Appendix.
Dans l'ensemble, the Kalman smoother seems to perform well in fitting the data, both in
terms of the significance of the regressors and in providing a realistic approximation
for the long-run growth paths of Asian economies. The estimates show the potential
growth rate as being more stable than the actual growth rate, as well as being fairly
high and/or increasing in the 1980s and 1990s for most economies, which is in
line with expectations. It can also be seen that in most cases, the estimated potential
growth rate declined in the 2000s and with few exceptions, this trend either remained
stable or worsened during the period 2008–2014. Comparisons between the mean
1As an alternative, I also considered a different model augmented with financial factors along the lines of
Felipe, Sotocinal, and Bayudan–Dacuycuy (2015). This turned out to be the most appropriate model only in the cases
of Thailand and Singapore.
je
D
o
w
n
o
un
d
e
d
F
r
o
m
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
d
je
r
e
c
t
.
m
je
t
.
/
e
d
toi
un
d
e
v
/
un
r
t
je
c
e
–
p
d
je
F
/
/
/
/
/
3
3
2
1
1
6
4
2
9
3
2
un
d
e
v
_
un
_
0
0
0
7
0
p
d
.
F
b
oui
g
toi
e
s
t
t
o
n
0
8
S
e
p
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
2
3
POTENTIAL GROWTH IN ASIA AND ITS DETERMINANTS 7
Chiffre 1. Actual and Potential Growth Rates in Select Asian Economies
je
D
o
w
n
o
un
d
e
d
F
r
o
m
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
d
je
r
e
c
t
.
m
je
t
.
/
e
d
toi
un
d
e
v
/
un
r
t
je
c
e
–
p
d
je
F
/
/
/
/
/
3
3
2
1
1
6
4
2
9
3
2
un
d
e
v
_
un
_
0
0
0
7
0
p
d
.
F
b
oui
g
toi
e
s
t
t
o
n
0
8
S
e
p
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
2
3
8 ASIAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
Chiffre 1. Continued.
je
D
o
w
n
o
un
d
e
d
F
r
o
m
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
d
je
r
e
c
t
.
m
je
t
.
/
e
d
toi
un
d
e
v
/
un
r
t
je
c
e
–
p
d
je
F
/
/
/
/
/
3
3
2
1
1
6
4
2
9
3
2
un
d
e
v
_
un
_
0
0
0
7
0
p
d
.
F
b
oui
g
toi
e
s
t
t
o
n
0
8
S
e
p
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
2
3
Source: Author’s calculations.
values for the 2000–2007 and 2008–2014 periods (et le 2014 estimates), lequel
are reported in Table 1, confirm that this is the case.
As mentioned, a falling potential growth rate has significant negative
consequences for an economy that can be particularly difficult to cope with in an
emerging economy. Ainsi, an analysis of what drives potential growth and whether
its determinants may be influenced by policy interventions is of critical importance
for emerging Asian economies.
III. Determinants of Potential Growth
Having obtained time-series estimates for g N
t
for all Asian economies in my
panel, in this section, I turn to the investigation of the determinants of the potential
growth rate. My objective is to obtain robust and reliable estimates of variables that
are significantly correlated with the potential growth rate. Pour y parvenir, I extend
the unbalanced panel to a group of 69 economies to include several other emerging
and advanced non-Asian economies. The list of economies included in the panel is
presented in Table A.1 in the Appendix.
My definition of potential growth is consistent with Harrod’s (1939) concept
of the natural growth rate represented as the sum of the growth rates of labor
productivity and the labor force; thus, in my search for the main drivers of g N
t , je
POTENTIAL GROWTH IN ASIA AND ITS DETERMINANTS 9
Tableau 1. Mean Estimates of Potential Growth Rates
(%)
Azerbaijan Bangladesh Cambodia
5.84
5.97
6.12
17.90
5.26
3.03
9.26
7.42
7.08
2000–2007
2008–2014
2014
RPC
9.90
8.80
7.91
Hong Kong,
Chine
4.83
3.01
2.25
India
7.03
6.97
6.29
Indonésie
4.95
5.81
5.01
2000–2007
2008–2014
2014
Japan
1.63
0.24
0.15
Republic
Kazakhstan of Korea Malaysia
8.77
6.81
5.05
5.58
3.49
3.33
5.27
5.02
5.81
Pakistan
4.04
4.93
5.40
Philippines Singapore
6.58
7.06
7.90
4.05
2.36
4.10
Sri Lanka Taipei,China Tajikistan Thailand Turkmenistan Uzbekistan Viet Nam
5.44
0.15
2.90
15.48
11.03
10.28
6.67
5.58
6.84
8.46
6.93
6.74
6.12
8.34
8.13
4.70
3.34
3.06
7.38
6.01
6.06
2000–2007
2008–2014
2014
PRC = People’s Republic of China.
Source: Author’s calculations.
need to take account of both of its components. As mentioned, labor market data
are not entirely reliable for Asian economies and emerging economies in general.
Donc, I proxy labor force growth using data on working-age population growth,
duly filtered to purge short-term variability (par exemple., transitory migration flows) et
obtain a better estimate for potential long-term labor force growth.2 However, le
search for the determinants of productivity growth is more complex and many
possible determinants are considered in the literature.
Faced with this issue, a number of recent studies have implemented various
model selection procedures to ascertain which variables have a robust association
with economic growth (voir, Par exemple, Fern´andez and Steel 2001; Sala-i-Martin,
Doppelhoffer, and Miller 2004). In this paper, I rely on the version of the BMA
approach developed by Magnus, Powell, and Pr¨ufer (2010) for the estimation
of classical linear regression models with uncertainty about the choice of the
explanatory variables. This estimator fits the model nicely and the approach used in
this paper is based on a classical linear regression framework with two subsets of
explanatory variables: (je) The “focus regressors,” which are explanatory variables
always included in the model for theoretical reasons or other considerations about
the phenomenon under investigation. In my case, the growth rate of the working-age
population (gwap) is one such focus regressor; et (ii) The “auxiliary regressors,»
which are additional explanatory variables whose inclusion in the model is less
certain. The problem of model uncertainty and variable selection arises because
2I rely upon the frequency domain filter developed by Corbae, Ouliaris, and Philipps (2002) and Corbae and
Ouliaris (2006).
je
D
o
w
n
o
un
d
e
d
F
r
o
m
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
d
je
r
e
c
t
.
m
je
t
.
/
e
d
toi
un
d
e
v
/
un
r
t
je
c
e
–
p
d
je
F
/
/
/
/
/
3
3
2
1
1
6
4
2
9
3
2
un
d
e
v
_
un
_
0
0
0
7
0
p
d
.
F
b
oui
g
toi
e
s
t
t
o
n
0
8
S
e
p
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
2
3
10 ASIAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
different subsets of auxiliary regressors can be excluded from the model to improve
(in the mean-squared error sense) the unrestricted ordinary least squares estimates.
When there are k2 auxiliary regressors, the number of possible models to be
considered is 2k2. The BMA estimator provides a coherent method of inference
on the regression parameters of interest by taking explicit account of the uncertainty
due to both the estimation and the model selection steps. The BMA estimator uses
conventional noninformative priors on the focus parameters and the error variance,
and a multivariate Gaussian prior on the auxiliary parameters. The unconditional
BMA estimates are obtained as a weighted average of the estimates from each of the
possible models in the model space, with weights proportional to the marginal
likelihood of the dependent variable in each model. An auxiliary regressor is
considered to be robust if the t ratio on its coefficient is greater than 1 in absolute
value or, equivalently, the corresponding one-standard error band does not include
zero. Alternativement, researchers can rely on their posterior inclusion probabilities.
