ERRATA
Errata: “Causal Contributions of the
Domain-General (Multiple Demand) y
the Language-Selective Brain Networks
to Perceptual and Semantic Challenges
in Speech Comprehension”
Lucy J. MacGregor1, Rebecca A. Gilbert1, Zuzanna Balewski2, Daniel J. Mitchell1,
Sharon W. Erzinçlioğlu1, Jennifer M. Rodd3, John Duncan1,
Evelina Fedorenko4,5,6, and Matthew H. Davis1
1MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Reino Unido
2Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, Universidad de California, berkeley, berkeley, California
3Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, Londres, Reino Unido
4Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Instituto de Tecnología de Massachusetts, Cambridge, MAMÁ
5McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Instituto de Tecnología de Massachusetts, Cambridge, MAMÁ
6Program in Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAMÁ
After publication of our paper “Causal Contributions of the Domain-General (Multiple
Demand) and the Language-Selective Brain Networks to Perceptual and Semantic Challenges
in Speech Comprehension” (https://doi.org/10.1162/nol_a_00081), we discovered an error in
Mesa 1. Específicamente, in the two right-most columns, values with more than one digit are
missing the first digit. Please see the corrected table below.
The authors confirm that there are no mistakes in the analysis; the error is in the values
presented in the table and occurred after acceptance.
un acceso abierto
diario
Citación: MacGregor, l. J., Gilbert,
R. A., Balewski, Z., mitchell, D. J.,
Erzinçlioğlu, S. w., Rodd, j. METRO.,
Duncan, J., Fedorenko, MI., & davis,
METRO. h. (2023). Errata: “Causal
contributions of the domain-general
(multiple demand) and the language-
selective brain networks to perceptual
and semantic challenges in speech
comprehension.” Neurobiology of
Idioma, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1162
/nol_x_00103
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1162/nol_x_00103
Autor correspondiente:
Lucy J. MacGregor
lucy.macgregor@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk
Derechos de autor: © 2023
Instituto de Tecnología de Massachusetts
Publicado bajo Creative Commons
Atribución 4.0 Internacional
(CC POR 4.0) licencia
La prensa del MIT
yo
D
oh
w
norte
oh
a
d
mi
d
F
r
oh
metro
h
t
t
pag
:
/
/
d
i
r
mi
C
t
.
metro
i
t
.
mi
d
tu
norte
oh
/
yo
/
yo
a
r
t
i
C
mi
–
pag
d
F
/
4
1
/
/
i
/
yo
/
2
0
7
2
3
3
8
norte
oh
_
X
_
0
0
1
0
3
pag
d
.
F
b
y
gramo
tu
mi
s
t
t
oh
norte
0
7
S
mi
pag
mi
metro
b
mi
r
2
0
2
3
Mesa 1.
Participant profiles, including initial group assignment, demographics, lesion details, IQ based on the NART, and TROG2 scores.
norte
mi
tu
r
oh
b
oh
oh
gramo
y
i
yo
Participant Group
LANG
lang1
Age at
prueba
50
Sex
F
oh
F
l
a
norte
gramo
tu
a
gramo
mi
lang2
lang3
lang4
lang5
lang6
md1
md2
md3
md4
md5
md6a
md7
md8
md9
md10b
other1
LANG
LANG
LANG
LANG
LANG
Maryland
Maryland
Maryland
Maryland
Maryland
Maryland
Maryland
Maryland
Maryland
Maryland
OTHER
75
58
65
50
56
58
63
64
53
69
61
52
74
67
81
58
Lesion aetiology
Lesion location
Tumour
L posterior temporal, posterior corpus
callosum, posterior cingulum
Stroke (ischaemic)
L frontal and anterior insular cortex
Stroke (haemorrhagic)
R frontotemporoparietal and anterior
Tumour
thalamus
L temporal
F
F
F
M Other (abscess removal)
L temporal
M Tumour
R inferior parietal/temporal
M Stroke (ischaemic)
L occipitoparietal
F
Tumour
L superior parietal lobe
M Other (unknown)
R frontotemporoparietal surrounding insular
corteza. Anterior branch of internal capsule
F
Tumour
R superior frontal
M Stroke (haemorrhagic)
L frontal
M Tumour + Stroke
(haemorrhagic)
R posterior frontal and some anterior/medial,
extending to post-central gyrus/parietal
areas
F
Tumour
M Tumour
M Tumour
Bifrontal
R frontal
L anterior frontal
M Stroke (haemorrhagic)
L temporooccipital
M Other (resection for
epilepsy)
R temporal
other2
OTHER
60
M Stroke (haemorrhagic)
R basal ganglia (putamen + caudate +
thalamus) and internal capsule dorsal
anterior insula
other3
OTHER
37
F
Stroke (haemorrhagic)
L frontal
Premorbid IQ
(from NART)
108
TROG2
Score
14
Total lesion
volumen (cm3)
29.49
86
123
117
101
112
97
123
115
106
101
123
112
120
126
81
NA
97
105
8
18
16
14
12
15
17
15
14
4
13
16
16
18
14
16
17
15
64.06
139.70
21.90
19.71
42.38
78.21
37.06
68.59
114.68
113.15
131.27
59.02
27.68
24.05
13.26
17.84
25.37
12.52
Nota. NART = National Adult Reading Test (nelson, 1982); TROG2 = Test of Reception of Grammar (obispo, 2003); lang/LANG = language; md/MD = multiple demand; L = left; R = right.
a Participant md6 was excluded from the degraded speech task analyses.
b Participant md10 was excluded from the semantic ambiguity task analyses.
mi
r
r
a
t
tu
metro
yo
D
oh
w
norte
oh
a
d
mi
d
F
r
oh
metro
h
t
t
pag
:
/
/
d
i
r
mi
C
t
.
metro
i
t
.
mi
d
tu
norte
oh
/
yo
/
yo
a
r
t
i
C
mi
–
pag
d
F
/
4
1
/
/
i
/
yo
/
2
0
7
2
3
3
8
norte
oh
_
X
_
0
0
1
0
3
pag
d
.
F
b
y
gramo
tu
mi
s
t
t
oh
norte
0
7
S
mi
pag
mi
metro
b
mi
r
2
0
2
3