Masanjala and Papageorgiou (2008) suggest that a posterior inclusion probability
de 0.5 corresponds approximately to a t ratio of 1 in absolute value.3
Despite being a useful tool for establishing a set of robust regressors given
a large set of possible explanatory variables, the BMA approach also has some
weaknesses. Ciccone and Jarocinski (2010), Par exemple, show that the results
of BMA estimations can be highly sensitive to measurement errors. Ghosh and
Ghattas (2015) show that high collinearity in three or more covariates tends to push
the posterior inclusion probabilities downward and that all collinear variables may
be falsely excluded.4 Sala-i-Martin, Doppelhofer, and Miller (2004) note that the
BMA approach’s emphasis on marginal measures of variable importance make it
difficult (if not impossible) to detect dependence among explanatory variables. Ils
stress that the extent of interdependence between explanatory variables will affect
the posterior inclusion probability of any given model, as well as the form of the
posterior probability distribution of variables over the model space.
To deal with these issues, I implement a hybrid two-stage approach. In the
first stage, I exploit the properties of the BMA methodology by Magnus, Powell,
and Pr¨ufer (2010) to assess the robustness of possible determinants of potential
growth. Since some of the variables in my data set have very high correlations, je
implement successive BMA estimation procedures to eliminate redundant indicators
from the analysis and further reduce the model space by removing variables that are
not robust. In doing this, I estimate multiple specifications of the model by adding
highly collinear robust determinants (par exemple., institutional quality variables) one at a
3While the BMA helps deal with model uncertainty, it does not deal with issues of causality. Ainsi, le
definition of regressors as robust should be intended as indicating that they are significantly correlated with potential
growth.
4En particulier, Ghosh and Ghattas (2015) note that strong collinearity leads to a multimodal posterior
distribution such that if there are three or more highly collinear variables, the median probability model could
potentially discard all of them.
je
D
o
w
n
o
un
d
e
d
F
r
o
m
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
d
je
r
e
c
t
.
m
je
t
.
/
e
d
toi
un
d
e
v
/
un
r
t
je
c
e
–
p
d
je
F
/
/
/
/
/
3
3
2
1
1
6
4
2
9
3
2
un
d
e
v
_
un
_
0
0
0
7
0
p
d
.
F
b
oui
g
toi
e
s
t
t
o
n
0
8
S
e
p
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
2
3
POTENTIAL GROWTH IN ASIA AND ITS DETERMINANTS 11
temps. In the second stage, the robust determinants that are identified using the BMA
approach are used as regressors in a fixed effects panel data regression to gauge
their effects on potential output growth. I also consider the possible presence of
nonlinearities and test separately for the significance of interaction effects between
an index of financial integration (selected as a robust determinant of potential growth
by the BMA methodology) and institutional quality variables, which is in line with
the literature on the nonlinearity of effects of financial openness on economic growth.
I also examine whether there is a statistically significant interaction effect between
institutional quality and the technology gap with the US, which is another regressor
defined as robust by the BMA approach.
A detailed description of the two stages and the associated results are
presented in the next section.
UN.
BMA and Fixed Effects Results
I consider 35 potential determinants of g N
t , including the focus regressor
gwap. These potential determinants and their definitions and data sources are
presented in Table A.2 in the Appendix. Since the potential growth rate is the
particular rate toward which actual growth tends in the long run, the set of
determinants of potential growth I consider reflects a broad set of variables typically
deemed to affect actual growth in the long run. To control for the presence of fixed
effects, I applied the forward-orthogonal-deviation transformation to the data before
implementing the BMA procedure. The number of possible determinants considered
is much larger than those included in a typical growth regression, but my data set
contains variables that can be considered to be close alternatives (par exemple., proxies for
éducation, openness, and institutional quality) and are highly correlated. Ainsi, comme
well as using all 35 variables at once, I also carried out BMA regressions using
subsets of the various proxies to reduce the computation burden and the number of
auxiliary regressors, as well as to lessen the impacts of the presence of correlated
regressors in the BMA analysis. I then excluded from the final specification the ones
that never turned out to be robust. Following this approach, I reduced the number
of possibly robust auxiliary regressors to 13. The BMA results for this specification
are reported in Table 2.
As can be seen, out of the 13 auxiliary regressors, only seven are selected
by the BMA approach as robust determinants of potential growth with a posterior
inclusion probability equal to or greater than 0.5: (je) gross enrollment ratio in tertiary
éducation (es3enrot); (ii) technology gap vis-`a-vis the US (gap); (iii) degree of labor
market rigidity (lamrig); (iv) et (v) two indexes reflecting aspects of perceived
institutional quality (voice and accountability index, voa; government efficiency
index, goveff); (vi) trade-to-GDP ratio (trade); et (vii) a proxy of integration into
international financial markets (ratio of overall financial flows with respect to GDP,
integr).
je
D
o
w
n
o
un
d
e
d
F
r
o
m
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
d
je
r
e
c
t
.
m
je
t
.
/
e
d
toi
un
d
e
v
/
un
r
t
je
c
e
–
p
d
je
F
/
/
/
/
/
3
3
2
1
1
6
4
2
9
3
2
un
d
e
v
_
un
_
0
0
0
7
0
p
d
.
F
b
oui
g
toi
e
s
t
t
o
n
0
8
S
e
p
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
2
3
12 ASIAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
Tableau 2. Bayesian Model Averaging Estimates
Coefficient
0.697
0.002
−0.459
0.295
−0.006
0.004
−0.089
0.046
0.031
2.276
−0.002
−1.328
0.029
0.712
gwap
agrempsh
di16merdt
es10schom
es1enrop
es2enros
es3enrot
finref
gap
goveff
integr
lamrig
trade
voa
Model space: 8,192 models
pip = posterior inclusion probability, SD = standard deviation.
Note: Bold signifies a pip exceeding 0.5.
Source: Author’s calculations.
t_stat
SD
2.560
0.273
0.013
0.160
0.683 −0.670
0.750
0.395
0.020 −0.310
0.011
0.380
0.021 −4.240
0.080
0.572
1.040
0.030
0.759
3.000
0.001 −2.550
1.245 −1.070
3.160
0.009
0.860
0.829
pip
1-SD Band
0.424
1.000
0.070 −0.011
0.380 −1.142
0.430 −0.101
0.130 −0.026
0.180 −0.007
1.000 −0.110
0.060 −0.526
0.001
0.610
1.517
0.970
0.940 −0.003
0.610 −2.573
0.020
0.980
0.500 −0.118
0.970
0.015
0.224
0.690
0.014
0.016
−0.068
0.618
0.061
3.035
−0.001
−0.083
0.038
1.541
je
D
o
w
n
o
un
d
e
d
F
r
o
m
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
d
je
r
e
c
t
.
m
je
t
.
In the next step of my empirical investigation, I exclude from the analysis the
variables that turned out not to be robust using the BMA estimation and, relying on
the standard fixed effects technique, estimate the following model for all economies
in my panel as well as for the subpanel of Asian economies:
g N
it
= ηi + θ1gwapit
+ θ5intergrit
+ θ2es3enrotit + θ3gapit
+ θ6lamrigit
+ θ7tradeit + θ8voait + ξit
+ θ4goveffit
(12)
To control for the effects of the possible presence of cross-sectional dependence
in the error term, I rely on Driscoll and Kraay (1998) for standard errors, lequel
assume the error structure to be heteroskedastic, autocorrelated (up to some lag),
and possibly correlated between the groups. En tant que tel, Driscoll–Kraay standard errors
are robust to very general forms of temporal dependence and/or cross-sectional
dependence due to, Par exemple, spatial correlation or time effects.
The results from equation (12), reported in the first two columns on the
left-hand side of Table 3, are very much in line with expectations for all economies
and Asian economies, even though the latter are based on a fairly small sample size.
En particulier, the coefficient on gwap, which is the elasticity of potential output with
respect to the working-age population, is significant and very close to 1, suggérant
that a 1% increase in the working-age population leads to a 1% increase in potential
output growth. This is consistent with the definition of the natural or potential
growth rate used in this paper and indicates that gwap is a good proxy for the
potential long-run growth rate of the labor force. The signs of all other variables are
also as expected, with the possible exception of tertiary enrollment (es3enrot) et
/
e
d
toi
un
d
e
v
/
un
r
t
je
c
e
–
p
d
je
F
/
/
/
/
/
3
3
2
1
1
6
4
2
9
3
2
un
d
e
v
_
un
_
0
0
0
7
0
p
d
.
F
b
oui
g
toi
e
s
t
t
o
n
0
8
S
e
p
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
2
3
POTENTIAL GROWTH IN ASIA AND ITS DETERMINANTS 13
Tableau 3. Determinants of g N
t : Fixed Effects Estimations
All Economies Asian Economies
All Economies
1.002∗∗
0.867∗∗
0.158∗∗
−0.001∗∗
0.042∗
–
0.963∗
−0.003
–
−1.933∗∗
0.082∗∗
1.157∗∗
0.163∗∗
−0.002∗∗
0.073∗
−0.006∗
1.361∗∗
0.004∧
−0.003∗∗
−2.924∗∗
0.065∗∗
−0.0001∗∗ −0.0001∗∗
gwap
es3enrot
es3enrot_sq
gap
gap_ polstab
goveff
integr
integr_regq
lamrig
trade
trade_sq
voa
dummy0814
Constant
F-statistic for H0 : θ1 = 1
Non. of economies
Non. of observations
Remarques: ∗∗∗, ∗∗, and ∗ indicate significance at the 1%, 5%, et 10% level, respectivement. Variables
instrumented with first lag. Standard errors from Driscoll and Kraay (1998) used.
Source: Author’s calculations.
0.942∧
−0.155∗∗
–
0.097∧
–
2.824∗
−0.001
–
−8.757∗∗
0.063∗∗
–
−1.070∗
–
7.120
0.01
18
188
−0.052
–
0.069∗∗
–
1.147∗
−0.003∗∗
–
−1.619∗
0.054∗∗
–
1.456∗∗
–
−0.995
0.00
61
655
0.726∗
−2.432∗∗
−5.014∗∗
0.39
61
655
1.651∧
−2.727∗∗
−5.576∗∗
0.51
61
425
the financial integration index (integr), both of which enter the regression with a
negative sign.
These last results are somewhat puzzling and warrant further investigation,
which I carry out by modifying the model in two steps to allow for some form
of nonlinearity.5 In the first step, I start by assessing whether the regressors in
equation (12) may affect potential growth nonlinearly. Extending the model with
the introduction of various quadratic terms, I find that this is the case for both
es3enrot and trade. Fait intéressant, the coefficient on the quadratic term es3enrot_sq
is negative, but once this is included in the model, es3enrot enters with a significantly
positive sign; c'est, enrollment in tertiary education affects g N
t positively, but its
impact decreases as es3enrot rises. The outcomes for trade and trade_sq are the
same. De plus, the evidence of a significant downward shift in potential growth
during 2008–2014 due to the global financial crisis points to the possibility of a
structural break in the g N
t series for many economies. To control for this, I introduce
an intercept dummy variable (dummy0814) equal to 1 for the period 2008–2014
and zero otherwise. The dummy turns out to be negative and strongly statistically
significant. These changes to the benchmark model result in the specification in the
third column in Table 3, where I can see that all other results remain fairly similar.
En particulier, the financial integration index (integr) still enters with a negative sign,
even though it is not significant.
5Because of the small panel size, the estimation of this extended model is not feasible for the subpanel of
Asian economies.
je
D
o
w
n
o
un
d
e
d
F
r
o
m
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
d
je
r
e
c
t
.
m
je
t
.
/
e
d
toi
un
d
e
v
/
un
r
t
je
c
e
–
p
d
je
F
/
/
/
/
/
3
3
2
1
1
6
4
2
9
3
2
un
d
e
v
_
un
_
0
0
0
7
0
p
d
.
F
b
oui
g
toi
e
s
t
t
o
n
0
8
S
e
p
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
2
3
14 ASIAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
In the second step of the benchmark model extension, I consider whether
institutional quality may affect potential growth not only directly, as indicated by the
significant coefficients on goveff, lamrig, and voa, but also via indirect channels. Il
has been suggested that the effects of integration on international financial markets
may depend on institutional quality (voir, Par exemple, Kose et al. 2009). Similar
arguments have been advanced on the potential benefits associated with technology
spillovers. To explore this possibility, I interact the gap and integr variables with
a number of proxies for the quality of institutions. If (on average) the impacts of
the technology gap and integration indexes depend on institutional quality, then the
interaction terms should turn out to be significant. I find that this is the case when the
gap variable is interacted with the index of political stability (gap_polstab), alors que
the effects of integr on the potential growth rate appear to depend significantly on
regulatory quality (regq). Results are reported in the last column of Table 3.
The estimates show that once the interaction terms are introduced as
variables on the right-hand side, integr turns positive and is significant at the
10% level, while gap remains positive and significant too; the interaction terms
are always negative and significant. The interaction terms are constructed as simple
products of the gap and integration indexes with the institutional quality indexes:
gap polstab = gap × polstab and integr regq = integr × regq. En tant que tel, the sign,
size, and significance of the effect of gap and integr on the potential growth rate
will vary according to the value of the institutional quality index. Using regq
and integr as an example, if θ5 is the estimated coefficient on integr and θ5 1 le
estimated coefficient on integr_regq, then the overall impact of financial integration
is given by (θ5 + θ5 1 × r egq). The size and significance of this product will vary for
different values of regq. The institutional quality indexes range from –2.5 (weak)
à 2.5 (fort) to reflect governance performance. To test for the effect of the
financial integration index, I can conduct a series of F-tests to determine whether
(θ5 + θ5 1 × r egq) is significantly different from zero for different values of regq.
The F-tests conducted show that, when taking into account institutional
quality via the interaction term, the overall impact of financial integration is positive
and significant for r egq < (0.5). This indicates that financial integration has larger
positive effects on potential growth for economies with weaker institutions, thus
acting as a substitute for high-quality institutions. For emerging economies with
weaker institutions, including some of the Asian economies in my sample, the
implication is that successful integration into international financial markets may
bring about significant long-term growth benefits by raising the potential growth
rate. Meanwhile, the gap variable has a positive and significant impact on potential
growth for the entire range of polstab values, but again its effect is smaller
for economies with better institutions (as proxied by greater political stability).
This is not surprising since emerging economies, which can be expected to reap
larger benefits from technology spillovers, are also characterized by lower polstab
values.
l
D
o
w
n
o
a
d
e
d
f
r
o
m
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
d
i
r
e
c
t
.
m
i
t
.
/
e
d
u
a
d
e
v
/
a
r
t
i
c
e
-
p
d
l
f
/
/
/
/
/
3
3
2
1
1
6
4
2
9
3
2
a
d
e
v
_
a
_
0
0
0
7
0
p
d
.
f
b
y
g
u
e
s
t
t
o
n
0
8
S
e
p
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
2
3
POTENTIAL GROWTH IN ASIA AND ITS DETERMINANTS 15
The BMA procedure and the estimates reported in Table 3 depict a fairly
clear picture of the main determinants of potential growth. From a policy viewpoint,
the main result of this analysis is that institutional quality and other supply-side
characteristics matter for potential growth. Structural reforms in these areas can
significantly improve long-term growth performance. In the next section, I address
the question of whether demand-management policies can play a role too.
IV. Business Cycles and the Endogeneity of Potential Growth
Standard macroeconomic theory assumes business cycles and potential
growth as separate phenomena. As a result, business cycle features such as the
depth of a recession are deemed to have no significant effects on long-term economic
growth. Recent theoretical and empirical contributions, however, have challenged
this view (see, for example, Christopoulos and Le´on–Ledesma 2014), while the
length and significant economic impacts of the 2008–2009 global financial crisis
have reignited the debate on the relationship between short- and long-term growth.
This issue takes on particular importance in Asia as the PRC and other economies
have seen their growth performance deteriorate between 2008 and 2014 to the point
that it has been argued this may be the beginning of a “new normal” for growth
patterns in Asia (see, for example, Asian Development Bank 2016). If potential
growth is, at least to some extent, endogenous with respect to actual growth and its
short-term cyclical features, this view may be shown to be correct and the growth
slowdown in Asia may be structural.
As mentioned, Le´on–Ledesma and Thirlwall (2002) develop an econometric
framework that allows us to estimate Harrod’s natural growth rate (g N ) and test for
its endogeneity with respect to the actual growth rate (g). The methodology is based
on two steps. First, an estimate of g N , which is assumed to be constant over time, is
produced using the version of Okun’s Law specified in equation (1) and the condition
that gt = g N when (cid:2)Ut = 0. Next, a reversed version of the Okun’s Law relation
is augmented with a dummy variable (Dgdev
) that takes the value of 1 when gt is
t
greater than the estimated g N (gdevt = gt − g N > 0) and zero otherwise. Ainsi, le
following model is estimated:
gt = η − ψ(cid:2)Ut + λDgdev
t
+ εt
(13)
If the estimated ˆλ is positive and significant, then the actual growth rate needed
in boom periods (gt > g N or, equivalently,
to keep unemployment constant
gdevt > 0) has risen. C'est, the actual growth rate has pulled up the natural
growth rate.
Relying on the definition of g N
t used in this paper, I construct a test for
the endogeneity hypothesis, which is very much in line with the methodology of
Le´on–Ledesma and Thirlwall (2002). I start by noticing that since g N
is defined as
t
je
D
o
w
n
o
un
d
e
d
F
r
o
m
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
d
je
r
e
c
t
.
m
je
t
.
/
e
d
toi
un
d
e
v
/
un
r
t
je
c
e
–
p
d
je
F
/
/
/
/
/
3
3
2
1
1
6
4
2
9
3
2
un
d
e
v
_
un
_
0
0
0
7
0
p
d
.
F
b
oui
g
toi
e
s
t
t
o
n
0
8
S
e
p
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
2
3
16 ASIAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
the particular growth rate consistent with a stable inflation rate, the estimated α in
equation (14) below is expected to be equal to zero, while the estimate of β should
be positive:
gdevt = α + β(cid:2)πt + εt
(14)
Rising inflation ((cid:2)πt > 0) should be associated with an actual growth rate higher
than the potential growth rate (gdevt > 0) so that β > 0; meanwhile, a stable
inflation rate ((cid:2)πt = 0) is expected to correspond to gdevt = 0, so that α = 0.
Introducing Dgdev
to equation (14), I obtain
t
gdevt = α + β(cid:2)πt + λDgdev
t
+ εt
(15)
t
A positive estimate of λ in equation (15) is expected as Dgdev
= 1 when gdevt > 0.
En outre, the size of gdevt in boom periods (gdevB) will be given by the sum
of the two estimates ˆα and ˆλ. Since gdevB is determined by the changes in actual
and potential growth during booms (gdevB = (cid:2)gB − (cid:2)g N
B ), I can test the null
hypothesis H0 : gdevB − (cid:2)gB = 0—if the latter is rejected, it follows that (cid:2)g N
B
is significantly different from zero. C'est, rejection of the null indicates that the
potential growth rate rises when gt > g N
(ou, equivalently, gdevt > 0), which is
t
in line with the endogeneity hypothesis proposed by Le´on–Ledesma and Thirlwall
(2002). Allowing substantially more degrees of freedom than estimations based on
my benchmark model, this testing framework makes it feasible to obtain efficient
estimates of the model parameters for the subpanel of Asian economies. En outre
to the usual fixed effects estimator, I can also rely on the mean-group estimator
(Pesaran and Smith 1995) to allow for parameter heterogeneity.
t
I also investigate the endogeneity of the potential growth rate introducing the
dummy Dgdev
in my benchmark model. Just as in the testing framework proposed by
Le´on–Ledesma and Thirlwall (2002), a positive and significant coefficient on Dgdev
would support the hypothesis that potential growth is, at least to a certain extent,
endogenous to the actual growth rate. Concurrently, I also explore the possibility that
other business cycle features may play a role by including in the model as additional
regressors the following two variables: (je) gdev5t , which is the average deviation of
actual growth from the potential growth rate (gdevt = gt − g N
t ) over the previous
5 années; et (ii) gdev5sdt , which defines the standard deviation of gdevt over the
previous 5 years.6
t
Tableau 4 reports the estimates based on the first approach to testing the
endogeneity hypothesis as formalized in equation (15). Independently of whether I
6I also considered the first lag of gdevt (predetermined with respect to g N
t ) and the standard deviation of
actual growth over the previous 5 years as alternative variables to capture business cycle features. These turned out
not to be significant in my estimations and therefore the results are not reported.
je
D
o
w
n
o
un
d
e
d
F
r
o
m
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
d
je
r
e
c
t
.
m
je
t
.
/
e
d
toi
un
d
e
v
/
un
r
t
je
c
e
–
p
d
je
F
/
/
/
/
/
3
3
2
1
1
6
4
2
9
3
2
un
d
e
v
_
un
_
0
0
0
7
0
p
d
.
F
b
oui
g
toi
e
s
t
t
o
n
0
8
S
e
p
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
2
3
POTENTIAL GROWTH IN ASIA AND ITS DETERMINANTS 17
Tableau 4. Tests of the Endogeneity Hypothesis
Fixed Effects Estimations
(cid:2)π
Dgdev
Constant
Estimate of gdevB
t-statistic on H0 : gdevB − (cid:2)gB = 0
Non. of economies
Non. of observations
0.015
2.209∗∗
Asian Economies
0.051∗
0.020
2.859∗∗
–
−1.138∗∗ −0.353∗∗ −1.669∗∗
1.189∗∗
–
–
All Economies
0.030
–
−0.096
–
–
69
2,456
1.071∗∗
0.031
69
2,456
−0.012
21
671
21
671
Mean Group Estimations
0.045∗
1.721∗∗
−0.891∗∗ −0.100
Asian Economies
0.054∗
–
All Economies
0.068∗∗
–
−0.034
–
–
69
2,456
(cid:2)π
Dgdev
Constant
Estimate of gdevB
t-statistic on H0 : gdevB − (cid:2)gB = 0
Non. of economies
Non. of observations
Remarques: ∗∗∗, ∗∗, and ∗ indicate significance at the 1%, 5%, et 10% level, respectivement. Variables
instrumented with first lag. Standard errors from Driscoll and Kraay (1998) used. To avoid undue
influence from high-inflation episodes, years with average inflation rates higher than 25% for the “All
Economies” specifications and higher than 45% for the “Asian Economies” specifications are excluded
from the estimations.
Source: Author’s calculations.
0.062∗∗
2.325∗∗
−1.306∗∗
1.019∗
−0.182
21
671
−0.210
69
2,456
0.830∗∗
21
671
–
–
refer to the fixed effects or mean group estimates, the estimations for all economies
and Asian economies estimations both return clear-cut results. As expected, le
dummy variable Dgdev
turns out always to be positive and highly significant, as does
gdevB. Cependant, the null hypothesis that gdevB is not significantly different from
(cid:2)gB is never rejected, implying that there is no significant evidence of an increase
in potential growth ((cid:2)g N
B
> 0) during boom periods.
t
t
Tableau 5 reports the results from my investigation of the endogeneity hypothesis
using the second approach outlined above that relies on my benchmark model. Comme
can be seen, Dgdev
turns out to be positive but not statistically significant. Ce
outcome is consistent with the results in Table 4 as I again do not find significant
evidence supporting the endogeneity hypothesis for potential growth. De plus,
there is no significant evidence that deviations of the actual from the potential growth
rate (proxied by gdev5t ) play a significant role. This result implies that, cependant
deep and persistent, the decline in actual growth associated with the 2008–2009
global financial crisis can be expected not to leave permanent scars on long-term
growth. An additional implication is that an economic policy intervention to boost
the latter
short-term growth above the potential growth rate will not affect
significantly. En effet, my results indicate that, by increasing growth volatility,
this type of policy intervention may actually indirectly harm long-term growth
je
D
o
w
n
o
un
d
e
d
F
r
o
m
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
d
je
r
e
c
t
.
m
je
t
.
/
e
d
toi
un
d
e
v
/
un
r
t
je
c
e
–
p
d
je
F
/
/
/
/
/
3
3
2
1
1
6
4
2
9
3
2
un
d
e
v
_
un
_
0
0
0
7
0
p
d
.
F
b
oui
g
toi
e
s
t
t
o
n
0
8
S
e
p
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
2
3
18 ASIAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
Tableau 5. The Endogeneity Hypothesis: Fixed Effects Estimations
All Economies
1.229∗∗
0.124∗∗
−0.001∗
0.075∧
−0.008∧
1.194∗
0.004
−0.003∗
−2.812∗
0.081∗∗
−0.0001∗
2.017∧
−2.825∗∗
0.154
0.026
−0.191∗
−5.712∗∗
1.14
61
421
gwap
es3enrot
es3enrot_sq
gap
gap_ polstab
goveff
integr
integr_regq
lamrig
trade
trade_sq
voa
dummy0814
Dgdev
gdev5
gdev5sd
Constant
F-statistic for H0 : θ1 = 1
Non. of economies
Non. of observations
Remarques: ∗∗∗, ∗∗, and ∗ indicate significance at the 1%, 5%, et 10% level, respectivement.
Variables instrumented with first lag. Standard errors from Driscoll and Kraay (1998)
used.
Source: Author’s calculations.
Asian Economies
3.687∗∗
0.156
−0.004∗
0.013
0.005
−1.198
0.005
−0.010∧
−12.869∗∗
0.165∗∗
−0.0003∗
−0.836
−2.009∗∗
0.192
0.152
−0.314∗
7.964∧
13.22∗
18
121
performance. I find that gdev5sd turns out to be robustly significant and enters with
a negative sign, both in the “All Economies” and the “Asian Economies” estimations
in Table 5, which is in line with other evidence in the literature (voir, Par exemple,
Ramey and Ramey 1995).
Donc, the analysis carried out in this section suggests that the effects of
demand-management policies aimed at increasing actual growth above the potential
growth rate will not affect the trajectory of the latter and will be short-lived at best.
To have a positive impact on long-term growth performance, demand-management
policies should aim at stabilizing the actual growth rate as close as possible around
the path of potential growth.
V. Conclusions
Focusing on the performance of Asian economies over the period 1960–2014,
this paper contributes to the empirical literature on potential growth in several
respects. I provide estimates of potential growth for 21 Asian economies using
an AS state-space model with time-varying parameters and a Kalman filtering
methodology. My estimates appear to fit well with the growth experiences of Asian
economies and indicate that the actual growth slowdowns experienced by many
je
D
o
w
n
o
un
d
e
d
F
r
o
m
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
d
je
r
e
c
t
.
m
je
t
.
/
e
d
toi
un
d
e
v
/
un
r
t
je
c
e
–
p
d
je
F
/
/
/
/
/
3
3
2
1
1
6
4
2
9
3
2
un
d
e
v
_
un
_
0
0
0
7
0
p
d
.
F
b
oui
g
toi
e
s
t
t
o
n
0
8
S
e
p
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
2
3
POTENTIAL GROWTH IN ASIA AND ITS DETERMINANTS 19
of these economies in the 2000s can be associated with the falling trajectories
of their potential growth rates. Suivant, I investigate the determinants of potential
growth using a larger panel of 69 advanced and emerging economies and data for
35 possible growth determinants. Relying on the BMA selection procedure, I select
seven variables that, together with the growth rate of the working-age population,
can be considered robust determinants of potential growth. The results are in line
with expectations and indicate that potential growth is influenced by various aspects
of institutional quality, the technology gap with the US, trade, and tertiary education,
as well as by the growth rate of the working-age population. En particulier, I find
that the effects of integration with international financial markets are positive and
significant only for economies with weak institutions.
With the objective of providing evidence regarding the possible effects of the
2008–2009 global financial crisis on the dynamics of the potential growth rate, je
extend the benchmark model to include proxies for business cycle features. Moi aussi
carry out a new test of the endogeneity hypothesis proposed by Le´on–Ledesma
and Thirlwall (2002). My results indicate that deviations of actual growth from
the estimated potential growth rate do not have a significant impact on potential
growth itself, which is in line with the hypothesis that recessions and booms do
not have long-lasting effects on long-term growth performance. On the other hand,
I find that actual growth volatility with respect to potential growth does have a
significant negative effect on g N
t . This indicates that policies aimed at stabilizing
actual growth in the proximity of the potential growth rate can have beneficial effects
on an economy’s long-term growth performance.
Dans l'ensemble, the evidence gathered supports the hypothesis that Asian economies
may have entered a new era of slower potential and actual growth rates. My results
also suggest that appropriate changes in economic policies and institutions can play a
significant role in lifting the potential growth rate. If these are carried out effectively,
the “new normal” in Asia may come to resemble previous growth patterns more than
would otherwise have been expected.
Les références
Banque asiatique de développement. 2016. Asian Development Outlook. Manila.
Abiad, UN., E. Detragiache, and T. Tressel. 2010. A New Database of Financial Reforms. IMF Staff
Papers 57 (2): 281–302.
Barro, R., and J.-W. Lee. 2001. International Data on Educational Attainment: Updates and
Implications. Oxford Economic Papers 53 (3): 541–63.
——. 2013. A New Data Set of Educational Attainment in the World, 1950–2010. Journal de
Development Economics 104 (2013): 184–98.
Blinder, UN. S., et R. M.. Solow. 1973. Does Fiscal Policy Matter? Journal of Public Economics
2 (1973): 319–37.
Campos, N., and J. Nugent. 2012. The Dynamics of the Regulation of Labor in Developing and
Developed Economies since 1960. IZA Discussion Paper 6881. Bonn: IZA.
je
D
o
w
n
o
un
d
e
d
F
r
o
m
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
d
je
r
e
c
t
.
m
je
t
.
/
e
d
toi
un
d
e
v
/
un
r
t
je
c
e
–
p
d
je
F
/
/
/
/
/
3
3
2
1
1
6
4
2
9
3
2
un
d
e
v
_
un
_
0
0
0
7
0
p
d
.
F
b
oui
g
toi
e
s
t
t
o
n
0
8
S
e
p
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
2
3
20 ASIAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
Castellacci, F., and J. Natera. 2011. A New Panel Dataset for Cross-Economy Analyses of National
Systems, Growth, and Development. Norwegian Institute of International Affairs Working
Paper 783. Oslo: Norwegian Institute of International Affairs.
Chinn, M., and H. Ito. 2006. What Matters for Financial Development? Capital Controls,
Institutions, and Interactions. Journal of Development Economics 81 (1): 163–92.
Christopoulos, D., and M. UN. Le´on–Ledesma. 2014. Efficiency and Production Frontiers in
the Aftermath of Recessions: International Evidence. Macroeconomic Dynamics 18 (6):
1326–50.
Ciccone, UN., and M. Jarocinski. 2010. Determinants of Economic Growth: Will Data Tell?
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 2 (4): 222–46.
Corbae, D., et S. Ouliaris. 2006. Extracting Cycles from Non-Stationary Data. In D. Corbae, S. N.
Durlauf, et B. E. Hansen, éd.. Econometric Theory and Practice: Frontiers of Analysis
and Applied Research. New York: la presse de l'Universite de Cambridge.
Corbae, D., S. Ouliaris, and P. C. B. Phillips. 2002. Band Spectral Regression with Trending Data.
Econometrica 70 (3): 1067–109.
Driscoll, J.. C., et un. C. Kraay. 1998. Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation with Spatially
Dependent Panel Data. Review of Economics and Statistics 80 (4): 549–60.
Felipe, J., N. Sotocinal, and C. Bayudan–Dacuycuy. 2015. The Impact of Financial Factors on the
Output Gap and Estimates of Potential Output Growth. ADB Economics Working Paper
Series No. 457. Manila: Banque asiatique de développement.
Fern´andez, E. L., and M. F. J.. Acier. 2001. Model Uncertainty in Cross-Economy Growth
Regressions. Journal of Applied Econometrics 16 (5): 563–76.
Ghosh, J., et un. Ghattas. 2015. Bayesian Variable Selection Under Collinearity. The American
Statistician 69 (3): 165–73.
Gwartney J., R.. Lawson, and J. Hall. 2014. Economic Freedom of the World Annual Report.
http://www.freetheworld.com/datasets_efw.html
Harrod, R.. F. 1939. An Essay in Dynamic Theory. The Economic Journal 49 (1939): 14–33.
Harvey, UN. 1989. Forecasting: Structural Time Series Models and the Kalman Filter. Cambridge,
ROYAUME-UNI: la presse de l'Universite de Cambridge.
Kose, M., E. Prasad, K. Rogoff, et S. Wei. 2009. Financial Globalization: A Reappraisal. IMF
Staff Papers 56 (1): 8–62.
voie, P., and G. Milesi–Ferretti. 2007. The External Wealth of Nations Mark II: Revised and
Extended Estimates of Foreign Assets and Liabilities, 1970–2004. Journal of International
Economics 73 (2): 223–50.
Lanzafame, M.. 2010. The Endogeneity of the Natural Rate of Growth in the Regions of Italy.
International Review of Applied Economics 24 (5): 533–52.
Lanzafame, M., et R. Nogueira 2011. Credibility in Emerging Economies: Does Inflation
Targeting Matter? The Manchester School 79 (6): 1080–98.
Le´on–Ledesma, M.. UN. 2002. Accumulation, Innovation, and Catching-Up: An Extended
Cumulative Growth Model. Cambridge Journal of Economics 26 (2): 201–16.
Le´on–Ledesma, M.. UN., et un. P.. Thirlwall. 2002. The Endogeneity of the Natural Rate of Growth.
Cambridge Journal of Economics 26 (4): 441–59.
Magnus, J.. R., Ô. Powell, and P. Pr¨ufer. 2010. A Comparison of Two Model Averaging Techniques
with an Application to Growth Empirics. Journal of Econometrics 154 (2): 139–53.
Masanjala, W. H., and C. Papageorgiou. 2008. Rough and Lonely Road to Prosperity: UN
Reexamination of the Sources of Growth in Africa Using Bayesian Model Averaging.
Journal of Applied Econometrics 23 (5): 671–82.
je
D
o
w
n
o
un
d
e
d
F
r
o
m
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
d
je
r
e
c
t
.
m
je
t
.
/
e
d
toi
un
d
e
v
/
un
r
t
je
c
e
–
p
d
je
F
/
/
/
/
/
3
3
2
1
1
6
4
2
9
3
2
un
d
e
v
_
un
_
0
0
0
7
0
p
d
.
F
b
oui
g
toi
e
s
t
t
o
n
0
8
S
e
p
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
2
3
POTENTIAL GROWTH IN ASIA AND ITS DETERMINANTS 21
Pesaran, H., et R. Forgeron. 1995. Estimating Long-Run Relationships from Dynamic
Heterogeneous Panels. Journal of Econometrics 68 (1): 79–113.
Psacharopoulos, G. 1994. Returns to Investment
in Education: A Global Update. Monde
Développement 22 (9): 1325–43.
Ramey, G., and V. UN. Ramey. 1995. Cross-Economy Evidence on the Link Between Volatility and
Growth. The American Economic Review 85 (5): 1138–51.
Romer, D. 1993. Openness and Inflation: Theory and Evidence. The Quarterly Journal of
Economics 108 (4): 869–903.
Sala-i-Martin, X., G. Doppelhofer, et R. je. Miller. 2004. Determinants of Long-Term Growth: UN
Bayesian Averaging of Classical Estimates Approach. American Economic Review 94 (4):
813–35.
Sims, C. 2001. Comments on Sargent and Cogley’s Evolving Post-World War II US Inflation
Dynamics. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 16 (2001): 373–79.
Appendix
Table A.1. Economies Included in the Analysis
Asian economies Azerbaijan; Bangladesh; Cambodia; People’s Republic of China; Hong Kong,
Chine; India; Indonésie; Japan; Kazakhstan; Republic of Korea; Malaisie;
Pakistan; Philippines; Singapore; Sri Lanka; Taipei,Chine; Tajikistan; Thaïlande;
Turkmenistan; Uzbekistan; Viet Nam
Other emerging
économies
Advanced
économies
Algeria, Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic,
Ecuador, Egypt, Hungary, Mexico, Morocco, Panama, Peru, Poland, Qatar, Saudi
Arabia, Afrique du Sud, Turkey, Uruguay, Venezuela
Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finlande,
France, Allemagne, Grèce, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Luxembourg,
The Netherlands, Nouvelle-Zélande, Norway, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia,
Espagne, Sweden, Suisse, United Kingdom, États-Unis
Source: Author’s compilation.
Table A.2. Variables and Data Sources
Variable
Definition
Source
gn
Potential growth rate estimate
Author’s estimates using WDI–IFS
data
g
gdev
gdev5
gdev5sd
Actual growth rate
g-gn
Average of g_dev over previous 5 années
Standard deviation of the g_dev5 over the
WDI–IFS data
Author’s calculations
Author’s calculations
Author’s calculations
previous 5 années
Gwap
Growth rate of working-age population
Author’s calculations using
(aged 15–64 years)
WDI–IFS data
Auxiliary regressors used for the BMA selection procedure
1
di16merdt R&D expenditures as a percentage of GDP CANA Database (v. Jan 2011) par
Castellacci and Natera (2011);
original source: UNESCO,
OECD, RICYT
Continued.
je
D
o
w
n
o
un
d
e
d
F
r
o
m
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
d
je
r
e
c
t
.
m
je
t
.
/
e
d
toi
un
d
e
v
/
un
r
t
je
c
e
–
p
d
je
F
/
/
/
/
/
3
3
2
1
1
6
4
2
9
3
2
un
d
e
v
_
un
_
0
0
0
7
0
p
d
.
F
b
oui
g
toi
e
s
t
t
o
n
0
8
S
e
p
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
2
3
22 ASIAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
Variable
Definition
Source
Table A.2. Continued.
2 es1enrop
Gross enrollment ratio (primaire): ratio of
total enrollment, regardless of age, to the
population of the age group that
officially corresponds to the primary
level
3 es2enros
Gross enrollment ratio (secondaire): ratio
of total enrollment, regardless of age, à
the population of the age group that
officially corresponds to the secondary
level
4 es3enrot
Gross enrollment ratio (tertiary): ratio of
total enrollment, regardless of age, to the
population of the age group that
officially corresponds to the tertiary level
5 es10schom
Mean years of schooling: average number
of years of school completed in
population over the age of 14 années
6 es12educe
Public expenditure on education: current
and capital public expenditure on
éducation
7 es14teacr_ plus Primary pupil–teacher ratio: number of
8 ghc
pupils enrolled in primary school /
number of primary school teachers
Percentage growth rate in index of human
capital per person based on years of
schooling (Barro and Lee 2013) et
returns to education (Psacharopoulos
1994)
CANA Database (v. Jan 2011) par
Castellacci and Natera (2011);
original source: UNESCO
CANA Database (v. Jan 2011) par
Castellacci and Natera (2011);
original source: UNESCO
CANA Database (v. Jan 2011) par
Castellacci and Natera (2011);
original source: UNESCO
CANA Database (v. Jan 2011) par
Castellacci and Natera (2011);
original sources: Barro and Lee
(2001) and World Bank’s WDI
(national accounts data)
CANA Database (v. Jan 2011) par
Castellacci and Natera (2011);
original source: UNESCO
CANA Database (v. Jan 2011) par
Castellacci and Natera (2011);
original source: UNESCO
Author’s calculations using PWT
8.1 data
9 econglob
Index of Globalization: long distance flows
KOF Index of Globalization
je
D
o
w
n
o
un
d
e
d
F
r
o
m
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
d
je
r
e
c
t
.
m
je
t
.
/
e
d
toi
un
d
e
v
/
un
r
t
je
c
e
–
p
d
je
F
/
/
/
/
/
3
3
2
1
1
6
4
2
9
3
2
un
d
e
v
_
un
_
0
0
0
7
0
p
d
.
10 overallglob
of goods, capital, and services, et
information, and perceptions that
accompany market exchanges measured
on a scale ranging from 0 (lowest) à 10
(highest)
Overall Globalization Index: weighted
average of econ_ glob, soc_ glob, et
pol_ glob on a scale ranging from 0
(lowest) à 100 (highest)
11 agrempsh
Employment in agriculture (% of total
employment)
12 indempsh
Employment in industry (% of total
employment)
F
b
oui
g
toi
e
s
t
t
o
n
0
8
S
e
p
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
2
3
KOF Index of Globalization
International Labour Organization,
Key Indicators of the Labour
Market database; Global
Employment Trends Dataset
(2014)
International Labour Organization,
Key Indicators of the Labour
Market database; Global
Employment Trends Dataset
(2014)
Continued.
POTENTIAL GROWTH IN ASIA AND ITS DETERMINANTS 23
Variable
Definition
Source
Table A.2. Continued.
13 serempsh Employment in services (% of total
employment)
International Labour Organization,
Key Indicators of the Labour
Market database; Global
Employment Trends Dataset
(2014)
14 gap100
Technology gap variable: 1 minus the ratio
Author’s calculations using PWT
8.1 data
of the level of labor productivity
vis-`a-vis that of the US in purchasing
power parity terms, multiplied by 100;
labor productivity computed as a ratio
(rgdpo/emp), where rgdpo is output-side
real GDP at chained purchasing power
parity (in millions of 2005 US dollars)
and emp is number of persons engaged
(in millions); follows specification
proposed by Le´on–Ledesma (2002)
15 gckemp
Percentage growth rate of the capital–labor
Author’s calculations using PWT
ratio
8.1 data
16 lmr
Index of labor market regulations
Gwartney et al. (2014) EFW 2014
Annual Report
World Bank’s Doing Business
database; LAMRIG database
from Campos and Nugent (2012)
17 lamrig
measuring economic freedom (par exemple.,
market forces determine wages and the
conditions of hiring and firing,
government refrains from the use of
conscription) on a scale ranging from 0
(lowest) à 10 (highest)
Index of labor market rigidity on a scale
ranging from 0 (lowest) à 3 (highest);
data for 2004–2013 are from the World
Bank’s Doing Business database,
pre-2004 data are from the LAMRIG
database from Campos and Nugent
(2012); since the index exhibits very
little variation, annual values are
assumed constant over the 5-year periods
considered by Campos and Nugent
(2012); Campos and Nugent (2012) state
the LAMRIG index is consistent with the
World Bank’s Doing Business database
18 cocorr
Control of Corruption Index reflects
World Bank’s Worldwide
Governance Indicators (2014
Update)
perceptions of the extent to which public
power is exercised for private gain,
including both petty and grand forms of
corruption, as well as the capture of the
state by elites and private interests on a
scale measuring governance
performance ranging from −2.5 (weak)
à 2.5 (fort)
Continued.
je
D
o
w
n
o
un
d
e
d
F
r
o
m
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
d
je
r
e
c
t
.
m
je
t
.
/
e
d
toi
un
d
e
v
/
un
r
t
je
c
e
–
p
d
je
F
/
/
/
/
/
3
3
2
1
1
6
4
2
9
3
2
un
d
e
v
_
un
_
0
0
0
7
0
p
d
.
F
b
oui
g
toi
e
s
t
t
o
n
0
8
S
e
p
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
2
3
24 ASIAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
Variable
19 goveff
Table A.2. Continued.
Definition
Source
World Bank’s Worldwide
Governance Indicators (2014
Update)
Government Effectiveness Index reflects
perceptions of the quality of public
services, quality of the civil service and
the degree of its independence from
political pressures, quality of policy
formulation and implementation, et
credibility of the government’s
commitment to such policies on a scale
measuring governance performance
ranging from approximately –2.5 (weak)
à 2.5 (fort)
20 pf1corri Corruption Perception Index on a scale
measuring corruption ranging from 0
(highest) à 10 (lowest)
CANA Database (v. Jan 2011), par
Castellacci and Natera (2011), pour
pre-2008 data, Transparency
International for 2008–2014 data;
original source: Transparency
International
21 polstab
Political Stability (and Absence of
World Bank’s Worldwide
Violence and Terrorism) Index reflects
perceptions of the likelihood that the
government will be destabilized or
overthrown by unconstitutional or
violent means, including politically
motivated violence and terrorism on a
scale measuring governance
performance ranging from –2.5 (weak)
à 2.5 (fort)
Regulatory Quality Index reflects
perceptions of the ability of the
government to formulate and implement
sound policies and regulations that
permit and promote private sector
development on a scale measuring
governance performance ranging from
–2.5 (weak) à 2.5 (fort)
Governance Indicators (2014
Update)
World Bank’s Worldwide
Governance Indicators (2014
Update)
22 regq
23 rol
Rule of Law Index reflects perceptions of
World Bank’s Worldwide
Governance Indicators (2014
Update)
the extent to which agents have
confidence in and abide by the rules of
society, particularly the quality of
contract enforcement, property rights,
the police, and the courts, as well as the
likelihood of crime and violence on a
scale measuring governance
performance ranging from –2.5 (weak)
à 2.5 (fort)
Continued.
je
D
o
w
n
o
un
d
e
d
F
r
o
m
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
d
je
r
e
c
t
.
m
je
t
.
/
e
d
toi
un
d
e
v
/
un
r
t
je
c
e
–
p
d
je
F
/
/
/
/
/
3
3
2
1
1
6
4
2
9
3
2
un
d
e
v
_
un
_
0
0
0
7
0
p
d
.
F
b
oui
g
toi
e
s
t
t
o
n
0
8
S
e
p
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
2
3
POTENTIAL GROWTH IN ASIA AND ITS DETERMINANTS 25
Variable
Definition
Source
Table A.2. Continued.
24 voa
25 trade
Voice and Accountability Index reflects
perceptions of the extent to which an
economy’s citizens are able to participate
in selecting their government, ainsi que
freedom of expression, freedom of
association, and a free media on a scale
measuring governance performance
ranging from –2.5 (weak) à 2.5 (fort)
Index of Openness: the sum of exports and
imports of goods and services measured
as a share of GDP
26 rmex
Raw materials as a share of total exports
World Bank’s Worldwide
Governance Indicators (2014
Update)
World Bank’s WDI (national
accounts data) and OECD’s
national accounts data
UN Comtrade Database, SITC
Aggregate 2, Revision 1. Pour
Taipei,Chine, Customs
27 fmex
Fuels and mining products as a share of
Administration of the Ministry of
total exports
Finance. https://portal.sw.nat.gov
.tw/APGA/GA03E
28 rmfmex
Sum of raw materials and fuel and mining
products as a share of total exports
30 finref
29 kaopen Kaopen Index measuring capital account
openness; normalized to be between 0
(less open) et 1 (more open)
Financial Reform Index measuring
financial market liberalization;
normalized to be between 0 (less
liberalized) et 1 (more liberalized)
Portfolio Equity Integration Index reflects
the sum of the stocks of portfolio equity
assets and liabilities as a share of GDP;
follows suggestions in Kose et al. (2009)
31 peindex
Chinn and Ito (2006)
Abiad, Detragiache, and Tressel
(2010)
Updated and extended version of
data set constructed by Lane and
Milesi–Ferretti (2007)
32 fdiindex FDI Integration Index reflects the sum of
the stocks of FDI assets and liabilities as
a share of GDP; follows suggestions in
Kose et al. (2009)
33 integr
Integration Index reflects the sum of total
foreign assets and liabilities as a share of
PIB; follows suggestions in Kose et al.
(2009)
Net foreign assets as a share of GDP
34 nfagdp
BMA = Bayesian model averaging; EFW = Economic Freedom of the World; FDI = foreign direct investment;
GDP = gross domestic product; IFS = International Financial Statistics; OECD = Organisation for Economic
Co-operation and Development; PWT = Penn World Tables; RICYT = Red Iberoamericana de Indicadores de
Ciencia y Tecnolog´ıa; R.&D = research and development; UN = United Nations; UNESCO = United Nations
Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization; WDI = World Development Indicators.
Source: Author’s compilation.
je
D
o
w
n
o
un
d
e
d
F
r
o
m
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
d
je
r
e
c
t
.
m
je
t
.
/
e
d
toi
un
d
e
v
/
un
r
t
je
c
e
–
p
d
je
F
/
/
/
/
/
3
3
2
1
1
6
4
2
9
3
2
un
d
e
v
_
un
_
0
0
0
7
0
p
d
.
F
b
oui
g
toi
e
s
t
t
o
n
0
8
S
e
p
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
2
3
26 ASIAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
Figure A.1. Potential Output Growth Rate Estimates and Actual Output Growth Rates
je
D
o
w
n
o
un
d
e
d
F
r
o
m
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
d
je
r
e
c
t
.
m
je
t
.
/
e
d
toi
un
d
e
v
/
un
r
t
je
c
e
–
p
d
je
F
/
/
/
/
/
3
3
2
1
1
6
4
2
9
3
2
un
d
e
v
_
un
_
0
0
0
7
0
p
d
.
F
b
oui
g
toi
e
s
t
t
o
n
0
8
S
e
p
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
2
3
POTENTIAL GROWTH IN ASIA AND ITS DETERMINANTS 27
Figure A.1. Continued.
Source: Author’s calculations.
je
D
o
w
n
o
un
d
e
d
F
r
o
m
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
d
je
r
e
c
t
.
m
je
t
.
/
e
d
toi
un
d
e
v
/
un
r
t
je
c
e
–
p
d
je
F
/
/
/
/
/
3
3
2
1
1
6
4
2
9
3
2
un
d
e
v
_
un
_
0
0
0
7
0
p
d
.
F
b
oui
g
toi
e
s
t
t
o
n
0
8
S
e
p
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
2
3
Télécharger le PDF